Dynamic 18F‐FDG PET/CT can predict the major pathological response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in non‐small cell lung cancer

Major pathological response (MPR) is a potential surrogate for overall survival. We determined whether the dynamic changes in 18F‐labeled fluoro‐2‐deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F‐FDG PET/CT) were associated with MPR in patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Forty‐four patients with stage II–III non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and radical surgery were enrolled. Moreover, 18F‐FDG PET/CT scans were performed at baseline and within 1 week before surgery to evaluate the disease. All histological sections were reviewed to assess MPR. The detailed clinical features of the patients were analyzed. The reliability of the clinical variables was assessed in differentiating between MPR and non‐MPR using logistic regression. Receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified the SUVmax changes threshold most associated with MPR. Most of the patients were pathologically diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma and received anti‐PD‐1 antibodies plus chemotherapy. The immunotherapy regimens included nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and camrelizumab. MPR was observed in more than half of lesions. Tumors with MPR had a higher decrease in the longest dimension on dynamic PET/CT than those without MPR. Furthermore, the decline in SUVmax was significantly different between MPR and non‐MPR diseases, and MPR lesions had a prominent mean reduction in SUVmax. SUVmax reduction was independently associated with MPR in the multivariate regression. On ROC analysis, the threshold of SUVmax decrease in 60% was associated with MPR. Dynamic changes in SUVmax were associated with MPR. The tumors with MPR showed a greater PET/CT response than those without MPR. A SUVmax decrease of more than 60% is more likely to result in an MPR after receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

[1]  N. Girard,et al.  Neoadjuvant Nivolumab plus Chemotherapy in Resectable Lung Cancer. , 2022, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Y. Wu,et al.  98P Camrelizumab as neoadjuvant, first- or later-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A retrospective real-world study (CTONG2004) , 2021, Annals of Oncology.

[3]  M. Perelman,et al.  OA11.01 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab for Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2021, Journal of Thoracic Oncology.

[4]  S. Broderick,et al.  Abstract CT003: Nivolumab (NIVO) + platinum-doublet chemotherapy (chemo) vs chemo as neoadjuvant treatment (tx) for resectable (IB-IIIA) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the phase 3 CheckMate 816 trial , 2021, Clinical Trials.

[5]  Chao Zhang,et al.  Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non–small cell lung cancer: State of the art , 2021, Cancer communications.

[6]  M. Kris,et al.  PS01.05 Surgical and Clinical Outcomes With Neoadjuvant Atezolizumab in Resectable Stage IB–IIIB NSCLC: LCMC3 Trial Primary Analysis , 2021 .

[7]  N. Ajami,et al.  Neoadjuvant nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in operable non-small cell lung cancer: the phase 2 randomized NEOSTAR trial , 2021, Nature Medicine.

[8]  M. Lanuti,et al.  Neoadjuvant atezolizumab and chemotherapy in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. , 2020, The Lancet. Oncology.

[9]  Ning Li,et al.  The efficiency of 18F-FDG PET-CT for predicting the major pathologic response to the neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in resectable non-small cell lung cancer , 2020, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[10]  Prasad Adusumilli,et al.  IASLC MULTIDISCIPLINARY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PATHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF LUNG CANCER RESECTION SPECIMENS FOLLOWING NEOADJUVANT THERAPY. , 2020, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[11]  S. Fanti,et al.  FDG PET/CT for assessing tumour response to immunotherapy: Report on the EANM symposium on immune modulation and recent review of the literature , 2020 .

[12]  S. Rossi,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT in Restaging and Evaluation of Response to Therapy in Lung Cancer: State of the Art , 2019, Current radiopharmaceuticals.

[13]  M. Kris,et al.  OA13.07 Neoadjuvant Atezolizumab in Resectable NSCLC Patients: Immunophenotyping Results from the Interim Analysis of the Multicenter Trial LCMC3 , 2019, Journal of Thoracic Oncology.

[14]  Ying Cheng,et al.  Erlotinib Versus Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stage IIIA-N2 EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (EMERGING-CTONG 1103): A Randomized Phase II Study. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  Yi-long Wu,et al.  Neoadjuvant Crizotinib in Resectable Locally Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer with ALK Rearrangement , 2019, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[16]  S. Fanti,et al.  FDG PET/CT for assessing tumour response to immunotherapy , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[17]  Stephen Broderick,et al.  Neoadjuvant PD‐1 Blockade in Resectable Lung Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  S. Baba,et al.  Metabolic characteristics of programmed cell death‐ligand 1‐expressing lung cancer on 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography , 2017, Cancer medicine.

[19]  P. Allavena,et al.  Correlation of metabolic information on FDG-PET with tissue expression of immune markers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are candidates for upfront surgery , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  Sarah Burdett,et al.  Preoperative chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data , 2014, The Lancet.

[21]  Edward S. Kim,et al.  Computed Tomography RECIST Assessment of Histopathologic Response and Prediction of Survival in Patients with Resectable Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2013, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[22]  J. Goo,et al.  Value of Combined Interpretation of Computed Tomography Response and Positron Emission Tomography Response for Prediction of Prognosis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer , 2010, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[23]  Richard J Stephens,et al.  Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: a pooled analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  T. Gauler,et al.  Correlation of PET/CT Findings and Histopathology after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2008, Oncology.

[25]  Bengt Bergman,et al.  Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.