The effect of network thresholding and weighting on structural brain networks in the UK Biobank

Whole-brain structural networks can be constructed using diffusion MRI and probabilistic tractography. However, measurement noise and the probabilistic nature of the tracking procedure result in an unknown proportion of spurious white matter connections. Faithful disentanglement of spurious and genuine connections is hindered by a lack of comprehensive anatomical information at the network-level. Therefore, network thresholding methods are widely used to remove ostensibly false connections, but it is not yet clear how different thresholding strategies affect basic network properties and their associations with meaningful demographic variables, such as age. In a sample of 3,153 generally healthy volunteers from the UK Biobank Imaging Study (aged 44—77 years), we constructed 85 × 85 node whole-brain structural networks and applied two principled network thresholding approaches (consistency and proportional thresholding). These were applied over a broad range of threshold levels across six alternative network weightings (streamline count, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity and three novel weightings from neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging) and for four common network measures (mean edge weight, characteristic path length, network efficiency and network clustering coefficient). We compared network measures against age associations and found that the most commonly-used level of proportional-thresholding from the literature (retaining 68.7% of all possible connections) yielded significantly weaker age-associations (0.070 ≤ |β| ≤ 0.406) than the consistency-based approach which retained only 30% of connections (0.140 ≤ |β| ≤ 0.409). However, we determined that the stringency of the threshold was a stronger determinant of the network-age association than the choice of threshold method and the two thresholding approaches identified a highly overlapping set of connections (ICC = 0.84) when matched at a plausible level of network sparsity (70%). Generally, more stringent thresholding resulted in more age-sensitive network measures in five of the six network weightings, except at the highest levels of sparsity (>90%), where crucial connections were then removed. At two commonly-used threshold levels, the age-associations of the connections that were discarded (mean β ≤ |0.068|) were significantly smaller in magnitude than the corresponding age-associations of the connections that were retained (mean β ≤ |0.219|, p < 0.001, uncorrected). Given histological evidence of widespread degeneration of structural brain connectivity with increasing age, these results indicate that stringent thresholding methods may be most accurate in identifying true white matter connections.

[1]  Mara Cercignani Brain Microstructure By Multi-Modal MRI , 2019, Science Trends.

[2]  D. Siljak Stability and sensitivity , 1968 .

[3]  Alan Connelly,et al.  SIFT: Spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms , 2013, NeuroImage.

[4]  Mark E Bastin,et al.  Sex Differences in the Adult Human Brain: Evidence from 5216 UK Biobank Participants , 2017, bioRxiv.

[5]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. , 2009, Genome research.

[6]  Andrew Zalesky,et al.  Building connectomes using diffusion MRI: why, how and but , 2017, NMR in biomedicine.

[7]  Mara Cercignani,et al.  Brain microstructure by multi-modal MRI: Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts? , 2017, NeuroImage.

[8]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Sequence-independent segmentation of magnetic resonance images , 2004, NeuroImage.

[9]  Mark E. Bastin,et al.  Test–retest reliability of structural brain networks from diffusion MRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[10]  S. Mori,et al.  White matter atlases based on diffusion tensor imaging , 2009, Current opinion in neurology.

[11]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Shouliang Qi,et al.  The influence of construction methodology on structural brain network measures: A review , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  Vijay K. Venkatraman,et al.  Plasma ceramides predict age-related differences in white matter microstructure , 2015, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[14]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Comparing Brain Networks of Different Size and Connectivity Density Using Graph Theory , 2010, PloS one.

[15]  S. Pizer,et al.  Measuring tortuosity of the intracerebral vasculature from MRA images , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Joanna M. Wardlaw,et al.  Quantifying the effects of normal ageing on white matter structure using unsupervised tract shape modelling , 2010, NeuroImage.

[17]  M. Filippi,et al.  Intrahemispheric and interhemispheric structural network abnormalities in PLS and ALS , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[18]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[19]  Hauke R. Heekeren,et al.  Age-related differences in white matter microstructure: Region-specific patterns of diffusivity , 2010, NeuroImage.

[20]  C. Sudlow,et al.  Comparison of Sociodemographic and Health-Related Characteristics of UK Biobank Participants With Those of the General Population , 2017, American journal of epidemiology.

[21]  Ludovica Griffanti,et al.  Image processing and Quality Control for the first 10,000 brain imaging datasets from UK Biobank , 2017, NeuroImage.

[22]  M. P. van den Heuvel,et al.  Impaired Structural Motor Connectome in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , 2011, PloS one.

[23]  Alan Connelly,et al.  MRtrix: Diffusion tractography in crossing fiber regions , 2012, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[24]  M S Gazzaniga,et al.  Cortical and subcortical interhemispheric interactions following partial and complete callosotomy. , 2000, Archives of neurology.

[25]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex , 2016, Nature.

[26]  Aldo Quattrone,et al.  Structural connectivity differences in motor network between tremor‐dominant and nontremor Parkinson's disease , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[27]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Age- and Gender-Related Differences in the Cortical Anatomical Network , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  O. Sporns,et al.  Structural and Functional Aspects Relating to Cost and Benefit of Rich Club Organization in the Human Cerebral Cortex , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Adeel Razi,et al.  Stability and sensitivity of structural connectomes: effect of thresholding and filtering and demonstration in neurodegeneration , 2018, bioRxiv.

