Ultimate and fatigue load mitigation by an inertial-driven passive flap, using a geometrically exact multibody formulation

Abstract The paper characterizes the performance of a passive flap concept when applied to a modern very large conceptual wind turbine. The passive flap responds automatically to blade and/or tower vibrations, inducing a change of camber that opposes dynamic loads on the wind turbine. This is obtained in a purely passive manner, without the need for actuators or sensors. The present study is based on a detailed, geometrically exact multibody formulation of the device, which is able to capture all kinematic and structural dynamic effects of this inertia-driven device. The present modeling of the passive device improves on previous studies conducted with simplified models. Results show a significant ability in the reduction of both fatigue and ultimate loads, including the case of flap-specific fault scenarios. Solutions for limiting losses in energy yield caused by non-null average flap rotations in the partial load region are also investigated. The present analysis motivates further studies aimed at reaping the benefits of load alleviation enabled by the passive flap, for example by designing a new enlarged rotor at similar key loads on the rest of the machine.

[1]  Configuration and Numerical Investigation of the Adaptive Camber Airfoil as Passive Load Alleviation Mechanism for Wind Turbines , 2015 .

[2]  Niels Kjølstad Poulsen,et al.  A smart rotor configuration with linear quadratic control of adaptive trailing edge flaps for active load alleviation , 2015 .

[3]  David A. Peters,et al.  Finite state induced flow models. II - Three-dimensional rotor disk , 1995 .

[4]  W. H. Wentz,et al.  Feasibility study of aileron and spoiler control systems for large horizontal axis wind turbines , 1980 .

[5]  Martin Otto Laver Hansen,et al.  Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines , 2001 .

[6]  Carlo L. Bottasso,et al.  Inertial and Aerodynamic Tuning of Passive Devices for Load Alleviation on Wind Turbines , 2016 .

[7]  C. Bottasso,et al.  Integration of multiple passive load mitigation technologies by automated design optimization-The case study of a medium-size onshore wind turbine , 2018, Wind Energy.

[8]  Olivier A. Bauchau,et al.  Modeling rotorcraft dynamics with finite element multibody procedures , 2001 .

[9]  Olivier A. Bauchau,et al.  Robust integration schemes for flexible multibody systems , 2003 .

[10]  Carlo L. Bottasso,et al.  Power curve tracking in the presence of a tip speed constraint , 2012 .

[11]  Olivier A. Bauchau,et al.  Scaling of Constraints and Augmented Lagrangian Formulations in Multibody Dynamics Simulations , 2009 .

[12]  Roeland De Breuker,et al.  Fatigue and extreme load reduction of wind turbine components using smart rotors , 2016 .

[13]  Carlo L. Bottasso,et al.  Articulated blade tip devices for load alleviation on wind turbines , 2016 .

[14]  Christian Bak,et al.  Deformable trailing edge flaps for modern megawatt wind turbine controllers using strain gauge sensors , 2010 .

[15]  Olivier A. Bauchau,et al.  Modeling of unilateral contact conditions with application to aerospace systems involving backlash, freeplay and friction , 2001 .

[16]  B. Jonkman,et al.  TurbSim User's Guide , 2005 .

[17]  Carlo L. Bottasso,et al.  Load mitigation for wind turbines by a passive aeroelastic device , 2016 .

[18]  Carlo L. Bottasso,et al.  Multi-layer control architecture for the reduction of deterministic and non-deterministic loads on wind turbines , 2013 .

[19]  R. H. Stroub.  An analytical investigation of the free-tip rotor for helicopters , 1982 .

[20]  Raymond Chow,et al.  Computational Investigations of Deploying Load Control Microtabs on a Wind Turbine Airfoil , 2007 .

[21]  Theodore Theodorsen,et al.  Nonstationary flow about a wing-aileron-tab combination including aerodynamic balance , 1942 .