Integrated innovative product design and supply chain tactical planning within a blockchain platform

In globalised manufacturing and production environments, companies increasingly tend to exploit public contribution advantages within designing, manufacturing and marketing processes. To be benefited from outbound capabilities, this paper presents a tactical supply chain planning model to integrate the designing process in the form of open innovation within the supply chain main processes. In this regard, a fuzzy mathematical model is proposed to optimise the tactical decisions according to supply chain objectives and open innovation considerations. On the other hand, intellectual property issues and protecting the rights of innovators are significant concerns that sometimes avoid companies to be engaged in open innovation initiatives. Therefore, this paper proposes a registering mechanism in which the ideas and creative works are collected, refined and finally approved within a blockchain platform. Furthermore, in order to deal with epistemic environmental uncertainty, the fuzzy set theory is utilised. To investigate the applicability of the developed model, a case study in home appliances domain is employed. The results show that the company can achieve favourable designs by spending approximately 1% of the supply chain total cost. Additionally, benefiting the registering mechanism can decrease the cost of using non-original designs more than 41%.

[1]  Paul Michael Di Gangi,et al.  Getting Customers' Ideas to Work for You: Learning from Dell how to Succeed with Online User Innovation Communities , 2010, MIS Q. Executive.

[2]  Mir Saman Pishvaee,et al.  Robust possibilistic programming for socially responsible supply chain network design: A new approach , 2012, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[3]  Elaine Shi,et al.  Step by Step Towards Creating a Safe Smart Contract: Lessons and Insights from a Cryptocurrency Lab , 2016, Financial Cryptography Workshops.

[4]  J. West,et al.  Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation , 2013 .

[5]  Arati Baliga,et al.  Performance Characterization of Hyperledger Fabric , 2018, 2018 Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology (CVCBT).

[6]  Aleksander Berentsen Aleksander Berentsen Recommends “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System” by Satoshi Nakamoto , 2019, 21st Century Economics.

[7]  Alan Mislove,et al.  Stick a fork in it: Analyzing the Ethereum network partition , 2017, HotNets.

[8]  Suvi Nenonen,et al.  Managing Co‐Creation Design: A Strategic Approach to Innovation , 2015 .

[9]  Žiga Turk,et al.  Potentials of Blockchain Technology for Construction Management , 2017 .

[10]  Mir Saman Pishvaee,et al.  An accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm for sustainable supply chain network design under uncertainty: A case study of medical needle and syringe supply chain , 2014 .

[11]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Blockchain Practices, Potentials, and Perspectives in Greening Supply Chains , 2018, Sustainability.

[12]  John D. C. Little,et al.  On model building , 1993 .

[13]  Yuchen Yang,et al.  Blockchain application in food supply information security , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM).

[14]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[15]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Intellectual property and open innovation: an empirical analysis , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[16]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Intellectual Property , 2003 .

[17]  Alexander Brem,et al.  Open innovation and intellectual property rights: How do SMEs benefit from patents, industrial designs, trademarks and copyrights? , 2017 .

[18]  David Metcalf,et al.  The Hyperledger Project , 2017 .

[19]  M. Zeilinger Digital Art as ‘Monetised Graphics’: Enforcing Intellectual Property on the Blockchain , 2016, Philosophy & Technology.

[20]  Alex Norta,et al.  Designing a Smart-Contract Application Layer for Transacting Decentralized Autonomous Organizations , 2016, ICACDS.

[21]  Martin Curley,et al.  The Evolution of Open Innovation , 2015 .

[22]  R. Pellerin,et al.  The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0 , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[23]  Melanie Swan,et al.  Blockchain Temporality: Smart Contract Time Specifiability with Blocktime , 2016, RuleML.

[24]  O. Gassmann,et al.  The Future of Open Innovation , 2010 .

[25]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon , 2009 .

[26]  M. Freel,et al.  Appropriation strategies and open innovation in SMEs , 2016 .

[27]  Aziz Sheikh,et al.  The case study approach , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[28]  Hyoduk Shin,et al.  Do Firms Invest in Forecasting Efficiently? The Effect of Competition on Demand Forecast Investments and Supply Chain Coordination , 2010, Oper. Res..

[29]  Tamotsu Shibata,et al.  Demand articulation in the open-innovation paradigm , 2015 .

[30]  B. Looy,et al.  Co-Ownership of Intellectual Property: Exploring the Value-Appropriation and Value-Creation Implications of Co-Patenting with Different Partners , 2013 .

[31]  Arne Meeuw,et al.  A Decentralised Sharing App running a Smart Contract on the Ethereum Blockchain , 2016, IOT.

[32]  Antonello Cammarano,et al.  Open innovation and intellectual property: a knowledge-based approach , 2017 .

[33]  Martin Schreier,et al.  The Value of Crowdsourcing: Can Users Really Compete with Professionals in Generating New Product Ideas? , 2009 .

[34]  Sungjoon Lee,et al.  Open Innovation Projects in SMEs as an Engine for Sustainable Growth , 2016 .

[35]  Andrew A. King,et al.  Using Open Innovation to Identify the Best Ideas , 2013 .

[36]  S. Nakamoto,et al.  Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System , 2008 .

[37]  I. Deschamps,et al.  University-SME Collaboration and Open Innovation: Intellectual-Property Management Tools and the Roles of Intermediaries , 2013 .

[38]  Jason Seawright,et al.  Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research , 2008 .

[39]  Kleber Luís Celadon,et al.  Implementing Open Innovation: The Case of Natura, IBM and Siemens , 2013 .

[40]  Guido Perboli,et al.  Blockchain in Logistics and Supply Chain: A Lean Approach for Designing Real-World Use Cases , 2018, IEEE Access.

[41]  J. Gerring,et al.  Case Selection for Case‐Study Analysis: Qualitative and Quantitative Techniques , 2008 .

[42]  E. Huizingh Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives , 2011 .

[43]  Marko Vukolic,et al.  Hyperledger fabric: a distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains , 2018, EuroSys.

[44]  Marcel Bogers,et al.  Open Innovation: Research, Practices, and Policies , 2018 .

[45]  Marshall Sahlins The Conflicts of the Faculty , 2009, Critical Inquiry.

[46]  Nan Meng,et al.  From Bitcoin to cybersecurity: A comparative study of blockchain application and security issues , 2017, 2017 4th International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI).

[47]  Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,et al.  Comprehensive fuzzy multi-objective multi-product multi-site aggregate production planning decisions in a supply chain under uncertainty , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[48]  N. Jazdi,et al.  Cyber physical systems in the context of Industry 4.0 , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics.

[49]  Moritz Petersen,et al.  Blockchain in logistics and supply chain : trick or treat? , 2017 .

[50]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods: Results of a forecasting competition , 1982 .

[51]  Jiann-Min Yang,et al.  Bibliometrics-based evaluation of the Blockchain research trend: 2008 – March 2017 , 2018, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[52]  Mary Lou Maher,et al.  Motivating participation in online innovation communities , 2014, Int. J. Web Based Communities.

[53]  Fernando Deschamps,et al.  Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 - a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[54]  Josefa Mula,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics A fuzzy linear programming based approach for tactical supply chain planning in an uncertainty environment , 2010 .

[55]  Josefa Mula,et al.  Mathematical programming model for centralised master planning in ceramic tile supply chains , 2010 .

[56]  Vipin Tyagi,et al.  Advances in Computing and Data Sciences , 2016, Communications in Computer and Information Science.

[57]  Marly Monteiro de Carvalho,et al.  Evolution of the open innovation paradigm: Towards a contingent conceptual model , 2018, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[58]  Mir Saman Pishvaee,et al.  A Fuzzy Optimization Approach to Integration of Physical and Financial Flows in a Global Supply Chain Under Exchange Rate Uncertainty , 2018, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst..

[59]  David Swanson,et al.  The Supply Chain Has No Clothes: Technology Adoption of Blockchain for Supply Chain Transparency , 2018 .

[60]  Samsung Electronics Co. Samsung v. Apple , 2017 .

[61]  Richard C. Larson,et al.  Model Building in Mathematical Programming , 1979 .

[62]  E. Hassini,et al.  Multi-site production planning integrating procurement and distribution plans in multi-echelon supply chains: an interactive fuzzy goal programming approach , 2009 .

[63]  Elmar Fürst,et al.  Blockchain for and in Logistics: What to Adopt and Where to Start , 2018, Logistics.

[64]  Daren C. Brabham MOVING THE CROWD AT THREADLESS , 2010 .

[65]  Lisa Larsson,et al.  Product-service system innovation capabilities: linkages between the fuzzy front end and subsequent development phases , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[66]  Mir Saman Pishvaee,et al.  A stochastic programming approach toward optimal design and planning of an integrated green biodiesel supply chain network under uncertainty: A case study , 2018, Energy.

[67]  Michele Germani,et al.  Open Innovation for Ideating and Designing New Product Service Systems , 2016 .

[68]  Alan C. Marco,et al.  Patent Litigation Data from US District Court Electronic Records (1963-2015) , 2017 .

[69]  D. Lei,et al.  Collaborative Innovation with Customers: A Review of the Literature and Suggestions for Future Research , 2012 .

[70]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Contracting to Assure Supply: How to Share Demand Forecasts in a Supply Chain , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[71]  S. Ali Torabi,et al.  Integrated material-financial supply chain master planning under mixed uncertainty , 2018, Inf. Sci..

[72]  Mir Saman Pishvaee,et al.  A possibilistic programming approach for closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty , 2010, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[73]  Malte Brettel,et al.  How Virtualization, Decentralization and Network Building Change the Manufacturing Landscape: An Industry 4.0 Perspective , 2014 .

[74]  Mir Saman Pishvaee,et al.  Applications of Fuzzy Mathematical Programming Approaches in Supply Chain Planning Problems , 2016, Fuzzy Logic in Its 50th Year.

[75]  Andrew Urquhart The Inefficiency of Bitcoin , 2016 .

[76]  Li Da Xu,et al.  Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[77]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Blockchain technology: A panacea or pariah for resources conservation and recycling? , 2018 .

[78]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[79]  Ted Farrington Three Ways Blockchain Technology Will Impact R&D Management - Viewpoints on Innovation , 2018 .

[80]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[81]  David Gann,et al.  H. Chesbrough, Open Innovation: The New Imperative For Creating And Profiting From Technology, Harvard Business School Press, 2003 (272 pp., $35.00, ISBN: 1-57851-837-7). , 2005 .

[82]  Mokter Hossain Performance and Potential of Open Innovation Intermediaries , 2012 .

[83]  Ilkka Kauranen,et al.  A comprehensive review of open innovation literature , 2016 .

[84]  Fariborz Jolai,et al.  An integrated weighted fuzzy multi-objective model for supplier selection and order scheduling in a supply chain , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..