The discovery and comparison of symbolic magnitudes

[1]  H. Lau,et al.  Attention induces conservative subjective biases in visual perception , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  B. Partee.  Lexical semantics and compositionality. , 1995 .

[3]  C. Wynne.  Reinforcement accounts for transitive inference performance , 1995 .

[4]  K J Holyoak,et al.  Semantic congruity in symbolic comparisons: Evidence against an expectancy hypothesis , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  The Locus of the Semantic Congruity Effect in Comparative Judgmen ts. , 1975 .

[6]  Donald G. Jamieson,et al.  Relational judgments with remembered stimuli , 1975 .

[7]  Wolf Vanpaemel,et al.  Exemplar by feature applicability matrices and other Dutch normative data for semantic concepts , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[8]  C. L. Morgan.  An introduction to comparative psychology , 1900 .

[9]  R. Shepard,et al.  The internal representation of numbers , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  S. Phillips,et al.  Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. , 1998, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[11]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[12]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Numerical Values Leave a Semantic Imprint on Associated Signs in Monkeys , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  S. Dumais,et al.  Semantic association effects in a mental comparison task , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Kristen Grauman,et al.  Relative attributes , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[15]  K. Holyoak.  The form of analog size information in memory , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  B. Dosher,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article NOISE EXCLUSION IN SPATIAL ATTENTION , 2022 .

[17]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[18]  W. Banks,et al.  Semantic and perceptual processes in symbolic comparisons. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of two-choice decisions. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  A Semantic Congruity Effect in Children's Acquisition of High and Low , 1998 .

[21]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Cerebral Representations of Number, Size, and Luminance during Comparative Judgments , 2004, Neuron.

[22]  A. Antebi,et al.  Long Life A Matter of Taste (and Smell) , 2004, Neuron.

[23]  K J Holyoak,et al.  A positional discriminability model of linear-order judgments. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  The role of expectancy in comparative judgments , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[25]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  Positional discriminability in linear orderings , 1978 .

[26]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  A Recurrent Network Mechanism of Time Integration in Perceptual Decisions , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[28]  R. Rescorla.  A theory of pavlovian conditioning: The effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement , 1972 .

[29]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[30]  W. Banks,et al.  Semantic congruity effects in comparative judgments of magnitudes of digits. , 1976 .

[31]  T. Malim,et al.  Introduction Comparative psychology , 1998 .

[32]  W. Petrusic,et al.  Semantic congruity effects and theories of the comparison process. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Mark Steyvers,et al.  Topics in semantic representation. , 2007, Psychological review.

[34]  R. Moyer,et al.  Mental comparison and the symbolic distance effect , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  David Marr,et al.  VISION A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , 2009 .

[36]  K. Holyoak,et al.  A System for Relational Reasoning in Human Prefrontal Cortex , 1999 .

[37]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Functional Diversity of Plant–Pollinator Interaction Webs Enhances the Persistence of Plant Communities , 2005, PLoS biology.

[38]  Dustin J. Merritt,et al.  Mechanisms of inferential order judgments in humans (Homo sapiens) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). , 2011, Journal of comparative psychology.

[39]  J. Michel.  Morphological Changes in a Parasitic Nematode due to Acquired Resistance of the Host , 1967, Nature.

[40]  Jefferson E. Roy,et al.  Representation of Multiple, Independent Categories in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2010, Neuron.

[41]  David J. Freedman.  Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal and inferior temporal cortices , 2002 .

[42]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Semantic congruity affects numerical judgments similarly in monkeys and humans. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  T. Wickens.  Elementary Signal Detection Theory , 2001 .

[44]  R. J. Audley,et al.  Response instructions and the speed of relative judgements: I. Some experiments on brightness discrimination. , 1964 .

[45]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Beyond the number domain , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Development of Elementary Numerical Abilities: A Neuronal Model , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  Charles Kemp,et al.  The discovery of structural form , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Exact and Approximate Judgements of Visual and Auditory Numerosity: an Fmri Study , 2006 .

[49]  C B DE SOTO.  The predilection for single orderings. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[50]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Evidence for relational transposition. , 1954, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[51]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  The processing of associations versus the processing of relations and symbols: A systematic comparison , 1995 .

[52]  E. Shoben,et al.  Context effects in symbolic magnitude comparisons. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[53]  Wesley A. Mah,et al.  Cognitive reference points in judgments of symbolic magnitude , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[54]  E. J. Carter,et al.  Functional Imaging of Numerical Processing in Adults and 4-y-Old Children , 2006, PLoS biology.

[55]  David F. Marks,et al.  Relative judgment: A phenomenon and a theory , 1972 .

[56]  D. M. Green,et al.  Attention bands in absolute identification , 1976 .

[57]  R. Howard.  The semantic congruity effect: Some tests of the expectancy hypothesis , 1983 .

[58]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  ON THE MEETING OF SEMANTICS AND PERCEPTION , 1973 .

[59]  R J AUDLEY,et al.  RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS AND THE SPEED OF RELATIVE JUDGEMENTS. II. PITCH DISCRIMINATION. , 1964, British journal of psychology.

