Cerebrospinal fluid shunt dynamics in patients with idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome.

The objective was to assess CSF dynamics of different shunt constructions in patients with adult hydrocephalus syndrome and correlate these findings to clinical outcome, neuroradiology, and the specifications of the shunts provided by the manufacturer. Thirty four patients with idiopathic adult hydrocephalus (normal pressure hydrocephalus) syndrome were included in a prospective, consecutive case series. A differential pressure valve (Cordis Hakim standard system) was used in 28 patients and a variable resistance valve (Cordis Orbis-Sigma) in six. A constant pressure infusion method was used; CSF pressure and conductance were determined before surgery. Three months after shunt placement CSF pressure, the "pressure v flow" curve, and gravity induced flow were measured. There was no difference between mean preoperative and postoperative resting CSF pressures in patients with Hakim shunts. The opening pressures of the Hakim shunts were higher than the value proposed by the manufacturer. A pronounced gravity effect induced CSF flow and decrease of the CSF pressure. In functioning variable resistance valves, CSF dynamics normalised postoperatively. There was no gravity effect and the characteristics shaped "pressure v flow" curve was sometimes seen. Six patients (three differential pressure valves, three variable resistance valves) had non-functioning shunts. Four of these patients were improved after the operation but improvement was transient in three. In all patients, there was no relation between the width of the ventricles and clinical improvement or CSF pressure. In conclusion, the differential pressure valve system does not behave according to the specifications provided by the manufacturer. A decrease in CSF pressure in patients with this shunt was solely due to the effect of gravity. Eleven percent of the differential pressure valves and 50% of the variable resistance valves were non-functioning. In the functioning variable resistance valves, the antisiphon system seems to be effective.

[1]  R. Pudenz,et al.  Hydrocephalus: overdrainage by ventricular shunts. A review and recommendations. , 1991, Surgical neurology.

[2]  J. Piatt Physical examination of patients with cerebrospinal fluid shunts: is there useful information in pumping the shunt? , 1992, Pediatrics.

[3]  E. Cosman,et al.  The relationship between ventricular fluid pressure and body position in normal subjects and subjects with shunts: a telemetric study. , 1990, Neurosurgery.

[4]  B. Miller Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with "normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure". , 1970, Virginia medical monthly.

[5]  R. D. Adams,et al.  SYMPTOMATIC OCCULT HYDROCEPHALUS WITH "NORMAL" CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID PRESSURE.A TREATABLE SYNDROME. , 1965, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Miller Bh Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with "normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure". , 1970 .

[7]  S. E. Børgesen,et al.  The predictive value of conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Mechanical complications in shunts. , 1991, Pediatric neurosurgery.

[9]  E. Laws,et al.  Occult hydrocephalus: results of shunting correlated with diagnostic tests. , 1977, Clinical neurosurgery.

[10]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[11]  E. Laws,et al.  Surgical treatment of idiopathic hydrocephalus in elderly patients , 1985, Neurology.

[12]  N. Graff-Radford,et al.  Normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Onset of gait abnormality before dementia predicts good surgical outcome. , 1986, Archives of neurology.

[13]  R. Green,et al.  Effect of cerebrospinal fluid shunts on intracranial pressure and on cerebrospinal fluid dynamics , 1973, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[14]  J Ekstedt,et al.  The predictive value of cerebrospinal fluid dynamic tests in patients with th idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. , 1995, Archives of neurology.

[15]  E. Foltz,et al.  Symptomatic low intracranial pressure in shunted hydrocephalus. , 1988, Journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  J. Ekstedt,et al.  Hydrodynamic Properties of CSF Shunt Systems , 1980 .

[17]  B. Liliequist,et al.  Size of the Intracerebral Ventricles as Measured with Computer Tomography, Encephalography and Echoventriculography , 1975, Acta radiologica. Supplementum.

[18]  M. Gaab,et al.  Testing the hydrocephalus shunt valve: long-term bench test results of various new and explanted valves. The need for model for testing valves under physiological conditions. , 1991, European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie.

[19]  J. Vassilouthis The syndrome of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. , 1984, Journal of neurosurgery.

[20]  C. Dirven,et al.  Shunting normal pressure hydrocephalus: the predictive value of combined clinical and CT data. , 1993, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[21]  A. Mclaughlin,et al.  A radionuclide method of evaluating shunt function and CSF circulation in hydrocephalus. Technical note. , 1984, Journal of neurosurgery.

[22]  C. Wikkelsø,et al.  The clinical effect of lumbar puncture in normal pressure hydrocephalus. , 1982, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[23]  C. Marsden,et al.  Human walking and higher‐level gait disorders, particularly in the elderly , 1993, Neurology.

[24]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Cerebrospinal fluid shunts: flow measurements with MR imaging. , 1989, Radiology.

[25]  J Ekstedt,et al.  CSF hydrodynamic studies in man. 1. Method of constant pressure CSF infusion. , 1977, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[26]  C. Fisher Hydrocephalus as a cause of disturbances of gait in the elderly , 1982, Neurology.

[27]  R. D. Adams,et al.  The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. , 1965, Journal of the neurological sciences.

[28]  C. Dirven,et al.  Shunting normal‐pressure hydrocephalus: Do the benefits outweigh the risks? , 1992, Neurology.

[29]  J. Malm,et al.  CSF hydrodynamics in superior sagittal sinus thrombosis. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[30]  M. D. Hooven,et al.  A new approach in the treatment of hydrocephalus. , 1987, Journal of neurosurgery.

[31]  L. Clarke,et al.  MR evaluation of flow in a ventricular shunt phantom with in vivo correlation. , 1988, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[32]  H. Shenkin,et al.  Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus-- a report of 73 patients. , 1977, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[33]  P. Black,et al.  CSF shunts for dementia, incontinence, and gait disturbance. , 1985, Clinical neurosurgery.

[34]  C. Fisher Communicating Hydrocephalus , 1977, The Lancet.