Study on Flexural Behavior of Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Sandwich Composites Using Liquid Thermoplastic Resin

Experimental and numerical studies of composite sandwich structures are warranted to reap the benefits of these materials when they are well designed. In the current research, new liquid thermoplastic and epoxy resins were used to fabricate four composite sandwich panels with two additional foam types and different densities in the wind turbine industry. A comprehensive comparison of three-point bending test results was made. Finite-element-based simulations using the ABAQUS program with Hashin’s damage criterion were conducted to examine the failure behavior of the GFRP sandwich composites. The flexural behavior of the glass-fiber-reinforced plastic (GFRP) sandwich panels was investigated and compared with the experiments. The results show that the GF/PVC/Elium composite panel gives the highest load absorption, flexural strength, flexural modulus, core shear ultimate strength, and facing stress due to effect of the core foam and resin types. For the PVC foam core sandwich panel, using thermoplastic resin increased the flexural strength by 18% compared to that of the epoxy resin. The simulation results show excellent agreement between the finite-element-predicted failure loads and the experimental results.

[1]  D. Thambiratnam,et al.  Geometrically modified auxetic polyurethane foams and their potential application in impact mitigation of masonry structures , 2021, Construction and Building Materials.

[2]  Youngsoo Lee,et al.  PET/Bio-Based Terpolyester Blends with High Dimensional Thermal Stability , 2021, Polymers.

[3]  Z. Guan,et al.  A review of the recent trends on core structures and impact response of sandwich panels , 2021 .

[4]  J. Xiong,et al.  New advances in fiber-reinforced composite honeycomb materials , 2020, Science China Technological Sciences.

[5]  Tao Jie,et al.  Flexural properties of a novel foam core sandwich structure reinforced by stiffeners , 2020 .

[6]  A. Pandey,et al.  Flexural deformation behavior of carbon fiber reinforced aluminium hybrid foam sandwich structure , 2020 .

[7]  V. Altstädt,et al.  Mechanical performance of CF/PEEK–PEI foam core sandwich structures , 2019 .

[8]  Qi Huang,et al.  A comparative study of blast resistance of cylindrical sandwich panels with aluminum foam and auxetic honeycomb cores , 2019, Aerospace Science and Technology.

[9]  F. Scarpa,et al.  Shear Stiffness and Energy Absorption of Auxetic Open Cell Foams as Sandwich Cores , 2018, physica status solidi (b).

[10]  Yu Bai,et al.  Fiber reinforced composites sandwich panels with web reinforced wood core for building floor applications , 2018, Composites Part B: Engineering.

[11]  C. Berggreen,et al.  Mode mixity analysis of face/core debonds in a single cantilever beam sandwich specimen , 2018, Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials.

[12]  Limin Bao,et al.  Improving bending characteristics of FRP sandwich structures with reinforcement webs , 2018 .

[13]  Yang Sun,et al.  Bending behavior of composite sandwich structures with graded corrugated truss cores , 2018 .

[14]  C. Kaboglu.  The effect of different types of core material on the flexural behavior of sandwich composites for wind turbine blades , 2017 .

[15]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Shell elements with through-the-thickness variable kinematics for the analysis of laminated composite and sandwich structures , 2017 .

[16]  Brahim Benmokrane,et al.  State-of-the-art review on FRP sandwich systems for lightweight civil infrastructure , 2017 .

[17]  Yong Li,et al.  Experimental study on the dynamic response of foam-filled corrugated core sandwich panels subjected to air blast loading , 2016 .

[18]  B. Benmokrane,et al.  Flexural behavior of an FRP sandwich system with glass-fiber skins and a phenolic core at elevated in-service temperature , 2016 .

[19]  A. Komorek,et al.  Sandwich Structured Composites for Aeronautics: Methods of Manufacturing Affecting Some Mechanical Properties , 2016 .

[20]  Paola Marchese,et al.  The aliphatic counterpart of PET, PPT and PBT aromatic polyesters: effect of the molecular structure on thermo-mechanical properties , 2016 .

[21]  Yuan Liu,et al.  Three-point bending performance of a new aluminum foam composite structure , 2016 .

[22]  E. Morozov,et al.  Behaviour of PU-foam/glass-fibre composite sandwich panels under flexural static load , 2015 .

[23]  E. Morozov,et al.  Experimental, Theoretical and Numerical Investigation of the Flexural Behaviour of the Composite Sandwich Panels with PVC Foam Core , 2014, Applied Composite Materials.

[24]  Chun H. Wang,et al.  Improving the bending strength and energy absorption of corrugated sandwich composite structure , 2013 .

