Numerical modeling of EPS seismic buffer shaking table tests

Abstract The paper describes the details and verification of a FLAC numerical code that was used to simulate the results of an experimental program of reduced-scale wall models constructed with a seismic geofoam buffer inclusion and loaded using a large shaking table. Five physical tests constructed with expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam materials having different modulus values and a control case with no geofoam inclusion were carried out. The paper shows that the numerical model was able to capture the trend in earth forces with increasing base acceleration for all six models and in most cases quantitative dynamic load–time response of the numerical simulations was in good agreement with measured values.

[1]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  A simple displacement model for response analysis of EPS geofoam seismic buffers , 2007 .

[2]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Shaking table testing of geofoam seismic buffers , 2007 .

[3]  Kianoosh Hatami,et al.  Effect of structural design on fundamental frequency of reinforced-soil retaining walls , 2000 .

[4]  A Mcgown,et al.  CONTROLLED YIELDING OF THE LATERAL BOUNDARIES OF SOIL RETAINING STRUCTURES , 1988 .

[5]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Influence of reinforcement parameters on the seismic response of reduced-scale reinforced soil retaining walls , 2007 .

[6]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Experimental design, instrumentation and interpretation of reinforced soil wall response using a shaking table , 2004 .

[7]  Edward J Hoppe.  Field Study of Integral Backwall with Elastic Inclusion , 2005 .

[8]  Mustafa Aytekin,et al.  Laboratory study of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam used with expansive soils , 2008 .

[9]  A Mcgown,et al.  INFLUENCE OF WALL YIELDING ON LATERAL STRESSES IN UNREINFORCED AND REINFORCED FILLS , 1987 .

[10]  Zhi-liang Wang,et al.  Numerical analysis of attenuation effect of EPS geofoam on stress-waves in civil defense engineering , 2006 .

[11]  Hemanta Hazarika,et al.  Seismic Stability Enhancement of Rigid Nonyielding Structures , 2003 .

[12]  Kianoosh Hatami,et al.  Seismic Response Analysis of a Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall , 1998 .

[13]  O. Matsuo,et al.  SHAKING TABLE TESTS AND ANALYSES OF GEOSYNTHETIC-REINFORCED SOIL RETAINING WALLS , 1998 .

[14]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Facing contribution to seismic response of reduced-scale reinforced soil walls , 2005 .

[15]  Charles E. Via,et al.  EARTH FORCE REDUCTION BY A SYNTHETIC COMPRESSIBLE INCLUSION , 2000 .

[16]  Susumu Iai,et al.  SIMILITUDE FOR SHAKING TABLE TESTS ON SOIL-STRUCTURE-FLUID MODEL IN 1g GRAVITATIONAL FIELD , 1989 .

[17]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Numerical investigation of controlled yielding of soil-retaining wall structures , 1992 .

[18]  Hemanta Hazarika.  Mitigation of seismic hazard on retaining structures - A numerical experiment , 2001 .

[19]  Edward J Hoppe.  Field Measurements on Skewed Semi-Integral Bridge with Elastic Inclusion: Instrumentation Report , 2006 .

[20]  Hemanta Hazarika,et al.  Modeling the behavior of a hybrid interactive system involving soil, structure and EPS geofoam , 2004 .

[21]  M. Bolton.  THE STRENGTH AND DILATANCY OF SANDS , 1986 .

[22]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Experimental investigation of EPS geofoam seismic buffers using shaking table tests , 2007 .

[23]  W. D. Liam Finn,et al.  Seismic Pressures Against Rigid Walls , 1996 .

[24]  Hemanta Hazarika,et al.  An Analysis Model for a Hybrid Interactive System Involving Compressible Buffer Material , 2002 .

[25]  S. Kramer.  Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering , 1996 .