Brightness contrast from inhomogeneous surrounds

The luminance of a test within an inhomogeneous ("checkerboard") surround was adjusted to match the brightness of a comparison patch within a uniform surround. All stimuli were achromatic. Both surrounds had the same space-averaged luminance. With an incremental comparison patch, a test-within-checkerboard at a luminance between the luminances of the brighter and dimmer checks appears dimmer than if viewed within the uniform surround. A decremental comparison patch, however, is matched by a test luminance that is little affected by the inhomogeneity of the surround. In general, the brightness of the test is mediated neither by the space-averaged luminance of an inhomogeneous surround, nor by any equivalent uniform surround, regardless of luminance. We consider alternative models for the brightness of a region that is neither strictly an increment nor decrement with respect to contiguous surrounding surfaces.

[1]  M. McCourt.  A spatial frequency dependent grating-induction effect , 1982, Vision Research.

[2]  P. Whittle.  Increments and decrements: Luminance discrimination , 1986, Vision Research.

[3]  C. Semmelroth,et al.  Adjustment of the munsell-value and w*-scales to uniform lightness steps for various background reflectances. , 1971, Applied optics.

[4]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  V Zemon,et al.  A comparison of Fourier analysis and feature analysis in pattern-specific color aftereffects. , 1976, Science.

[6]  A. L. Diamond,et al.  Foveal simultaneous brightness contrast as a function of inducing-and test-field luminances. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  E. Q. Adams,et al.  The effect on foveal vision of bright (and dark) surroundings. V , 1922 .

[9]  Johann Pfanzag.  A general theory of measurement applications to utility , 1959 .

[10]  R. F. Fagot,et al.  Test of a response bias model of bisection , 1970 .

[11]  Q. Zaidi.  Apparent brightness in complex displays: A reply to moulden and kingdom , 1990, Vision Research.

[12]  P. Whittle.  Brightness, discriminability and the “Crispening Effect” , 1992, Vision Research.

[13]  H Takasaki,et al.  Lightness change of grays induced by change in reflectance of gray background. , 1966, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[14]  H. Wilson,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking , 1983, Vision Research.

[15]  S S Stevens,et al.  To Honor Fechner and Repeal His Law: A power function, not a log function, describes the operating characteristic of a sensory system. , 1961, Science.

[16]  C. Semmelroth,et al.  Prediction of lightness and brightness on different backgrounds. , 1970, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[17]  A. Gilchrist,et al.  Hess and Pretori revisited: Resolution of some old contradictions , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Alan Jacobsen,et al.  Qualitative relationships are decisive , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  O. Bryngdahl,et al.  Characteristics of the visual system. Psychophysical measurements of the response to spatial sine-wave stimuli in the photopic region. , 1966, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[20]  J. Cronly-Dillon,et al.  Vision and visual dysfunction. , 1994, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[21]  M. Alpern,et al.  The effect of a peripheral glare source upon the apparent brightness of an object. , 1953, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[22]  Invariance tests for bisection and fractionation scaling , 1967 .

[23]  H. Wallach.  Brightness constancy and the nature of achromatic colors. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  R. M. Springer.  Suprathreshold information transfer in the visual system: Brightness match profiles of high contrast gratings , 1978, Vision Research.

[25]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[26]  P. Eskildsen,et al.  Effect of rate of change in physical intensity on bisection and fractionation judgments of brightness. , 1966 .

[27]  L. E. Arend,et al.  Difference information in brightness perception , 1971 .

[28]  H. K. Hartline,et al.  INHIBITORY INTERACTION OF RECEPTOR UNITS IN THE EYE OF LIMULUS , 1957, The Journal of general physiology.

[29]  K. Alexander,et al.  The effect of contrast polarity on letter identification , 1993, Vision Research.

[30]  E. G. Heinemann.  Brightness contrast, brightness constancy, and the ratio principle , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  H. Horeman.  Inductive brightness depression as influenced by configurational conditions , 1963 .

[32]  H. M. Johnson.  Did Fechner measure "introspectional" sensations? , 1929 .

[33]  E. G. Heinemann,et al.  Simultaneous brightness induction as a function of inducing and test-field luminances. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  A. Lit,et al.  Reaction time to incremental and decremental target luminance changes at various photopic background levels , 1975, Vision Research.

[35]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Visual grating induction. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[36]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Stimulus specificity in the human visual system. , 1973, Vision research.

[37]  Mathew Alpern,et al.  The Additivity of Contrast in the Human Eye , 1959, The Journal of general physiology.

[38]  F. Gage.  An Experimental Investigation of the Measurability of Auditory Sensation , 1934 .

[39]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Light and dark bars; contrast discrimination , 1983, Vision Research.

[40]  James T. Walker,et al.  Brightness enhancement and the Talbot level in stationary gratings , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  E. G. Heinemann,et al.  The relation of apparent brightness to the theshold for differences in luminance. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[42]  Edward Bradford Titchener,et al.  Experimental psychology: A manual of laboratory practice, Vol 1: Qualitative experiments: Part II. Instructor's manual. , 1901 .

[43]  J A Solomon,et al.  Texture interactions determine perceived contrast , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  H. Helson,et al.  A reformulation of the Fechner law in terms of adaptation-level applied to rating scale data. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[45]  L. Arend,et al.  Simultaneous constancy, lightness, and brightness. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[46]  D. H. Kelly.  Pattern detection and the two-dimensional Fourier transform: Flickering checkerboards and chromatic mechanisms , 1976, Vision Research.

[47]  I. H. Godlove,et al.  Neutral Value Scales. I. Munsell Neutral Value1 Scale , 1933 .

[48]  J Gottesman,et al.  Symmetry and constancy in the perception of negative and positive luminance contrast. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[49]  D. G. Green,et al.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[50]  J. Kulikowski,et al.  Effective contrast constancy and linearity of contrast sensation , 1976, Vision Research.