[25]  B. Gu,et al.  Damage Behaviors of Foam Sandwiched Composite Materials Under Quasi-Static Three-point Bending , 2013, Applied Composite Materials.

[26]  Na Wang,et al.  Tortuously structured polyvinyl chloride/polyurethane fibrous membranes for high-efficiency fine particulate filtration. , 2013, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[27]  M. Giglio,et al.  Numerical investigation of a three point bending test on sandwich panels with aluminum skins and Nomex™ honeycomb core , 2012 .

[28]  Martin Eerme,et al.  Design and Testing of Sandwich Structures with Different Core Materials , 2012 .

[29]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  A computational procedure for prebending of wind turbine blades , 2012 .

[30]  M. Haq,et al.  Experimental and numerical characterizations of flexural behavior of VARTM-infused composite sandwich structures , 2012 .

[31]  N. Petrinic,et al.  The mechanical response of Rohacell foams at different length scales , 2011 .

[32]  N. Fleck,et al.  Quasi-Static Three-Point Bending of Carbon Fiber Sandwich Beams With Square Honeycomb Cores , 2011 .

[33]  C. Atas,et al.  On the impact response of sandwich composites with cores of balsa wood and PVC foam , 2010 .

[34]  H. Fang,et al.  Flexural properties of grooved perforation sandwich composites , 2010 .

[35]  C. Santiuste,et al.  FEM analysis of dynamic flexural behaviour of composite sandwich beams with foam core , 2010 .

[36]  N. Rayess,et al.  Characterization of aluminum foam–polypropylene interpenetrating phase composites: Flexural test results , 2010 .

[37]  L. Calabrese,et al.  Three-Point Flexural Behaviour of GFRP Sandwich Composites: A Failure Map , 2010 .

[38]  Kim Branner,et al.  Application and Analysis of Sandwich Elements in the Primary Structure of Large Wind Turbine Blades , 2007 .

[39]  C. Borsellino,et al.  Experimental and numerical evaluation of sandwich composite structures , 2004 .

[40]  Norman A. Fleck,et al.  Material selection in sandwich beam construction , 2004 .

[41]  P. Burchill,et al.  The effect of the degree of cure on the corrosion resistance of vinyl ester/glass fibre composites , 2004 .

[42]  L. A. Carlsson,et al.  Influences of Foam Density and Core Thickness on Debond Toughness of Sandwich Specimens with PVC Foam Core , 2003 .

[43]  Sabu Thomas,et al.  Thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity analyses of low-density polyethylene composites reinforced with sisal, glass and intimately mixed sisal/glass fibres , 2000 .

[44]  Jose Maria Kenny,et al.  Impact testing and simulation of composite sandwich structures for civil transportation , 2000 .

[45]  J. Echaabi,et al.  REVIEW OF FAILURE CRITERIA OF FIBROUS COMPOSITE MATERIALS , 1996 .

[46]  Zvi Hashin,et al.  Fatigue Failure Criteria for Unidirectional Fiber Composites , 1981 .

[47]  Z. Hashin,et al.  A Fatigue Failure Criterion for Fiber Reinforced Materials , 1973 .

[48]  X. Ren,et al.  A novel cement-based auxetic foam composite: Experimental study , 2022, Case Studies in Construction Materials.

[49]  V. Piven,et al.  Modern Trends in the Development of Renewable Energy: the Experience of the EU and Leading Countries of the World , 2020, Mechanism of an Economic Regulation.

[50]  C. Elanchezhian,et al.  Review on Sandwich Composite and their Applications , 2019, Materials Today: Proceedings.

[51]  Rakesh Potluri,et al.  Finite Element Analysis ofCellular Foam Core Sandwich Structures , 2017 .

[52]  H. Ijaz,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of Bend Test of Sandwich Structures Using Strain Energy Based Homogenization Method , 2017 .

[53]  A. Riccio,et al.  Multifunctional Polypropylene Core for Aerospace Sandwich Composite Panels , 2016 .

[54]  J. Nunes,et al.  Sandwiched composites in aerospace engineering , 2016 .

[55]  Zhu Dej.  Effects of strain rate and temperature on mechanical properties of Kevlar 49 aramid fabric reinforced epoxy polymers under dynamic tensile loading , 2016 .

[56]  Bo Wang,et al.  Failure mechanism of PMI foam core sandwich beam in bending , 2015 .

[57]  Z. Yue,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Evaluation of Fatigue Behavior of Foam Core Sandwich Structure , 2013 .

[58]  Henri Champliaud,et al.  Three-Point Bending Testing of Sandwich Beams and Finite Element Comparison , 2009 .