Sex Differences and Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Pacemakers

Introduction: Evidence of sex-related differences in patients with pacemakers regarding comorbidities is insufficiently investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship of cardiovascular comorbidities and sex category with properties of pacemaker implantation, pacemaker follow-up, and long-term survival. Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study consisted of 6,362 pacemaker-patients (39.7% female) enrolled between May 2000 and April 2015. Functional pacemaker parameters were registered at regular pacemaker controls. Survival status and cause of death were analyzed in relation to comorbidities, implanted pacing devices, and echocardiography. Survival analyses were plotted for a 10-year follow-up. Results: Patients with hypertension or hyperlipidemia had higher rates of implantations due to sick sinus syndrome (28.6 vs. 25.5% without hypertension, P < 0.001; 30.7 vs. 25.7% without hyperlipidemia, P < 0.001), while endocarditis was associated with higher rates of implantations due to AV block (46.7 vs. 33.4%, P < 0.001). Patients with valvular heart disease had higher rates of pacemaker implantation due to bradycardic atrial fibrillation (24.9 vs. 21.0% without valvular heart disease, P < 0.001). Ventricular pacing threshold increased in both sexes during the follow-up and was higher in women in the final follow-up (0.94 vs. 0.91 V in men, P = 0.002). During the 10-years follow-up, 6.1% of women and 8.6% of men underwent lead replacement (P = 0.054). Device and lead replacement rates were increased if the comorbidities coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, valvular heart disease, previous stroke/TIA, atrial arrhythmias, chronic kidney disease, or endocarditis were present. Diabetes and previous CABG increase the rates of device replacement, but not the rate of lead replacement. Severe tricuspid regurgitation after implantation of pacemaker was present in more men than women (14.4 vs. 6.1%, P < 0.001). In a multivariate COX regression, the following variables were associated with independent decrease of 10-year survival: hypertension (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.09–1.64), chronic kidney disease (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.53–2.19), tricuspid regurgitation after pacemaker implantation (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.26–1.74). Survival was independently increased in female sex (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70–0.99) and hyperlipidemia (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67–0.97). Conclusions: Cardiovascular comorbidities influenced significantly pacemaker implantations and long-term outcome. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT03388281.

[1]  M. Gold,et al.  2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2019, Heart rhythm.

[2]  Ó. Cano Pérez,et al.  Spanish Pacemaker Registry. 15th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Pacing (2017). , 2018, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[3]  M. Gold,et al.  2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  M. Link,et al.  2017 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the evaluation and management of patients with syncope: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2017, Heart rhythm.

[5]  J. Piccini,et al.  Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort , 2017, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[6]  J. Lelakowski,et al.  Gender differences in dual-chamber pacemaker implantation indications and long-term outcomes , 2016 .

[7]  B. Małecka,et al.  Gender differences in dual-chamber pacemaker implantation indications and long-term outcomes. , 2016, Acta cardiologica.

[8]  M. Hobbs,et al.  Life expectancy after implantation of a first cardiac permanent pacemaker (1995-2008): A population-based study. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[9]  S. Aranki,et al.  Sex Differences in the Prevalence of Diastolic Dysfunction in Cardiac Surgical Patients , 2015, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[10]  C. Valzania,et al.  Current use of implantable electrical devices in Sweden: data from the Swedish pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry. , 2015, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[11]  M. Santini,et al.  The Influence of Gender on Heart Rhythm Disease , 2014, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[12]  N. Zuithoff,et al.  Prognosis of the bradycardia pacemaker recipient assessed at first implantation: a nationwide cohort study , 2013, Heart.

[13]  A. Russo,et al.  HRS/ACCF expert consensus statement on pacemaker device and mode selection. Developed in partnership between the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[14]  C. Israel,et al.  Do gender differences exist in pacemaker implantation?--results of an obligatory external quality control program. , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[15]  S. Ouali,et al.  DDD versus VVIR Pacing in Patients, Ages 70 and Over, with Complete Heart Block , 2009, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[16]  G. Caldito,et al.  Gender differences in selection of pacemakers: a single-center study. , 2007, Gender medicine.

[17]  R. Perry,et al.  Mid-term survival after cardiac surgery in elderly patients: analysis of predictors for increased mortality. , 2004, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[18]  G. Lip,et al.  Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[19]  J. Lear,et al.  Prevalance of diabetes in elderly patients requiring permanent cardiac pacemaker insertion , 1996, Acta Diabetologica.

[20]  Manfred Zehender,et al.  Long-term survival after pacemaker implantation. Prognostic importance of gender and baseline patient characteristics. , 2004, European heart journal.

[21]  L. Goldman,et al.  Death in patients with permanent pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome. , 2003, American heart journal.

[22]  J. Steiner,et al.  Gender, age, and heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  R. Charles,et al.  Long-term survival after permanent pacemaker implantation: analysis of predictors for increased mortality. , 2002, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[24]  W. Koenig,et al.  Sex differences in selection of pacemakers: retrospective observational study , 1998, BMJ.

[25]  S. Pinski,et al.  Long‐Term Performance of Endocardial Pacing Leads , 1994, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[26]  K. Belkic,et al.  Survival in 1,431 Pacemaker Patients: Prognostic Factors and Comparison With the General Population , 1992, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[27]  R. Podlaha,et al.  The prevalence of diabetes mellitus and other risk factors of atherosclerosis in bradycardia requiring pacemaker treatment. , 1992, Hormone and metabolic research. Supplement series.

[28]  N. Goldschlager,et al.  Myocardial stimulation threshold in patients with cardiac pacemakers: effect of physiologic variables, pharmacologic agents, and lead electrodes. , 1985, Cardiology clinics.

[29]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .