Comparative morpho‐functional analysis of the humerus and ulna in three Western European moles species of the genus Talpa, including the newly described T. aquitania

The forelimb is involved in many behaviours including locomotion. Notably, the humero‐ulnar articulation, implicated in the elbow joint, is of particular importance for both mobility and stability. Functional constraints, induced in part by environmental plasticity, are thought to drive an important part of the bone shape as bone directly responds and remodels in response to both muscle and external forces. In this context, the study of subterranean moles is of particular interest. These moles occupy a hard and heavy medium in comparison with air or water, requiring a powerful body structure to shear and shift the soil. Their general morphology is therefore adapted to digging and to their subterranean lifestyle. The various morpho‐functional patterns, which drive diverse abilities according to the environment, are likely targets of natural selection and it is, therefore, useful to understand the relationships between the bone shape and their function. Here, we quantify, through 3D geometric morphometric methods, the interspecific variability in the morphology of the ulna and humerus of three Talpa species, including the new species Talpa aquitania, to infer their potential consequence in species digging performance. We also quantify shape covariation and morphological integration between the humerus and the ulna to test whether these bones evolve as a uniform functional unit or as more or less independent modules. Our results show that interspecific anatomical differences in the humerus and ulna exist among the three species. Shape changes are mostly located at the level of joints and muscle attachments. As the species tend to live in allopatry and the fossorial lifestyle induces strong ecological constraints, interspecific variations could be explained by the properties of the environment in which they live, such as the compactness of the soil. Our results also show that the humerus and ulna are highly integrated. The covariation between the humerus and ulna in moles is dominated by variation in the attachment areas and particularly of the attachment areas of shoulder muscles concerning the humerus, which affect the mechanical force deployed during locomotion and digging. This study also highlights that in the new species, T. aquitania, variations in anatomical structure (general shape and joints) exist and are related to the locality of collect of the individuals.

[1]  Adrian M. Altenhoff,et al.  Read2Tree: scalable and accurate phylogenetic trees from raw reads , 2022, bioRxiv.

[2]  Sansalone Gabriele,et al.  Trapped in the morphospace: The relationship between morphological integration and functional performance , 2022, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  J. Hugot,et al.  New data on the distribution of the two mole species Talpa aquitania Nicolas, Matinez-Vargas & Hugot, 2017 and T. europaea Linnaeus, 1758 in France based on museum and newly collected specimens , 2021, Zoosystema.

[4]  L. Schepartz,et al.  Three-dimensional geometric morphometric studies of modern human occipital variation , 2021, PloS one.

[5]  C. Klingenberg How Exactly Did the Nose Get That Long? A Critical Rethinking of the Pinocchio Effect and How Shape Changes Relate to Landmarks , 2020, Evolutionary Biology.

[6]  A. Herrel,et al.  Interrelations Between the Cranium, the Mandible and Muscle Architecture in Modern Domestic Dogs , 2020, Evolutionary Biology.

[7]  A. Houssaye,et al.  Disentangling biological variability and taphonomy: shape analysis of the limb long bones of the sauropodomorph dinosaur Plateosaurus , 2020, PeerJ.

[8]  A. Houssaye,et al.  A first glimpse at the influence of body mass in the morphological integration of the limb long bones: an investigation in modern rhinoceroses , 2020, Journal of anatomy.

[9]  P. Piras,et al.  Current Options for Visualization of Local Deformation in Modern Shape Analysis Applied to Paleobiological Case Studies , 2020, Frontiers in Earth Science.

[10]  J. Searle,et al.  What should we call the Levant mole? Unravelling the systematics and demography of Talpa levantis Thomas, 1906 sensu lato (Mammalia: Talpidae) , 2020, Mammalian Biology.

[11]  A. Herrel,et al.  Unravelling the hybrid vigor in domestic equids: the effect of hybridization on bone shape variation and covariation , 2019, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[12]  A. Houssaye,et al.  Interspecific variation in the limb long bones among modern rhinoceroses—extent and drivers , 2019, PeerJ.

