User Engagement and Attrition in an App-Based Physical Activity Intervention: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background The success of a mobile phone app in changing health behavior is thought to be contingent on engagement, commonly operationalized as frequency of use. Objective This subgroup analysis of the 2 intervention arms from a 3-group randomized controlled trial aimed to examine user engagement with a 100-day physical activity intervention delivered via an app. Rates of engagement, associations between user characteristics and engagement, and whether engagement was related to intervention efficacy were examined. Methods Engagement was captured in a real-time log of interactions by users randomized to either a gamified (n=141) or nongamified version of the same app (n=160). Physical activity was assessed via accelerometry and self-report at baseline and 3-month follow-up. Survival analysis was used to assess time to nonuse attrition. Mixed models examined associations between user characteristics and engagement (total app use). Characteristics of super users (top quartile of users) and regular users (lowest 3 quartiles) were compared using t tests and a chi-square analysis. Linear mixed models were used to assess whether being a super user was related to change in physical activity over time. Results Engagement was high. Attrition (30 days of nonuse) occurred in 32% and 39% of the gamified and basic groups, respectively, with no significant between-group differences in time to attrition (P=.17). Users with a body mass index (BMI) in the healthy range had higher total app use (mean 230.5, 95% CI 190.6-270.5; F2=8.67; P<.001), compared with users whose BMI was overweight or obese (mean 170.6, 95% CI 139.5-201.6; mean 132.9, 95% CI 104.8-161.0). Older users had higher total app use (mean 200.4, 95% CI 171.9-228.9; F1=6.385; P=.01) than younger users (mean 155.6, 95% CI 128.5-182.6). Super users were 4.6 years older (t297=3.6; P<.001) and less likely to have a BMI in the obese range (χ22=15.1; P<.001). At the 3-month follow-up, super users were completing 28.2 (95% CI 9.4-46.9) more minutes of objectively measured physical activity than regular users (F1,272=4.76; P=.03). Conclusions Total app use was high across the 100-day intervention period, and the inclusion of gamified features enhanced engagement. Participants who engaged the most saw significantly greater increases to their objectively measured physical activity over time, supporting the theory that intervention exposure is linked to efficacy. Further research is needed to determine whether these findings are replicated in other app-based interventions, including those experimentally evaluating engagement and those conducted in real-world settings. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617000113358; https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12617000113358.aspx

[1]  Thomas Franke,et al.  I track, therefore I walk - Exploring the motivational costs of wearing activity trackers in actual users , 2019, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[2]  Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi,et al.  Wearable activity trackers, accuracy, adoption, acceptance and health impact: A systematic literature review , 2019, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[3]  Jennifer M. Murray,et al.  Predicting Outcomes from Engagement With Specific Components of an Internet-Based Physical Activity Intervention With Financial Incentives: Process Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  J. Stinson,et al.  A Library of Analytic Indicators to Evaluate Effective Engagement with Consumer mHealth Apps for Chronic Conditions: Scoping Review , 2019, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[5]  Youlim Kim,et al.  Mobile App-Based Health Promotion Programs: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[6]  C. Vandelanotte,et al.  Measuring Engagement in eHealth and mHealth Behavior Change Interventions: Viewpoint of Methodologies , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  Monique Simons,et al.  The Effect of Physical Activity Interventions Comprising Wearables and Smartphone Applications on Physical Activity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2018, Sports Medicine - Open.

[8]  Patrick C. Shih,et al.  Puzzle Walk: A Gamified Mobile App to Increase Physical Activity in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2018, 2018 10th International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Games for Serious Applications (VS-Games).

[9]  R. Plotnikoff,et al.  Can Smartphone Apps Increase Physical Activity? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[10]  C. Vandelanotte,et al.  More real-world trials are needed to establish if web-based physical activity interventions are effective , 2018, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[11]  Ayoung Suh,et al.  Enhancing User Engagement through Gamification , 2018, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[12]  M. Buijzen,et al.  A randomized controlled trial testing a social network intervention to promote physical activity among adolescents , 2018, BMC Public Health.

[13]  Mark J Edwards,et al.  Exploring the use of a gamified intervention for encouraging physical activity in adolescents: a qualitative longitudinal study in Northern Ireland , 2018, BMJ Open.

[14]  Anouk Middelweerd,et al.  Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Diet-Related eHealth and mHealth Research: Bibliometric Analysis , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  To gamify or not to gamify? An experimental field study of the influence of badges on motivation, activity, and performance in an online learning course , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[16]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  Gamification of Older Adults' Physical Activity: An Eight-Week Study , 2018, HICSS.

[17]  Carol Maher,et al.  Engagement, compliance and retention with a gamified online social networking physical activity intervention , 2017, Translational behavioral medicine.

[18]  S. Edney,et al.  Users’ experiences of wearable activity trackers: a cross-sectional study , 2017, BMC Public Health.

[19]  Tim Olds,et al.  “Active Team” a social and gamified app-based physical activity intervention: randomised controlled trial study protocol , 2017, BMC Public Health.

[20]  L. Lechner,et al.  An eHealth Intervention to Promote Physical Activity and Social Network of Single, Chronically Impaired Older Adults: Adaptation of an Existing Intervention Using Intervention Mapping , 2017, JMIR research protocols.

