Identification, Interpretation—Evaluation, Response: An alternative framework for analyzing teacher discourse in science

Although research has come to recognize the importance of studying classroom-based student–teacher discourse in science, the emphasis remains largely on teachers' abilities to ask questions and provide students with feedback, or on students' abilities to ask questions or engage in argumentative discourse. Consequently, little research has focused on the discourse elements relating to teacher–student discourse interactions. In this article, we argue for a shift of research attention toward describing what the teacher is responding to (Identification of student inquiry), the process of deciding how to respond (Interpretation—Evaluation of student inquiry), and how the teacher is responding (Response to student inquiry). We propose a new methodological approach for studying teacher discourse, which involves a framework we developed while analyzing 1,385 minutes of fifth grade, whole-class science conversations covering a 2-year period and facilitated by an experienced science teacher. Then, as a case in point, we applied our framework to the teacher discourse data of the study, aiming to show that the framework can be a useful tool for examining how a teacher supports students' inquiry.

[1]  Eduardo Fleury Mortimer,et al.  Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms , 2003 .

[2]  M. Watts,et al.  Questions of Understanding: Categorising Pupils' Questions in Science. , 1997 .

[3]  Christine Chin Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking , 2006 .

[4]  Christine Chin,et al.  Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science , 2002 .

[5]  Santine Cuccio-Schirripa,et al.  Enhancement and Analysis of Science Question Level for Middle School Students , 2000 .

[6]  R. A. Engle,et al.  Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom , 2002 .

[7]  J. Wertsch Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action , 1992 .

[8]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  Providing High School Chemistry Students with Opportunities to Develop Learning Skills in an Inquiry-Type Laboratory: A Case Study. Research Report. , 2004 .

[9]  M. Pressley,et al.  Discourse Patterns and Collaborative Scientific Reasoning in Peer and Teacher-Guided Discussions , 1999 .

[10]  Clotilde Pontecorvo,et al.  Children's Talk in Classroom Discussions , 1992 .

[11]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  The Role of Target Students in the Science Classroom. , 1987 .

[12]  D. Hymes Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life , 2009 .

[13]  E. Mortimer,et al.  Dialogic/Authoritative Discourse and Modelling in a High School Teaching Sequence on Optics , 2005 .

[14]  Jim Minstrell,et al.  Using Questioning to Guide Student Thinking , 1997 .

[15]  Gregory J. Kelly,et al.  Meaning making in secondary science classrooms , 2005 .

[16]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  RESEARCH REPORT , 2004 .

[17]  Philip Scott,et al.  The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons , 2006 .

[18]  Y. Dori,et al.  Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environmental case study , 1999 .

[19]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[20]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science , 2010 .

[21]  E. Jones. The language of the classroom. , 1983, Nursing mirror.

[22]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science , 2004 .

[23]  Jane Sunderland,et al.  New understandings of gender and language classroom research: texts, teacher talk and student talk , 2000 .

[24]  Gerry Philipsen,et al.  Speaking Culturally: Explorations in Social Communication , 1992 .

[25]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[26]  W. Carlsen Questioning in Classrooms: A Sociolinguistic Perspective , 1991 .

[27]  A. Graesser,et al.  Question Asking During Tutoring , 1994 .

[28]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Teacher questioning in an open‐inquiry learning environment: Interactions of context, content, and student responses , 1996 .

[29]  P. Scott Teacher Talk and Meaning Making in Science Classrooms: a Vygotskian Analysis and Review , 1998 .

[30]  J. T. Dillon The remedial status of student questioning , 1988 .

[31]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Supporting Argumentation Through Students' Questions: Case Studies in Science Classrooms , 2010 .

[32]  E. V. Zee,et al.  Analysis of a student-generated inquiry discussion , 2000 .

[33]  Michael Shodell,et al.  The Question-Driven Classroom: Student Questions as Course Curriculum in Biology. , 1995 .

[34]  J. Osborne,et al.  Students' questions: a potential resource for teaching and learning science , 2008 .

[35]  J. Sinclair,et al.  Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils , 1975 .

[36]  T. Good,et al.  Student Passivity: A Study of Question Asking in K-12 Classrooms. , 1987 .

[37]  J. Kleifgen Prekindergarten children's second discourse learning , 1990 .

[38]  Wolfgang Lörscher,et al.  Classroom discourse. The language of teaching and learning , 1990 .

[39]  Phil Scott,et al.  Learning from and responding to students' questions: The authoritative and dialogic tension , 2009 .

[40]  Yury M. Lotman,et al.  Text within a Text , 1988 .

[41]  M. Gall Synthesis of Research on Teachers' Questioning. , 1984 .

[42]  R. Duschl,et al.  Strategies and Challenges to Changing the Focus of Assessment and Instruction in Science Classrooms. , 1997 .

[43]  H. Mehan,et al.  Learning Lessons, Social Organization in the Classroom , 1979 .

[44]  Daniel T. Hickey,et al.  Classroom Discourse as a Tool to Enhance Formative Assessment and Practise in Science , 2007 .

[45]  J. Lemke Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .

[46]  Rachel Mamlok-Naaman,et al.  Developing students' ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories , 2005 .

[47]  David Hammer,et al.  Student Inquiry in a Physics Class Discussion , 1995 .

[48]  Christine Chin Classroom Interaction in Science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses , 2006 .

[49]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Common Knowledge: The Development of Understanding in the Classroom , 1987 .

[50]  D. Westgate,et al.  Identifying 'Quality' in Classroom Talk: An Enduring Research Task , 1997 .

[51]  Emily H. van Zee,et al.  Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science , 2001 .