[60]  B. McGonigle,et al.  Are monkeys logical? , 1977, Nature.

[61]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Context affects the numerical semantic congruity effect in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) , 2010, Behavioural Processes.

[62]  De Soto Cb,et al.  The predilection for single orderings. , 1961 .

[63]  Michael Gasser,et al.  Learning to Talk About the Properties of Objects: A Network Model of the Development of Dimensions , 1997 .

[64]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. , 1969 .

[65]  R. Siegler,et al.  Development of Quantitative Thinking , 2012 .

[66]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex. , 2001, Science.

[67]  Craig Leth-Steensen,et al.  SNARC effects with numerical and non-numerical symbolic comparative judgments: instructional and cultural dependencies. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[68]  S. Dehaene.  Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[69]  A. Paivio,et al.  Semantic congruity and lexical marking in symbolic comparisons: An expectancy hypothesis , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[70]  S. Dehaene,et al.  A Magnitude Code Common to Numerosities and Number Symbols in Human Intraparietal Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[71]  Craig Leth-Steensen,et al.  Effects of instruction presentation mode in comparative judgments , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[72]  J. Snedeker,et al.  Compositionality and statistics in adjective acquisition: 4-year-olds interpret tall and short based on the size distributions of novel noun referents. , 2008, Child development.

[73]  T. Trabasso,et al.  On the construction and use of representations involving linear order , 1975 .

[74]  R. Moyer.  Comparing objects in memory: Evidence suggesting an internal psychophysics , 1973 .

[75]  Renske S. Hoedemaker,et al.  Embodied language comprehension: encoding-based and goal-driven processes. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[76]  J. Baranski,et al.  Semantic congruity effects in perceptual comparisons , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[77]  R M Nosofsky,et al.  Shifts of attention in the identification and discrimination of intensity , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[78]  M. Minami.  How Children Learn the Meanings of Words , 2001 .

[79]  W P Banks,et al.  Semantic congruity and expectancy in symbolic judgments. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[80]  Can pigeons really make transitive inferences , 1992 .

[81]  W. Banks,et al.  Single ordering as a processing limitation , 1982 .

[82]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Semantic Associations between Signs and Numerical Categories in the Prefrontal Cortex , 2007, PLoS biology.

[83]  A. Yuille,et al.  Bayesian generic priors for causal learning. , 2008, Psychological review.

[84]  Derek C. Penn,et al.  Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[85]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[86]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual processing. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[87]  Janice N. Steirn,et al.  Transitive inference in pigeons: Control for differential value transfer , 1997 .

[88]  Friederike Range,et al.  Familiarity and dominance relations among female sooty mangabeys in the Taï National Park , 2002, American journal of primatology.

[89]  S. Link.  Modeling imageless thought: The relative judgment theory of numerical comparisons ☆ , 1990 .

[90]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  Subjective Magnitude Information in Semantic Orderings. , 1976 .

[91]  Parthasarathy Krishnamurthy,et al.  Attribute Conflict in Consumer Decision Making: The Role of Task Compatibility , 2008 .

[92]  Dawn Chen,et al.  Generative Inferences Based on a Discriminative Bayesian Model of Relation Learning , 2013, CogSci.

[93]  Keith J Holyoak,et al.  Comparative judgments with numerical reference points , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[94]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[95]  G. Halford.  Children's Understanding: The Development of Mental Models , 1993 .

[96]  Edward J. Shoben,et al.  Multiple congruity effects in judgments of magnitude. , 1990 .

[97]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Structured statistical models of inductive reasoning. , 2009, Psychological review.

[98]  J. Staddon,et al.  Transitive inference formation in pigeons. , 1991 .

[99]  Leonidas A A Doumas,et al.  A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts. , 2008, Psychological review.

[100]  E. Tribushinina.  Reference points in linguistic construal: Scalar adjectives revisited , 2009 .

[101]  E. Miller,et al.  Coding of Cognitive Magnitude Compressed Scaling of Numerical Information in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[102]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  An Invitation to cognitive science , 1997 .

[103]  G. Halford.  Can young children integrate premises in transitivity and serial order tasks? , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[104]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  A probabilistic model of cross-categorization , 2011, Cognition.

[105]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[106]  M. Birnbaum,et al.  A theory of comparative response times and “difference” judgments , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[107]  L. Smith,et al.  Adults' Acquisition of Novel Dimension Words: Creating a Semantic Congruity Effect , 2000, The Journal of general psychology.

[108]  H. Davis.  Transitive inference in rats (Rattus norvegicus). , 1992, Journal of comparative psychology.

[109]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Children's ability to make transitive inferences: The importance of premise integration and structural complexity , 1998 .

[110]  B. Murdock,et al.  The distinctiveness of stimuli. , 1960, Psychological review.

[111]  Dawn Chen,et al.  Bayesian analogy with relational transformations. , 2012, Psychological review.

[112]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Storing and retrieving information about ordered relationships. , 1974 .

[113]  Robert L. Goldstone.  The role of similarity in categorization: providing a groundwork , 1994, Cognition.

[114]  S. Phillips,et al.  Relational knowledge: the foundation of higher cognition , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[115]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. , 1999, Psychological review.