The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction

Conceptual conflict has long been recognized as a factor that could facilitate student learning. Due, however, to the lack of a convincing explanation of why it occurs, and how it can be resolved, it has seldom been used in instructional design. Its potential use in instruction is particularly relevant in the light of the recent, well-documented finding that students' existing conceptions frequently constitute a barrier to effective learning. This article examines conceptual conflict in the light of an epistemological model of learning as conceptual change. This analysis shows that the conceptual change model provides an explanation of conceptual conflict which is sufficiently detailed to allow it to be used in the design of instruction. The results of two studies, the first of which addressed the concepts of mass, volume, and density, and the second, the concept of speed, show that instruction, designed in this way, is effective in changing students' existing conceptions.

[1]  Jean Piaget,et al.  Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning , 1964 .

[2]  J. Dewey,et al.  How We Think , 2009 .

[3]  H Helm,et al.  Misconceptions in physics amongst South African students , 1980 .

[4]  L. McDermott,et al.  Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension , 1980 .

[5]  Barry J. Zimmerman,et al.  Toward an empirical test of the role of cognitive conflict in learning , 1983 .

[6]  Equilibration as cognitive conflict , 1983 .

[7]  S. Toulmin.  The collective use and evolution of concepts , 1972 .

[8]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[9]  Conflict, learning, and Piaget: Comments on Zimmerman and Blom's “Toward an empirical test of the role of cognitive conflict in learning” , 1983 .

[10]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  Five generalizations about cognitive development. , 1983 .

[11]  Peter W. Hewson,et al.  A Conceptual Change Approach to Learning Science , 1981 .

[12]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[13]  R. Osborne,et al.  Learning science: A generative process , 1983 .

[14]  Stephen Toulmin,et al.  Human Understanding, Volume I: The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts , 1977 .

[15]  J. Nussbaum,et al.  Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy , 1982 .

[16]  R. Driver,et al.  Theories-in-Action: Some Theoretical and Empirical Issues in the Study of Students' Conceptual Frameworks in Science , 1983 .

[17]  T. Kuhn.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[18]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[19]  L. Viennot.  Spontaneous Reasoning in Elementary Dynamics. , 1979 .

[20]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Child's Conception of the World , 1971 .

[21]  L. E. Klopfer,et al.  Cognitive research and the design of science instruction , 1982 .

[22]  L. Resnick,et al.  Mathematics and Science Learning: A New Conception , 1983, Science.