Environmental and management factors affecting the welfare of chickens on commercial farms in the United Kingdom and Denmark stocked at five densities.

Data from a large commercial-scale experiment in which 10 major broiler producer companies stocked whole houses of birds at 30, 34, 38, 42, and 46 kg/m2 were analyzed to identify 1) temperature and humidity profiles achieved throughout the growth cycle, 2) management practices and equipment that contributed to observed variation in environmental conditions, and 3) the extent to which environmental variables affected bird welfare. The study involved a total of 2.7 million birds in 114 houses on commercial farms with measurement of a wide range of environmental and bird variables. Much of the variation in broiler health and welfare was associated with the percentage of time a company could maintain house temperature and RH within limits recommended by the breeder company. RH in the first week of life was particularly important to later health, suggesting that better control of humidity might lead to improved welfare. Key management factors affecting bird welfare were those relating to good ventilation and air control such as the type of ventilation, type of drinker, numbers of stockmen, and litter type. Controlling the environment, particularly temperature, humidity, and air and litter quality, is crucial to broiler chicken welfare. This does not mean that stocking density is unimportant, but lowering stocking density on its own, without regard to the environment the birds experience, is not sufficient. Genuine improvements in bird welfare will come from setting standards that combine stocking density, safeguards on the environment, and the genetic makeup of the birds.

[1]  A. Hall The Effect of Stocking Density on the Welfare and Behaviour of Broiler Chickens Reared Commercially , 2001, Animal Welfare.

[2]  C. Berg,et al.  Monitoring Animal Welfare on Commercial Broiler Farms in Sweden , 2001 .

[3]  W. Bessei,et al.  Effect of stocking density of broilers on temperature in the litter and at bird level. , 2000 .

[4]  W. D. Weaver,et al.  The effect of different levels of relative humidity and air movement on litter conditions, ammonia levels, growth, and carcass quality for broiler chickens. , 1991, Poultry science.

[5]  F. Pol,et al.  Risk factors for foot-pad dermatitis in chicken and turkey broilers in France. , 2002, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[6]  P. Hester The role of environment and management on leg abnormalities in meat-type fowl. , 1994, Poultry science.

[7]  J. Cockrem,et al.  Faecal measurements of oestradiol and testosterone allow the non-invasive estimation of plasma steroid concentrations in the domestic fowl. , 1994, British poultry science.

[8]  J. Robertson,et al.  Review of the effect of ammonia and dust concentrations on broiler performance , 2003 .

[9]  J. Feddes,et al.  Broiler performance, body weight variance, feed and water intake, and carcass quality at different stocking densities. , 2002, Poultry science.

[10]  Burgess,et al.  The preferences of laying hens for different concentrations of atmospheric ammonia. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[11]  V. Sørensen Report of the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare (EU Commisison, Adopted 11 October 1999). The modification of Technical Annexes of Council Directive 64/432/EEC to take account of Scientific Developments regarding Tuberculosis, Brucellosis and Enzootic Bovine Leucosis. , 1999 .

[12]  C. Wathes,et al.  Avoidance of atmospheric ammonia by domestic fowl and the effect of early experience , 2005 .

[13]  J. Jarp,et al.  Factors associated with mortality in Norwegian broiler flocks. , 2002, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[14]  S. Kestin,et al.  Effects of age and stocking density on leg weakness in broiler chickens. , 2000, Poultry science.

[15]  O. Krone,et al.  Measurement of plasma corticosterone and fecal glucocorticoid metabolites in the chicken (Gallus domesticus), the great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), and the goshawk (Accipiter gentilis). , 2003, General and comparative endocrinology.

[16]  J. McLean,et al.  Welfare of Male and Female Broiler Chickens in Relation to Stocking Density, as Indicated by Performance, Health and Behaviour , 2002, Animal Welfare.

[17]  C. Berg,et al.  A Comparison Between Leg Problems in Danish and Swedish Broiler Production , 2003, Animal Welfare.

[18]  C. Donnelly,et al.  Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density , 2004, Nature.

[19]  H. H. Kristensen,et al.  Ammonia and poultry welfare: a review , 2000 .