National Union Effectiveness in Organizing: Measures and Influences

The percentage of the U.S. work force that is unionized is at its lowest level in more than 50 years. Although many studies have sought the reasons for this decline, few have investigated characteristics of unions themselves as possible factors. This paper focuses on unions as organizations, and applies a model of national union effectiveness to union organizing. The authors propose a composite measure of organizing effectiveness that goes beyond union success in representation elections. An analysis of data from the 1990 National Union Survey and other sources, with controls for environmental influences, suggests that organizing effectiveness is enhanced by innovation and reduced by centralization of control at the national level. Some evidence is also found that internal union democracy enhances union success in organizing.

[1]  B. Hirsch,et al.  Union Membership and Coverage Files from the Current Population Surveys: Note , 1993 .

[2]  J. A. Craft.  Unions, bureaucracy, and change: Old dogs learn new tricksVery slowly , 1991 .

[3]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[4]  Thomas A. Kochan,et al.  An introduction to collective bargaining and industrial relations, Katz and Kochan, 3rd edition , 1991 .

[5]  D. Cherrington,et al.  The management of human resources , 1991 .

[6]  Joseph B. Rose,et al.  New Measures of Union Organizing Effectiveness , 1990 .

[7]  R. Atkin,et al.  UNIONS, POLITICAL ACTION, AND PUBLIC POLICIES: A REVIEW OF THE PAST DECADE , 1989 .

[8]  Thomas F. Reed,et al.  Do Union Organizers Matter? Individual Differences, Campaign Practices, and Representation Election Outcomes , 1989 .

[9]  M. Kleiner,et al.  Employer Behavior in the Face of Union Organizing Drives , 1988 .

[10]  S. Deviney.  The Decline of Organized Labor in the United States.Michael Goldfield , 1988 .

[11]  Thomas A. Kochan,et al.  The Transformation of American Industrial Relations , 1988 .

[12]  M. Goldfield,et al.  The Decline of Organized Labor in the United States , 1988, American Political Science Review.

[13]  Cheryl L. Maranto,et al.  THE CONTEMPORARY DECLINE OF UNION STRENGTH , 1987 .

[14]  Cheryl L. Maranto,et al.  The Effect of Union Characteristics on the Outcome of NLRB Certification Elections , 1987 .

[15]  R. Freeman.  The Effect of the Union Wage Differential on Management Opposition and Union Organizing Success , 1985 .

[16]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[17]  G. Strauss.  Union Government in the U.S.: Research Past and Future , 1977 .

[18]  D. Bok,et al.  Labor and the American community , 1971 .

[19]  Margaret Davis Cate,et al.  In Memory Of , 2019, Every Day I Write the Book.

[20]  R. Hurd,et al.  Reinventing an Organizing Union: Strategies for Change , 1994 .

[21]  T. Juravich,et al.  Seeds of Resurgence: The Promise of Organizing in the Public and Private Sectors , 1994 .

[22]  Glenn W. Perusek.  The internal politics of trade unions : the neglected view of Sidney and Beatrice Webb , 1993 .

[23]  G. Strauss,et al.  The state of the unions , 1993 .

[24]  Robert Muehlenkamp.  Organizing Never Stops , 1991 .

[25]  James L. Medoff,et al.  What Do Unions Do , 1986 .

[26]  Courtney D. Gifford.  Directory of U.S. Labor organizations , 1982 .

[27]  Orley Ashenfelter,et al.  Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations , 1982 .

[28]  M. Warner.  Unions as Complex Organizations : Strategy, Structure and the Need for Administrative Innovation , 1975 .

[29]  Kendra Coates.  The New Unionism , 1972 .