[21]  Dylan S. Small,et al.  Effect of a Game-Based Intervention Designed to Enhance Social Incentives to Increase Physical Activity Among Families: The BE FIT Randomized Clinical Trial , 2017, JAMA internal medicine.

[22]  Originally,et al.  Effectiveness of a Web 2.0 Intervention to Increase Physical Activity in Real-World Settings: Randomized Ecological Trial , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[23]  Ali Idri,et al.  A systematic review of gamification in e-Health , 2017, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[24]  J. Annesi,et al.  Effects of Instructional Physical Activity Courses on Overall Physical Activity and Mood in University Students , 2017, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[25]  Dana L. Wolff-Hughes,et al.  Characterizing user engagement with health app data: a data mining approach , 2017, Translational behavioral medicine.

[26]  S. Edney,et al.  Does gamification increase engagement with online programs? A systematic review , 2017, PloS one.

[27]  Geir Egil Eide,et al.  Effective behaviour change techniques for physical activity and healthy eating in overweight and obese adults; systematic review and meta-regression analyses , 2017, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[28]  C. Vandelanotte,et al.  Using Web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: findings from the WALK 2.0 randomised controlled trial , 2017, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[29]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis , 2016, Translational behavioral medicine.

[30]  Lyndsay A. Nelson,et al.  Patterns of User Engagement with Mobile- and Web-Delivered Self-Care Interventions for Adults with T2DM: A Review of the Literature , 2016, Current Diabetes Reports.

[31]  C. Vandelanotte,et al.  Past, Present, and Future of eHealth and mHealth Research to Improve Physical Activity and Dietary Behaviors. , 2016, Journal of nutrition education and behavior.

[32]  Danielle E. Ramo,et al.  Smoking Cessation Intervention on Facebook: Which Content Generates the Best Engagement? , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[33]  C. Vandelanotte,et al.  Why We Need More Than Just Randomized Controlled Trials to Establish the Effectiveness of Online Social Networks for Health Behavior Change , 2015, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[34]  Lena Mamykina,et al.  No longer wearing: investigating the abandonment of personal health-tracking technologies on craigslist , 2015, UbiComp.

[35]  Philip Sedgwick,et al.  Understanding the Hawthorne effect , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[36]  Monika Ferguson,et al.  A Web-Based, Social Networking Physical Activity Intervention for Insufficiently Active Adults Delivered via Facebook App: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[37]  Morwenna Kirwan,et al.  Engagement and Nonusage Attrition With a Free Physical Activity Promotion Program: The Case of 10,000 Steps Australia , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[38]  R. Plotnikoff,et al.  Effectiveness of interventions targeting physical activity, nutrition and healthy weight for university and college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[39]  Brian G. Danaher,et al.  From black box to toolbox: Outlining device functionality, engagement activities, and the pervasive information architecture of mHealth interventions , 2015, Internet interventions.

[40]  D. Tate,et al.  Social support for physical activity—role of Facebook with and without structured intervention , 2014, Translational behavioral medicine.

[41]  B. Bonevski,et al.  Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups , 2014, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[42]  C. Vandelanotte,et al.  Are Health Behavior Change Interventions That Use Online Social Networks Effective? A Systematic Review , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[43]  N. D. de Vries,et al.  Online Prevention Aimed at Lifestyle Behaviors: A Systematic Review of Reviews , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[44]  Lucy Yardley,et al.  Opportunities and Challenges for Smartphone Applications in Supporting Health Behavior Change: Qualitative Study , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[45]  S. Kelders,et al.  Persuasive System Design Does Matter: A Systematic Review of Adherence to Web-Based Interventions , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[46]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[47]  Corneel Vandelanotte,et al.  Prospective Associations Between Intervention Components and Website Engagement in a Publicly Available Physical Activity Website: The Case of 10,000 Steps Australia , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[48]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification" , 2011, MindTrek.

[49]  Michael Catt,et al.  Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[50]  M. Hirvensalo,et al.  Perceived constraints on physical exercise among obese and non-obese older people. , 2009, Preventive medicine.

[51]  R. Wing,et al.  A Statewide Intervention Reduces BMI in Adults: Shape Up Rhode Island Results , 2009, Obesity.

[52]  Brian D. Carpenter,et al.  Computer use among older adults in a naturally occurring retirement community , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[53]  C. Vandelanotte,et al.  Website-delivered physical activity interventions a review of the literature. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[54]  D. Warburton,et al.  Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[55]  G. Eysenbach The Law of Attrition , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[56]  F. Penedo,et al.  Exercise and well-being: a review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity , 2005, Current opinion in psychiatry.

[57]  G Wickström,et al.  The "Hawthorne effect"--what did the original Hawthorne studies actually show? , 2000, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[58]  C R Nigg,et al.  Stages of change across ten health risk behaviors for older adults. , 1999, The Gerontologist.

[59]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[60]  C. Vandelanotte,et al.  The Effectiveness of a Web-Based Computer-Tailored Physical Activity Intervention Using Fitbit Activity Trackers: Randomized Trial. , 2018 .

[61]  Annie Y. S. Lau,et al.  The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[62]  A. Levêque,et al.  Is obesity associated with injuries among young people? , 2004, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[63]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[64]  F. M. Berg Health Risks Associated With Weight Loss and Obesity Treatment Programs , 1999 .