Assessing the Impact of Mixed Reality Immersion on Presence and Embodiment

When placed inside an immersive virtual simulation, subjects will tend to experience the feeling of being ’really there’ and to respond realistically to their environment, forgetting that it is not real. This behaviour is observed when subjects experience a high sense of presence, the sensation of being in a real place and that the scenario being depicted to them is real. Here we present an experiment designed to evaluate the impact of different levels of immersion, and of different blending of virtual and real objects and body representations, on participant’s subjective experience. Presence is evaluated with an innovative method combining the random introduction of breaks-in-presence (BiP) with a rapid decision-making test. Results show that the level of immersion impacts both the Sense of Presence (SoP) and the Sense of Embodiment (SoE), that the BiP has a limited impact on the SoE without breaking it, and that the level of confidence in the decision test correlates with both the SoP and the SoE.

[1]  Mel Slater,et al.  How Colorful Was Your Day? Why Questionnaires Cannot Assess Presence in Virtual Environments , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[2]  J. Millán,et al.  Disentangling the origins of confidence in speeded perceptual judgments through multimodal imaging , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Mel Slater,et al.  Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Concepción Perpiñá,et al.  Presence and Reality Judgment in Virtual Environments: A Unitary Construct? , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[5]  RealityCheck , 2019, Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

[6]  Mel Slater,et al.  The virtual ante-room: assessing presence through expectation and surprise , 1998 .

[7]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[8]  Ayse Bilgin,et al.  Making it Real: A Study of Augmented Virtuality on Presence and Enhanced Benefits of Study Stress Reduction Sessions , 2020, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[9]  J. Millán,et al.  Disentangling the origins of confidence in speeded perceptual judgments through multimodal imaging , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Eyal Ofek,et al.  RealityCheck: Blending Virtual Environments with Situated Physical Reality , 2019, CHI.

[12]  Pamela J. Wisniewski,et al.  In Limbo: The Effect of Gradual Visual Transition Between Real and Virtual on Virtual Body Ownership Illusion and Presence , 2018, 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR).

[13]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  First Person Experience of Body Transfer in Virtual Reality , 2010, PloS one.

[14]  Mel Slater,et al.  The Influence of Body Movement on Subjective Presence in Virtual Environments , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[15]  R. Salomon,et al.  UnReal? Investigating the Sense of Reality and Psychotic Symptoms with Virtual Reality , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[16]  Pamela J. Wisniewski,et al.  RealME: the influence of body and hand representations on body ownership and presence , 2017, SUI.

[17]  Mel Slater,et al.  Using Presence Questionnaires in Reality , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.