Effect of denosumab on Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a dose–response study of AMG 162 (Denosumab) in patients with RheumatoId arthritis on methotrexate to Validate inhibitory effect on bone Erosion (DRIVE)—a 12-month, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II

Objectives To evaluate efficacy and safety of three different regimens of denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK) ligand (RANKL), for Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods In this multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase II study, 350 Japanese patients with RA between 6 months and <5 years, stratified by glucocorticoid use and rheumatoid factor status, were randomly assigned to subcutaneous injections of placebo or denosumab 60 mg every 6 months (Q6M), every 3 months (Q3M) or every 2 months (Q2M). All patients basically continued methotrexate treatment and had a supplement of calcium and vitamin D throughout the study. The primary endpoint was change in the modified Sharp erosion score from baseline to 12 months. Results Denosumab significantly inhibited the progression of bone erosion at 12 months compared with the placebo, and the mean changes of the modified Sharp erosion score at 12 months from baseline were 0.99, 0.27 (compared with placebo, p=0.0082), 0.14 (p=0.0036) and 0.09 (p<0.0001) in the placebo, Q6M, Q3M and Q2M, respectively. Secondary endpoint analysis revealed that denosumab also significantly inhibited the increase of the modified total Sharp score compared with the placebo, with no obvious evidence of an effect on joint space narrowing for denosumab. As shown in previous studies, denosumab increased bone mineral density. No apparent difference was observed in the safety profiles of denosumab and placebo. Conclusions Addition of denosumab to methotrexate has potential as a new therapeutic option for patients with RA with risk factors of joint destruction. Trial registration number JapicCTI-101263.

[1]  F. Lafeber,et al.  Associations of CTX-II with biochemical markers of bone turnover raise questions about its tissue origin: new insights from CHECK , 2014, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[2]  F. Lafeber,et al.  Associations of CTX-II with biochemical markers of bone turnover raise questions on its tissue origin: data from CHECK, a cohort study of early osteoarthritis , 2012, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[3]  Toshitaka Nakamura,et al.  Dose–response study of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis , 2012, Osteoporosis International.

[4]  S. Saevarsdottir,et al.  In early rheumatoid arthritis, patients with a good initial response to methotrexate have excellent 2-year clinical outcomes, but radiological progression is not fully prevented: data from the methotrexate responders population in the SWEFOT trial , 2011, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[5]  Maurizio Cutolo,et al.  Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[6]  Claus Christiansen,et al.  Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  P. Kostenuik,et al.  Denosumab, a Fully Human Monoclonal Antibody to RANKL, Inhibits Bone Resorption and Increases BMD in Knock‐In Mice That Express Chimeric (Murine/Human) RANKL , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  Denosumab treatment effects on structural damage, bone mineral density, and bone turnover in rheumatoid arthritis: a twelve-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II clinical trial. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  Y. Yazici,et al.  Denosumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  J. Zwerina,et al.  Mechanisms of Disease: the link between RANKL and arthritic bone disease , 2005, Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology.

[11]  A. Chott,et al.  Interaction between Synovial Inflammatory Tissue and Bone Marrow in Rheumatoid Arthritis 1 , 2005, The Journal of Immunology.

[12]  B. Bolon,et al.  Kinetics of bone protection by recombinant osteoprotegerin therapy in Lewis rats with adjuvant arthritis. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[13]  D L Lacey,et al.  Osteoprotegerin ligand modulates murine osteoclast survival in vitro and in vivo. , 2000, The American journal of pathology.

[14]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  Long-term course and outcome of functional capacity in rheumatoid arthritis: the effect of disease activity and radiologic damage over time. , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[15]  P. Shekelle,et al.  How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. , 1999 .

[16]  Yongwon Choi,et al.  TRANCE Is Necessary and Sufficient for Osteoblast-mediated Activation of Bone Resorption in Osteoclasts , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[17]  D. Lacey,et al.  Osteoprotegerin Ligand Is a Cytokine that Regulates Osteoclast Differentiation and Activation , 1998, Cell.

[18]  K Yano,et al.  Osteoclast differentiation factor is a ligand for osteoprotegerin/osteoclastogenesis-inhibitory factor and is identical to TRANCE/RANKL. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  B. Bresnihan,et al.  Clinical improvement and radiological deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence that the pathogenesis of synovial inflammation and articular erosion may differ. , 1996, British journal of rheumatology.

[20]  J J Anderson,et al.  American College of Rheumatology. Preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[21]  R. Chang,et al.  The American College of Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1992, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[22]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[23]  Williams Da,et al.  A note on Shirley's nonparametric test for comparing several dose levels with a zero-dose control , 1986 .

[24]  E Shirley,et al.  A non-parametric equivalent of Williams' test for contrasting increasing dose levels of a treatment. , 1977, Biometrics.

[25]  G. Schett,et al.  Tenosynovitis and osteoclast formation as the initial preclinical changes in a murine model of inflammatory arthritis. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[26]  Maarten Boers,et al.  Progression of radiologic damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[27]  D. A. Williams A note on Shirley's nonparametric test for comparing several dose levels with a zero-dose control. , 1986, Biometrics.

[28]  C. Werning [Rheumatoid arthritis]. , 1983, Medizinische Monatsschrift fur Pharmazeuten.

[29]  H. Holman,et al.  Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. , 1980, Arthritis and rheumatism.