Consumer responses to integrated risk-benefit information associated with the consumption of food.

The risk analysis of the health impact of foods is increasingly focused on integrated risk-benefit assessment, which will also need to be communicated to consumers. It therefore becomes important to understand how consumers respond to integrated risk-benefit information. Quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs) is one measure that can be used to assess the balance between risks and benefits associated with a particular food. The effectiveness of QALYs for communicating both positive and negative health effects associated with food consumption to consumers was examined, using a 3 × 2 experiment varying information about health changes in terms of QALYs associated with the consumption of fish (n = 325). The effect of this information on consumer perceptions of the usefulness of QALYs for describing health effects, on risk and benefit perceptions, attitudes, and intentions to consume fish was examined. Results demonstrated that consumers perceived QALYs as useful for communicating health effects associated with food consumption. QALYs communicated as a net effect were preferred for food products associated with negative net effects on health, while separate communication of both risks and benefits may be preferred for food products associated with positive or zero net health effects. Information about health changes in terms of QALYs facilitated informed decision making by consumers, as indicated by the impact on risk and benefit perceptions as intended by the information. The impact of this information on actual food consumption choices merits further investigation.

[1]  Edward B. Royzman,et al.  Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion , 2001 .

[2]  Gene Rowe,et al.  The views of key stakeholders on an evolving food risk governance framework: Results from a Delphi study , 2009 .

[3]  Jean-Charles Leblanc,et al.  A Risk‐Benefit Analysis of French High Fish Consumption: A QALY Approach , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  Guilbert Jj The world health report 2002 - reducing risks, promoting healthy life. , 2003 .

[5]  I. Ajzen Nature and operation of attitudes. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Communicating Risks and Benefits from Fish Consumption: Impact on Belgian Consumers' Perception and Intention to Eat Fish , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[8]  Joshua T. Cohen,et al.  A quantitative risk-benefit analysis of changes in population fish consumption. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[9]  Erik Millstone,et al.  The Evolution of Food Safety Policy–making Institutions in the UK, EU and Codex Alimentarius , 2002 .

[10]  A. Flynn,et al.  Risk-benefit analysis of micronutrients. , 2004, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[11]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[12]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Individual determinants of fish consumption: application of the theory of planned behaviour , 2005, Appetite.

[13]  Sir,et al.  Our food, our health - Healthy diet and safe food in the Netherlands , 2006 .

[14]  Dariush Mozaffarian,et al.  Fish intake, contaminants, and human health: evaluating the risks and the benefits. , 2006, JAMA.

[15]  Jacqueline Patterson,et al.  Weighing Health Benefit and Health Risk Information when Consuming Sport‐Caught Fish , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  E M Faustman,et al.  Comparative Risk and Policy Analysis in Environmental Health , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  E M Faustman,et al.  Use of Quality‐Adjusted Life Year Weights with Dose‐Response Models for Public Health Decisions: A Case Study of the Risks and Benefits of Fish Consumption , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  P. Darnerud,et al.  A Risk-Benefit Analysis Based on the Occurrence of Dioxin/PCB, Methyl Mercury, n-3 Fatty Acids and Vitamin D in Fish , 2007 .

[19]  R. Nayga Impact of Sociodemographic Factors on Perceived Importance of Nutrition in Food Shopping. , 1997 .

[20]  Joanna Burger,et al.  A framework and information needs for the management of the risks from consumption of self-caught fish. , 2006, Environmental research.

[21]  J. Wardle,et al.  Development of a Measure of the Motives Underlying the Selection of Food: the Food Choice Questionnaire , 1995, Appetite.

[22]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Consumer perception versus scientific evidence about health benefits and safety risks from fish consumption , 2005, Public Health Nutrition.

[23]  E. H. Zandstra,et al.  Differences in health and taste attitudes and reported behaviour among Finnish, Dutch and British consumers: a cross-national validation of the Health and Taste Attitude Scales (HTAS) , 2001, Appetite.

[24]  M. Chinnan,et al.  Consumer concerns about nutritional attributes in a transition economy , 1998 .