Time course and temporal order of changes in movement kinematics during learning of fast and accurate elbow flexions

Abstract Learning of a motor task, such as making accurate goal-directed movements, is associated with a number of changes in limb kinematics and in the EMG activity that produces the movement. Some of these changes include increases in movement velocity, improvements in end-point accuracy, and the development of a biphasic/triphasic EMG pattern for fast movements. One question that has remained unanswered is whether the time course of the learning-related changes in movement parameters is similar for all parameters. The present paper focuses on this question and presents evidence that different parameters evolve with a specific temporal order. Neurologically normal subjects were trained to make horizontal, planar movements of the elbow that were both fast and accurate. The performance of the subjects was monitored over the course of 400 movements made during experiments lasting approximately 1.5 h. We measured time-related parameters (duration of acceleration, duration of deceleration, and movement duration) and amplitude-related parameters (peak acceleration, peak deceleration, peak velocity), as well as movement distance. In addition, each subject’s reaction time and EMG activity was monitored. We found that reaction time was the parameter that changed the fastest and that reached a steady baseline earliest. Time-related parameters decreased at a somewhat slower rate and plateaued next. Amplitude-related parameters were slowest in reaching steady-state values. In subjects making the fastest movements, a triphasic EMG patterns was observed to develop. Our findings reveal that movement parameters change with different time courses during the process of motor learning. The results are discussed in terms of the neural substrates that may be responsible for the differences in this aspect of motor learning and skill acquisition.

[1]  Karl U. Smith,et al.  Dimensional analysis of motion: VI. The component movements of assembly motions. , 1953 .

[2]  H. E. Rosvold,et al.  Behavioral effects of selective ablation of the caudate nucleus. , 1967, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[3]  R W Wirta,et al.  Muscle synergies in motor performance. , 1968, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  A Study of the Variability of Human Operator Performance Based on the Crossover Model , 1970 .

[5]  H. E. Rosvold,et al.  The effects of selective caudate lesions in infant and juvenile Rhesus monkeys. , 1972, Brain research.

[6]  J. Vorro.  Stroboscopic study of motion changes that accompany modifications and improvements in a throwing performance. , 1973, Research quarterly.

[7]  D J Glencross,et al.  Temporal organization in a repetitive speed skill. , 1973, Ergonomics.

[8]  J. Vorro,et al.  Electromyographic analysis of the intermittent modifications occurring during the acquisition of a novel throwing skill , 1974 .

[9]  E. C. Poulton,et al.  Tracking skill and manual control , 1974 .

[10]  M. Hallett,et al.  EMG analysis of stereotyped voluntary movements in man. , 1975, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[11]  Hobart Dj,et al.  Modifications occurring during acquisition of a novel throwing task. , 1975 .

[12]  S. Grillner,et al.  The adaptation to speed in human locomotion , 1979, Brain Research.

[13]  P McGrain,et al.  Trends in selected kinematic and myoelectric variables associated with learning a novel motor task. , 1980, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[14]  J. Cooke.  11 The Organization of Simple, Skilled Movements , 1980 .

[15]  Ian M. Franks,et al.  Consistency and error in motor performance , 1982 .

[16]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[17]  D. Ludwig.  EMG changes during acquisition of a motor skill. , 1982, American journal of physical medicine.

[18]  H. Freund.  Motor unit and muscle activity in voluntary motor control. , 1983, Physiological reviews.

[19]  G. Sage,et al.  Motor Learning and Control: A Neuropsychological Approach , 1984 .

[20]  L. Stark,et al.  Roles of the elements of the triphasic control signal , 1985, Experimental Neurology.

[21]  J C Rothwell,et al.  Scaling of the size of the first agonist EMG burst during rapid wrist movements in patients with Parkinson's disease. , 1986, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  R. Marteniuk,et al.  Kinematic and electromyographic changes that occur as a function of learning a time-constrained aiming task. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[23]  W G Darling,et al.  Movement related EMGs become more variable during learning of fast accurate movements. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[24]  Richard F. Thompson.  The neural basis of basic associative learning of discrete behavioral responses , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[25]  C. Dugas,et al.  Strategy and learning effects on perturbed movements: an electromyographic and kinematic study , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[26]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  S. Keele,et al.  Timing Functions of The Cerebellum , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  M. Hallett,et al.  Motor learning in patients with cerebellar dysfunction. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Practice effects on the preprogramming of discrete movements in Parkinson's disease. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[30]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Organizing principles for single-joint movements. IV. Implications for isometric contractions. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  J. Bloedel,et al.  Substrates for Motor Learning Does the Cerebellum Do It All? a , 1991, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[32]  M. Nissen,et al.  Procedural learning is impaired in Huntington's disease: Evidence from the serial reaction time task , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  W T Thach,et al.  The cerebellum and the adaptive coordination of movement. , 1992, Annual review of neuroscience.

[34]  Mitchell Glickstein,et al.  The cerebellum and motor learning , 1992, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[35]  S. Jaric,et al.  Principles for learning single-joint movements. I. Enhanced performance by practice. , 1993, Experimental brain research.

[36]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Evidence for dissociable motor skills in Huntington’s disease patients , 1993, Psychobiology.

[37]  M. Ito.  Synaptic plasticity in the cerebellar cortex and its role in motor learning. , 1993, The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques.

[38]  D. Balota,et al.  Implicit Memory and the Formation of New Associations in Nondemented Parkinson′s Disease Individuals and Individuals with Senile Dementia of the Alzheimer Type: A Serial Reaction Time (SRT) Investigation , 1993, Brain and Cognition.

[39]  W. Kroll,et al.  Rapid movement kinematic and electromyographic control characteristics in males and females. , 1993, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[40]  M. Hallett,et al.  Procedural learning in Parkinson's disease and cerebellar degeneration , 1993, Annals of neurology.

[41]  Principles for learning single-joint movements. II. Generalizing a learned behavior. , 1993, Experimental brain research.

[42]  Adaptation of arm movements in cerebellar and olivary diseases , 1993 .

[43]  W. T. Thach.  Motor Learning and Synaptic Plasticity in the Cerebellum: On the specific role of the cerebellum in motor learning and cognition: Clues from PET activation and lesion studies in man , 1997 .

[44]  T. Ebner,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of cerebellar activation during the learning of a visuomotor dissociation task , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[45]  J. Boucher,et al.  Practice effects on the timing and magnitude of antagonist activity during ballistic elbow flexion to a target. , 1998, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.