Retrieving relatives from historical data

Variation and change in relativization strategies has been well documented (e.g. Ball 1996: 46, Biber and Clark 2002, Biber, Johansson, Leech, Conrad and Finegan 1999, Johansson 2006, Lehmann 2002). Certain types of relative clause, namely that-relatives and zero relatives, were difficult to retrieve from plain-text corpora. Studies therefore either relied on manual extraction of data or a subset of possible relativization strategies. In some text types, however, the zero relative is an important member of the class of possible relativizers. Recent advances in syntactic annotation should have made that-relatives and zero relatives more accessible to automatic retrieval. In this article, we test precision and recall of searches on a modest-sized corpus, i.e. scientific texts from ARCHER (A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers), as a preliminary to future work on the large corpora which are increasingly becoming available. The parser retrieved some false positives and at the same time missed some relevant data. We discuss structural reasons for both kinds of shortcoming as well as the possibilities and limitations of parser adaptation.

[1]  Hans Martin Lehmann.  Zero subject relative constructions in American and British English , 2002 .

[2]  Catherine N. Ball.  A Diachronic Study of Relative Markers in Spoken and Written English. , 1996 .

[3]  Rodney Huddleston.  Non-finite and Verbless Clauses , 2002 .

[4]  Beatrice Santorini,et al.  Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank , 1993, CL.

[5]  Gerold Schneider,et al.  Parser-based analysis of syntax-lexis interactions , 2009 .

[6]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Historical shifts in modification patterns with complex noun phrase structures , 2002 .

[7]  Gerold Schneider,et al.  Relative complexity in scientific discourse , 2012, English Language and Linguistics.

[8]  Catherine N. Ball.  Automated Text Analysis: Cautionary Tales , 1993 .

[9]  Magnus Huber,et al.  Syntactic and variational complexity in British and Ghanaian English Relative clause formation in the written parts of the International Corpus of English , 2012 .

[10]  Christine Johansson.  Nineteenth-century English: Relativizers in nineteenth-century English , 2006 .

[11]  Gerold Schneider.  Adapting a parser to historical English , 2012 .

[12]  Ted Briscoe,et al.  Parser evaluation: using a grammatical relation annotation scheme , 2003 .

[13]  Randolph Quirk,et al.  Relative clauses in educated spoken English 1 , 1957 .

[14]  Matti Rissanen,et al.  The choice of relative pronouns in 17th century American English. , 1984 .

[15]  I. Sag.  English relative clause constructions , 1997, Journal of Linguistics.

[16]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Relative Constructions and Unbounded Dependencies , 2002 .

[17]  Gerold Schneider,et al.  Using a parser as a heuristic tool for the description of New Englishes , 2009 .

[18]  Nuria Yanez Bouza,et al.  ARCHER: past and present (1990-2010) , 2011 .