Are assessments responding to a dynamic environment? Evidence from four emerging techno-scientific domains

Assessments of emerging science and technologies can assist actors to anticipate and influence techno-scientific development. Although the importance of contextual factors in techno-scientific development has been stressed, the extent to which economic, societal and political trends are integrated into assessment practices is unknown. Focusing on a number of such trends, this paper shows that there are clear differences in how trends are being addressed in different techno-scientific domains. Maturity, developmental speed and societal awareness of techno-scientific domains, as well as associated impacts thereof, seem to influence the consideration of trends in assessments. Furthermore, both the extent and quality of trend reflection seem to be related to the methodological approaches applied in conducting assessments, including the use of participatory approaches, temporal orientations and the transparency of assessment processes in general.

[1]  Brij Mohan Gupta,et al.  A Bibliometric Approach towards Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology , 2004 .

[2]  Ann M. Hess,et al.  Linear trend analysis: a comparison of methods , 2001 .

[3]  R. Slaughter.  Looking for the real ‘megatrends’ , 1993 .

[4]  Stewart Barr,et al.  Strategies for sustainability: citizens and responsible environmental behaviour , 2003 .

[5]  Frank Vanclay,et al.  International Principles For Social Impact Assessment , 2003 .

[6]  Dan van der Horst,et al.  Spatial scale and social impacts of biofuel production , 2011 .

[7]  Derek Barker,et al.  Technology foresight using roadmaps , 1995 .

[8]  E. Heiskanen,et al.  User involvement in radical innovation: are consumers conservative? , 2007 .

[9]  Yongtae Park,et al.  Development of New Technology Forecasting Algorithm: Hybrid Approach for Morphology Analysis and Conjoint Analysis of Patent Information , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[10]  Steven G. Paulsen,et al.  MONITORING FOR POLICY-RELEVANT REGIONALTRENDS OVER TIME , 1998 .

[11]  Patricia Arnold,et al.  Adding connectivity and losing context with ICT: contrasting learning situations from a community of practice perspective , 2003 .

[12]  Peter Dabrock,et al.  Playing God? Synthetic biology as a theological and ethical challenge , 2009, Systems and Synthetic Biology.

[13]  H. An,et al.  Measuring consumer resistance to a new food technology: A choice experiment in meat packaging , 2013 .

[14]  Robert Bailis,et al.  Constructing Sustainable Biofuels: Governance of the Emerging Biofuel Economy , 2011 .

[15]  Hsin-Ning Su,et al.  A systematic approach for integrated trend analysis—The case of etching , 2011 .

[16]  Colin J. Bennett.  Computers, Personal Data, and Theories of Technology: Comparative Approaches to Privacy Protection in the 1990s , 1991 .

[17]  A. Rip,et al.  The past and future of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[18]  Yen-Chu Weng.  Spatiotemporal changes of landscape pattern in response to urbanization , 2007 .

[19]  Edward A. Parson,et al.  Integrated assessment and environmental policy making: In pursuit of usefulness , 1995 .

[20]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[21]  Sungjoon Lee,et al.  ICT Co-evolution and Korean ICT strategy-An analysis based on patent data , 2009 .

[22]  S. Cunningham,et al.  Technology futures analysis: Toward integration of the field and new methods , 2004 .

[23]  L. Krabbenborg.  The potential of national public engagement exercises: Evaluating the case of the recent Dutch Societal Dialogue on Nanotechnology , 2012 .

[24]  R. V. Schomberg.  A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2013 .

[25]  David H. Guston,et al.  Real-time technology assessment , 2020, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[26]  Drew Endy,et al.  Synthetic genomics | options for governance. , 2007, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[27]  Sylvia R. Esterby.  Trend analysis methods for environmental data , 1993 .

[28]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Consumer Resistance to, and Acceptance Of, Innovations , 1999 .

[29]  Juan Gorraiz,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of pharmacology and pharmacy journals: Scopus versus Web of Science , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[30]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Using Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis to Leverage Social Indicator Databases: The Discovery of Interesting Patterns , 2007 .

[31]  J. Bureau,et al.  European Biofuel Policy: How Far Will Public Support Go? , 2010 .

[32]  Claudia R. Binder,et al.  Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture , 2010 .

[33]  Saji S. Nair,et al.  A Brief Overview of Metadata Formats , 2004 .

[34]  H. Komiyama.  Beyond the Limits to Growth: New Ideas for Sustainability from Japan , 2014 .

[35]  Yongtae Park,et al.  Trajectory patterns of technology fusion: Trend analysis and taxonomical grouping in nanobiotechnology , 2010 .

[36]  G. Walt,et al.  Global public-private partnerships: Part I--A new development in health? , 2000, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[37]  K. Raja Gopal,et al.  A review on biodiesel production, combustion, emissions and performance , 2009 .

[38]  P. Mclaren,et al.  Deriving transport pathways in a sediment trend analysis (STA) , 2007 .

[39]  E. Schmid,et al.  Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets , 2011 .

[40]  Richard K. Morgan.  Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art , 2012 .

[41]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  A normative-functional concept of sustainability and its indicators , 2009 .

[42]  I. Dincer.  Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review , 2000 .

[43]  van Qc Rinie Est,et al.  The Practice of TA; Science, Interaction, and Communication , 2004 .

[44]  Torsten Fleischer,et al.  Assessing emerging technologies—Methodological challenges and the case of nanotechnologies , 2005 .

[45]  Julian Blagg,et al.  A public-private partnership to unlock the untargeted kinome. , 2013, Nature chemical biology.

[46]  Culturally-Based Framing Factors that Influence Technology Assessment , 2004 .

[47]  Rüdiger Hahn.  Integrating Corporate Responsibility and Sustainable Development - A Normative-Conceptual Approach to Holistic Management Thinking , 2011 .

[48]  C. Greve,et al.  Public-Private Partnerships: An International Performance Review , 2007 .

[49]  J. Weston.  EIA THEORIES — ALL CHINESE WHISPERS AND NO CRITICAL THEORY , 2010 .

[50]  Jenny Pope,et al.  The state of the art of impact assessment in 2012 , 2012 .

[51]  Omer Rana,et al.  Simultaneous trend analysis for evaluating outcomes in patient-centred health monitoring services , 2008, Health care management science.

[52]  Justin W. Patchin,et al.  Trends in online social networking: adolescent use of MySpace over time , 2010, New Media Soc..