Control or participate? The Yellow Vests’ democratic aspirations through mixed methods analysis

[1]  J. Pilet,et al.  Public Support for Deliberative Citizens' Assemblies Selected through Sortition:Evidence from 15 Countries , 2022, European Journal of Political Research.

[2]  Frédéric Gonthier,et al.  From the People, Like the People, or For the People? Candidate Appraisal Among the French Yellow Vests , 2022, Political Psychology.

[3]  I. M. Bergem.  Leaving the Discursive Definition of Populist Social Movements: The Case of the Yellow Vest Movement , 2022, Political Studies.

[4]  John R. Hibbing,et al.  Who do the people want to govern? , 2021, Party Politics.

[5]  H. Werner,et al.  Are Populists Sore Losers? Explaining Populist Citizens' Preferences for and Reactions to Referendums , 2021, British Journal of Political Science.

[6]  J. Pilet,et al.  Engaged, Indifferent, Skeptical or Critical? Disentangling Attitudes towards Local Deliberative Mini-Publics in Four Western European Democracies , 2021, Sustainability.

[7]  Thomas Aguilera,et al.  Les méthodes mixtes pour la science politique , 2021, Revue française de science politique.

[8]  Zakaria Bendali,et al.  Les sciences sociales en gilet jaune , 2021, Politix.

[9]  Camille Bedock,et al.  Une représentation sous contrôle : visions du système politique et réformes institutionnelles dans le mouvement des Gilets jaunes , 2021 .

[10]  S. Zmerli.  Notions of democracy in France: uncovering causes and consequences , 2021, French Politics.

[11]  Soraya Hamdaoui.  Anti-populism during the Yellow Vest protests: From combatting the Rassemblement National to dealing with street populists , 2021, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations.

[12]  E. Reungoat,et al.  Becoming Yellow Vests: The Politicization of Ordinary Citizens (France 2018-20) , 2020 .

[13]  Sebastien Rojon,et al.  Referendums: increasingly unpopular among the ‘winners’ of modernization? Comparing public support for the use of referendums in Switzerland, the Netherlands, the UK, and Hungary , 2020, Comparative European Politics.

[14]  D. Archibugi.  How social movements can save democracy: democratic innovations from below , 2020, International Affairs.

[15]  C. Bedock.  Citizens' Contrasting Aspirations About Their Political System: Entrustment, Participation, Identification and Control , 2020, Frontiers in Political Science.

[16]  Min Reuchamps,et al.  Sortition, its advocates and its critics: An empirical analysis of citizens’ and MPs’ support for random selection as a democratic reform proposal , 2020, International Political Science Review.

[17]  P. Webb.  Book review: The Participation Gap: Social Status and Political Inequality , 2020 .

[18]  A. Akkerman,et al.  Power to the people? Populism, democracy, and political participation: a citizen's perspective , 2020 .

[19]  J. Pilet,et al.  Enraged, Engaged, or Both? A Study of the Determinants of Support for Consultative vs. Binding Mini-Publics , 2020, Representation.

[20]  J. Pilet,et al.  Who Supports Citizens Selected by Lot to be the Main Policymakers? A Study of French Citizens , 2020, Government and Opposition.

[21]  Paris Aslanidis.  The social psychology of populism , 2020 .

[22]  Harald Schoen,et al.  When the Whole Is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts: On the Conceptualization and Measurement of Populist Attitudes and Other Multidimensional Constructs , 2020, American Political Science Review.

[23]  H. Werner.  If I'll win it, I want it: The role of instrumental considerations in explaining public support for referendums , 2019, European journal of political research.

[24]  Quentin Ravelli,et al.  Le Gilet et le Marteau. L’Assemblée des assemblées organise l’aile gauche des ronds-points , 2020, Mouvements.

[25]  J. Bunting.  Book Review: Oliver Fillieule and Erik Neveu (eds), Activists Forever? Long-Term Impacts of Political Activism , 2020, Sociology.

[26]  André Bächtiger,et al.  Deliberating or Thinking (Twice) About Democratic Preferences: What German Citizens Want From Democracy , 2020, Political Studies.

[27]  Frédéric Gonthier,et al.  Populist Attitudes among the French Yellow Vests , 2019, Populism.

[28]  L. Rouban.  La matière noire de la démocratie , 2019 .

[29]  R. Huber,et al.  Love at first sight? Populist attitudes and support for direct democracy , 2019, Party Politics.

[30]  Donatella della Porta,et al.  Innovating Democracy Against Democratic Stress in Europe: Social Movements and Democratic Experiments , 2019, Representation.

[31]  S. Bowler,et al.  Perceptions of Referendums and Democracy: The Referendum Disappointment Gap , 2019, Politics and Governance.

[32]  B. Klandermans,et al.  A Survey Experiment on Citizens’ Preferences for ‘Vote–Centric’ vs. ‘Talk–Centric’ Democratic Innovations with Advisory vs. Binding Outcomes , 2019, Politics and Governance.

[33]  C. Reinemann,et al.  The effects of populism as a social identity frame on persuasion and mobilisation: Evidence from a 15‐country experiment , 2019, European Journal of Political Research.