[30]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[31]  Mojtaba Zarei,et al.  White matter tract integrity in aging and Alzheimer's disease , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[32]  Yong He,et al.  Diffusion Tensor Tractography Reveals Abnormal Topological Organization in Structural Cortical Networks in Alzheimer's Disease , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion‐weighted MR imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Identifying population differences in whole-brain structural networks: A machine learning approach , 2010, NeuroImage.

[35]  Jason S. Nomi,et al.  Structural Connections of Functionally Defined Human Insular Subdivisions , 2018, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  Markus H. Sneve,et al.  Brain Events Underlying Episodic Memory Changes in Aging: A Longitudinal Investigation of Structural and Functional Connectivity. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  Alan Connelly,et al.  SIFT2: Enabling dense quantitative assessment of brain white matter connectivity using streamlines tractography , 2015, NeuroImage.

[38]  Kotagiri Ramamohanarao,et al.  Mapping connectomes with diffusion MRI: deterministic or probabilistic tractography? , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[39]  John D. Van Horn,et al.  Circular representation of human cortical networks for subject and population-level connectomic visualization , 2012, NeuroImage.

[40]  Lianne H. Scholtens,et al.  Topological organization of connectivity strength in the rat connectome , 2015, Brain Structure and Function.

[41]  M. P. van den Heuvel,et al.  Estimating false positives and negatives in brain networks. , 2013, NeuroImage.

[42]  G Cioni,et al.  Network over‐connectivity differentiates autism spectrum disorder from other developmental disorders in toddlers: A diffusion MRI study , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[43]  Timothy D. Verstynen,et al.  Population-averaged atlas of the macroscale human structural connectome and its network topology , 2018, NeuroImage.

[44]  Daniel C. Alexander,et al.  NODDI: Practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain , 2012, NeuroImage.

[45]  Peter F. Neher,et al.  The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography , 2017, Nature Communications.

[46]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[48]  Mark E Bastin,et al.  Ageing and brain white matter structure in 3,513 UK Biobank participants , 2016, Nature Communications.

[49]  David H. Salat,et al.  The Declining Infrastructure of the Aging Brain , 2011, Brain Connect..

[50]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Analysis of connectivity in the cat cerebral cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[51]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  Consistency-based thresholding of the human connectome , 2017, NeuroImage.

[52]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Age‐related changes in the topological organization of the white matter structural connectome across the human lifespan , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[53]  M. Jenkinson Non-linear registration aka Spatial normalisation , 2007 .

[54]  O. Sporns,et al.  Rich-Club Organization of the Human Connectome , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  Andrew Zalesky,et al.  A DTI-Derived Measure of Cortico-Cortical Connectivity , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[56]  Lauren L. Cloutman,et al.  The structural connectivity of higher order association cortices reflects human functional brain networks , 2017, Cortex.

[57]  J. Haxby,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[58]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[59]  M. Bellgrove,et al.  Altered structural connectivity in ADHD: a network based analysis , 2016, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[60]  P. Matthews,et al.  Multimodal population brain imaging in the UK Biobank prospective epidemiological study , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[61]  E. J. Williams The Comparison of Regression Variables , 1959 .

[62]  Martijn P. van den Heuvel,et al.  Estimating false positives and negatives in brain networks , 2013, NeuroImage.

[63]  Chun-Hung Yeh,et al.  Is removal of weak connections necessary for graph-theoretical analysis of dense weighted structural connectomes from diffusion MRI? , 2019, NeuroImage.

[64]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Overcoming the effects of false positives and threshold bias in graph theoretical analyses of neuroimaging data , 2015, NeuroImage.

[65]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[66]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Improving the Reliability of Network Metrics in Structural Brain Networks by Integrating Different Network Weighting Strategies into a Single Graph , 2017, Front. Neurosci..

[67]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[68]  Allan R. Jones,et al.  A mesoscale connectome of the mouse brain , 2014, Nature.

[69]  P. Thiran,et al.  Mapping Human Whole-Brain Structural Networks with Diffusion MRI , 2007, PloS one.

[70]  Claus C. Hilgetag,et al.  Principles of ipsilateral and contralateral cortico-cortical connectivity in the mouse , 2015, Brain Structure and Function.

[71]  Manuel Blesa Cabez,et al.  Polygenic risk score for schizophrenia and structural brain connectivity in older age: A longitudinal connectome and tractography study , 2018, NeuroImage.

[72]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Distance-dependent consensus thresholds for generating group-representative structural brain networks , 2019, Network Neuroscience.

[73]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  Tractography: Where Do We Go from Here? , 2011, Brain Connect..

[74]  D. Leopold,et al.  Anatomical accuracy of brain connections derived from diffusion MRI tractography is inherently limited , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[75]  Nikola T. Markov,et al.  A Weighted and Directed Interareal Connectivity Matrix for Macaque Cerebral Cortex , 2012, Cerebral cortex.