Les réseaux d'engagements comme méthode pour modéliser le comportement dialogique des agents

In this article, we present the web of commitment methodology that allows us to specify the dialogical behavior of agents from the commitments that can be contracted between them and from the links that can exist between those commitments. At first, we present the DIAGAL agent communication language which is based on social commitments and dialogue games that are defined as structures regulating the mechanism under which some commitments are discussed through the dialogue. Then, we present our social commitments model to explain how the agent who uses DIAGAL can use the dialogue games to manipulate the commitments. For that, we introduce the web of commitments concept which makes it possible to specify the causality links that exist between various commitments of a multi-agent system. Finally, we explain using an illustrative example how we could implement, through our simulator, our concepts and ideas. MOTS-CLES : langages de communication agent, protocoles d’interaction, dialogue, modelisation.

[1]  Munindar P. Singh Agent Communication Languages: Rethinking the Principles , 2003, Communication in Multiagent Systems.

[2]  Marc-Philippe Huget,et al.  Modularity in Interaction Protocols , 2003, Workshop on Agent Communication Languages.

[3]  Munindar P. Singh A Social Semantics for Agent Communication Languages , 2000, Issues in Agent Communication.

[4]  Marco Colombetti,et al.  Defining interaction protocols using a commitment-based agent communication language , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[5]  Brahim Chaib-draa,et al.  DIAGAL: A Tool for Analyzing and Modelling Commitment-Based Dialogues between Agents , 2003, Canadian Conference on AI.

[6]  Nicolas Maudet Modéliser les conventions des interactions langagières : la contribution des jeux de dialogue , 2001 .

[7]  Marie-Laure Potet Spécifications et développements structurés dans la méthode B , 2003, Tech. Sci. Informatiques.

[8]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  Commitment Machines , 2001, ATAL.

[9]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Issues in Agent Communication , 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[10]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Issues in Agent Communication: An Introduction , 2000, Issues in Agent Communication.

[11]  Jean-Paul Sansonnet,et al.  Agents informationnels pour l'étude expérimentale de concepts de socio-cognition Vers une approche agent de la socio-informatique , 2003, Tech. Sci. Informatiques.

[12]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Desiderata for agent argumentation protocols , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[13]  Feng Wan,et al.  Commitments and causality for multiagent design , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[14]  Brahim Chaib-draa,et al.  Request for Action Reconsidered as a Dialogue Game Based on Commitments , 2003, Communication in Multiagent Systems.