Vertical object motion during horizontal ocular pursuit: compensation for eye movements increases with presentation duration

Smooth pursuit eye movements change the retinal image motion of objects in the visual field. To enable an observer to perceive the motion of these objects veridically, the visual system has to compensate for the effects of the eye movements. The occurrence of the Filehne-illusion (illusory motion of a stationary object during smooth pursuit) shows that this compensation is not always perfect. The amplitude of the illusion appears to decrease with increasing presentation durations of the stationary object. In this study we investigated whether presentation duration has the same effect when an observer views a vertically moving object during horizontal pursuit. In this case, the pursuit eye movements cause the perceived motion path to be oblique instead of vertical; this error in perceived motion direction should decrease with higher presentation durations. In Experiment 1, we found that the error in perceived motion direction indeed decreased with increasing presentation duration, especially for higher pursuit velocities. The results of Experiment 2 showed that the error in perceived motion direction did not depend on the moment during pursuit at which the stimulus was presented, suggesting that the degree of compensation for eye movements is constant throughout pursuit. The results suggest that longer presentation durations cause the eye movement signal that is used by the visual system to increase more than the retinal signal.

[1]  Martin S. Banks,et al.  Perceived head-centric speed is affected by both extra-retinal and retinal errors , 1998, Vision Research.

[2]  Stefan Treue,et al.  The effect of transiency on perceived velocity of visual patterns: a case of “temporal capture” , 1993, Vision Research.

[3]  M T Swanston,et al.  The perception of visual motion during movements of the eyes and of the head , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  A. Wertheim,et al.  Retinal and Extraretinal Information in Movement Perception: How to Invert the Filehne Illusion , 1987, Perception.

[5]  L. Matin,et al.  Visual perception of direction when voluntary saccades occur. I. Relation of visual direction of a fixation target extinguished before a saccade to a flash presented during the saccade , 1969 .

[6]  Claude Bonnet,et al.  Movement detection thresholds and stimulus duration , 1972 .

[7]  Alexander H. Wertheim,et al.  Motion perception during selfmotion: The direct versus inferential controversy revisited , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  Stuart Anstis,et al.  The less you see it, the faster it moves: Shortening the “on-time” speeds up apparent motion , 1989, Vision Research.

[9]  E. Holst,et al.  Das Reafferenzprinzip , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[10]  J. Pola,et al.  Visual perception of direction when voluntary saccades occur: II. Relation of visual direction of a fixation target extinguished before a saccade to a subsequent test flash presented before the saccade , 1970 .

[11]  A. Watson,et al.  The optimal motion stimulus , 1995, Vision Research.

[12]  B. Graaf,et al.  The perception of object motion during smooth pursuit eye movements: Adjacency is not a factor contributing to the filehne illusion , 1988, Vision Research.

[13]  D. Algom,et al.  Visual velocity input-output functions: the integration of distance and duration onto subjective velocity. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  M. A. Frens,et al.  Recording eye movements with video-oculography and scleral search coils: a direct comparison of two methods , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[16]  Robert W. Massof,et al.  Nonlinear contribution of eye velocity to motion perception , 2001, Vision Research.

[17]  Ronald M. Hansen,et al.  Spatial localization during pursuit eye movements , 1979, Vision Research.

[18]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Interaction of Retinal Image and Eye Velocity in Motion Perception , 2003, Neuron.

[19]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  Edward Herman,et al.  The loss of position constancy during pursuit eye movements , 1978, Vision Research.

[21]  H. Leibowitz.  The relation between the rate threshold for the perception of movement and luminance for various durations of exposure. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  T. Freeman,et al.  Transducer models of head-centred motion perception , 2001, Vision Research.

[23]  S. Mateeff.  Saccadic eye movements and localization of visual stimuli , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  T. Freeman,et al.  Path perception and Filehne illusion compared: model and data , 1999, Vision Research.

[25]  P. Bruggencate.  Die Naturwissenschaften , 1963, Nature.

[26]  A. Wertheim,et al.  An Acceleration Illusion Caused by Underestimation of Stimulus Velocity during Pursuit Eye Movements: Aubert–Fleischl Revisited , 1990, Perception.

[27]  E Herman,et al.  Position Constancy during Pursuit Eye Movement: An Investigation of the Filehne Illusion , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  T. Freeman,et al.  Head-centred motion perception in the ageing visual system. , 2002, Spatial vision.

[29]  L Schalén,et al.  Quantification of tracking eye movements in normal subjects. , 1980, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[30]  H. B. Barlow,et al.  What does the eye see best? , 1983, Nature.

[31]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Velocity-time reciprocity in the perception of motion: Foveal and peripheral determinations , 1976, Vision Research.

[32]  M. Griffin,et al.  Eye movement, vection, and motion sickness with foveal and peripheral vision. , 2003, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[33]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Foveal and peripheral displacement thresholds as a function of stimulus luminance, line length and duration of movement , 1980, Vision Research.

[34]  M. Sanders.  Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[35]  H Wallach,et al.  A limitation of position constancy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Leon Festinger,et al.  Visual perception during smooth pursuit eye movements , 1976, Vision Research.

[37]  D. Robinson,et al.  The upper limit of human smooth pursuit velocity , 1985, Vision Research.

[38]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Perception of linear horizontal self-motion induced by peripheral vision (linearvection) basic characteristics and visual-vestibular interactions , 1975, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  M. Masson.  Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[40]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Visual-Vestibular Interaction: Effects on Self-Motion Perception and Postural Control , 1978 .

[41]  R. H. Brown,et al.  The lower threshold of visible movement as a function of exposure-time. , 1954, The American journal of psychology.

[42]  E. Holst.  Relations between the central Nervous System and the peripheral organs , 1954 .

[43]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Motion processing in peripheral vision: Reaction time and perceived velocity , 1982, Vision Research.