[34]  E. Grossman.  France’s Yellow Vests – Symptom of a Chronic Disease , 2019, Political Insight.

[35]  Cristina Flesher Fominaya,et al.  European anti-austerity and pro-democracy protests in the wake of the global financial crisis , 2017, Resisting Austerity.

[36]  P. Guillemin,et al.  Enquêter in situ par questionnaire sur une mobilisation , 2019, Revue française de science politique.

[37]  L. Jeanpierre.  In girum. Les leçons politiques des ronds-points , 2019, Revue Projet.

[38]  Érik Neveu.  Activists Forever? , 2018 .

[39]  A. Akkerman,et al.  The voice of populist people? Referendum preferences, practices and populist attitudes , 2018, Acta Politica.

[40]  Paris Aslanidis.  Populism as a Collective Action Master Frame for Transnational Mobilization , 2018 .

[41]  Anne Schulz,et al.  Measuring populist attitudes on three dimensions , 2018 .

[42]  G. Stoker,et al.  The Good Politician: Folk Theories, Political Interaction, and the Rise of Anti-Politics , 2018 .

[43]  Paris Aslanidis.  Populism and Social Movements , 2017 .

[44]  N. Sauger,et al.  Pourquoi détestons-nous autant nos politiques ? , 2017 .

[45]  Daniele Caramani.  Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government , 2017, American Political Science Review.

[46]  O. Macchi,et al.  Declassement sectoriel et rassemblement public , 2017 .

[47]  Paris Aslanidis.  Populist Social Movements of the Great Recession , 2016 .

[48]  R. Noonan.  Social movements in times of austerity: bringing capitalism back into protest analysis , 2016 .

[49]  Hanspeter Kriesi,et al.  Mobilization of protest in the age of austerity , 2016 .

[50]  M. Giugni,et al.  Do issues matter? anti-austerity protests' composition, values, and action repertoires compared , 2016 .

[51]  M. Giugni,et al.  The biographical impact of participation in social movement activities: beyond highly committed New Left activism , 2016 .

[52]  Claes H. de Vreese,et al.  Public support for referendums in Europe: a cross-national comparison in 21 countries , 2015 .

[53]  Brigitte Geissel,et al.  Can Democracy Be Saved? Participation, Deliberation and Social Movements , 2015 .

[54]  Anders Hylmö,et al.  Does class matter in anti-austerity protests? Social class, attitudes towards inequality, and political trust in European demonstrations in a time of economic crisis , 2015 .

[55]  H. Coffé,et al.  Education and Support for Representative, Direct and Stealth Democracy , 2014 .

[56]  A. Akkerman,et al.  How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters , 2014 .

[57]  P. Webb.  Who is willing to participate? Dissatisfied democrats, stealth democrats and populists in the United Kingdom , 2013 .

[58]  J. Stekelenburg,et al.  Social psychology of movement participation , 2013 .

[59]  Åsa Bengtsson.  La percepción del proceso político por parte de los ciudadanos. Una evaluación crítica de la consistencia de las preferencias y las preguntas de encuesta: Citizens' perceptions of political processes. A critical evaluation of preference consistency and survey items , 2012 .

[60]  Clare Saunders,et al.  Explaining differential protest participation: Novices, returners, repeaters, and stalwarts , 2012 .

[61]  K. Newton,et al.  Evaluating Democratic Innovations : Curing the Democratic Malaise? , 2012 .

[62]  Felipe González Castro,et al.  A Methodology for Conducting Integrative Mixed Methods Research and Data Analyses , 2010, Journal of mixed methods research.

[63]  D. Snow,et al.  Explaining the Puzzle of Homeless Mobilization: An Examination of Differential Participation , 2009 .

[64]  Mikko Mattila,et al.  Direct Democracy and its Critics: Support for Direct Democracy and ‘Stealth’ Democracy in Finland , 2009 .

[65]  Graham Smith.  Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation - Theories of Institutional Design , 2009 .

[66]  D. Lazer,et al.  Who Wants To Deliberate—And Why? , 2009, American Political Science Review.

[67]  Marie Meyer,et al.  For the people. , 2008, JEMS : a journal of emergency medical services.

[68]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry , 2007 .

[69]  Todd Donovan,et al.  Enraged or Engaged? Preferences for Direct Citizen Participation in Affluent Democracies , 2007 .

[70]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[71]  Dennis Westlind.  The Politics of Popular Identity: Understanding Recent Populist Movements in Sweden and the United States , 1996 .

[72]  Max Reinert,et al.  Alceste une méthodologie d'analyse des données textuelles et une application: Aurelia De Gerard De Nerval , 1990 .

[73]  Doug McAdam,et al.  THE BIOGRAPHICAL CONSEQUENCES OF ACTIVISM , 1989 .

[74]  P. Oliver.  "IF YOU DON'T DO IT, NOBODY ELSE WILL": ACTIVE AND TOKEN CONTRIBUTORS TO LOCAL COLLECTIVE ACTION* , 1984 .

[75]  Thomas Pogge,et al.  From New York City , 2003, Science.