Female Computer Scientists Needed: Approaches For Closing The Gender Gap

Despite great effort in research and teaching as well as in raising women’s quotas in the public sector and in enterprises, a gender gap in computer science can still be observed. The reasons are manifold, including the lack of interest of girls because of existing stereotypes of male nerds, misconceptions in the field of computer science, and concrete differences in students’ self-concept and performance. Girls do not choose schools or studies in the field of computer science because working on computers or coding is unattractive to them. Research shows poorer performance, missing interest, and lower self-concept for girls in secondary computing education as well as a high dropout rate of female students in computer science courses at the bachelor’s level. Software development exams contribute to those high dropout rates, and women often choose a different subject or even stop their university education altogether. This leads to fewer female employees in the field of computer science, and this situation calls for special measures at several levels. The current paper provides an overview of the initiatives of our university that aim to address several aspects of the gender gap. The programs offered aim to (1) increase interest in computer science and recruit (highly) gifted girls for our talent programs, (2) recruit and support female bachelor’s and master’s students in computer science, and (3) redesign programming courses and teaching materials to reduce the gender gap in performance and support, especially for female students. This study also describes a "cyber tutoring" program in which highly gifted girls between 13 and 16 years collaborate with and are supervised by female role models in higher positions in STEM. The evaluation results gained in the first year of this case study are promising and suggest that the extension and further development of the program would be advantageous.

[1]  Gerhard Roth,et al.  Warum sind Lehren und Lernen so schwierig , 2003 .

[2]  C. Porter,et al.  Gender Differences in the Choice of Major: The Importance of Female Role Models , 2020, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.

[3]  Barbara Sabitzer,et al.  Peer-learning and Talents Exchange in Programming: Experiences and Challenges , 2020, CSEDU.

[4]  Seong Won Han,et al.  National education systems and gender gaps in STEM occupational expectations , 2016 .

[5]  David A. Sousa How the Gifted Brain Learns , 1998 .

[6]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[7]  Kirsti Ala-Mutka,et al.  A study of the difficulties of novice programmers , 2005, ITiCSE '05.

[8]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Teaching the Nintendo generation to program , 2002, CACM.

[9]  Linda J. Sax,et al.  Women planning to major in computer science: Who are they and what makes them unique? , 2016, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[10]  EunKyoung Lee,et al.  The Impact of a Peer-Learning Agent Based on Pair Programming in a Programming Course , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[11]  Linda J. Sax,et al.  “But I’m Not Good at Math”: The Changing Salience of Mathematical Self-Concept in Shaping Women’s and Men’s STEM Aspirations , 2015, Research in Higher Education.

[12]  Barbara Sabitzer,et al.  Brain-based teaching in computer science: neurodidactical proposals for effective teaching , 2013, Koli Calling '13.

[13]  A. Astin,et al.  The Gender Gap in College: Maximizing the Developmental Potential of Women and Men , 2008 .

[14]  J. Gordon,et al.  From the World Economic Forum , 2010 .

[15]  Claudia Szabo,et al.  Broadening participation not border protection: how universities can support women in computer science , 2017 .

[16]  Peter Mozelius,et al.  The Gap between "Generation Y" and Lifelong Learners in Programming Courses – How to Bridge Between Different Learning Styles? , 2012 .

[17]  Johannes Sametinger,et al.  COOL Programming: Improving Introductory Programming Education through Cooperative Open Learning , 2020, International Conference on Educational and Information Technology.

[18]  Aytaç Göğüş Peer learning and assessment , 2012 .