[13]  S. Wroe,et al.  Impact of transition to a subterranean lifestyle on morphological disparity and integration in talpid moles (Mammalia, Talpidae) , 2019, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[14]  N. Giannini,et al.  A multiple peak adaptive landscape based on feeding strategies and roosting ecology shaped the evolution of cranial covariance structure and morphological differentiation in phyllostomid bats , 2019, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  E. Dumont,et al.  How moles destroy your lawn: the forelimb kinematics of eastern moles in loose and compact substrates , 2019, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  A. Cardini Integration and Modularity in Procrustes Shape Data: Is There a Risk of Spurious Results? , 2018, bioRxiv.

[17]  E. Hardouin,et al.  Divergent in shape and convergent in function: Adaptive evolution of the mandible in Sub‐Antarctic mice , 2018, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  Bryan S. McLean,et al.  Trait‐specific processes of convergence and conservatism shape ecomorphological evolution in ground‐dwelling squirrels , 2018, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  A. Herrel,et al.  Swimmers, Diggers, Climbers and More, a Study of Integration Across the Mustelids’ Locomotor Apparatus (Carnivora: Mustelidae) , 2018, Evolutionary Biology.

[20]  D. Adams,et al.  Rates of morphological evolution, asymmetry and morphological integration of shell shape in scallops , 2017, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[21]  M. Cassini,et al.  Distribution, spatial interaction and niche analysis in three species of European moles (genus Talpa, Soricomorpha: Mammalia) in Italy , 2017 .

[22]  A. Ivanović,et al.  Morphological integration of the kinetic skull in Natrix snakes , 2017 .

[23]  J. Hugot,et al.  Molecular data and ecological niche modelling reveal the evolutionary history of the common and Iberian moles (Talpidae) in Europe , 2017 .

[24]  C. Klingenberg Size, shape, and form: concepts of allometry in geometric morphometrics , 2016, Development Genes and Evolution.

[25]  V. Lebedev,et al.  An underground burst of diversity – a new look at the phylogeny and taxonomy of the genus Talpa Linnaeus, 1758 (Mammalia: Talpidae) as revealed by nuclear and mitochondrial genes , 2015 .

[26]  P. Piras,et al.  Talpa fossilis or Talpa europaea? Using geometric morphometrics and allometric trajectories of humeral moles remains from Hungary to answer a taxonomic debate , 2015 .

[27]  Anjali Goswami,et al.  Do constraints associated with the locomotor habitat drive the evolution of forelimb shape? A case study in musteloid carnivorans , 2015, Journal of anatomy.

[28]  A. Herrel,et al.  The shrew tamed by Wolff's law: Do functional constraints shape the skull through muscle and bone covariation? , 2015, Journal of morphology.

[29]  A. Haber The Evolution of Morphological Integration in the Ruminant Skull , 2015, Evolutionary Biology.

[30]  J. Pérez-Claros,et al.  Patterns of morphological integration in the appendicular skeleton of mammalian carnivores , 2015, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  H. Corporaal,et al.  Bones , 2014, ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim..

[32]  A. Goswami,et al.  The macroevolutionary consequences of phenotypic integration: from development to deep time , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  M. Richardson,et al.  Humerus development in moles (Talpidae, Mammalia) , 2014 .

[34]  J. Arias-Martorell,et al.  Brief communication: Developmental versus functional three-dimensional geometric morphometric-based modularity of the human proximal humerus. , 2014, American journal of physical anthropology.

[35]  Anne‐Claire Fabre,et al.  Morphological integration in the forelimb of musteloid carnivorans , 2014, Journal of anatomy.

[36]  P. Palmqvist,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Analysis of Morphological Evolution and Locomotor Performance of the Carnivoran Forelimb , 2014, PloS one.

[37]  Michael T Butcher,et al.  Muscle architecture and out‐force potential of the thoracic limb in the eastern mole (Scalopus aquaticus) , 2013, Journal of morphology.

[38]  A. Herrel,et al.  Does shape co‐variation between the skull and the mandible have functional consequences? A 3D approach for a 3D problem , 2013, Journal of anatomy.

[39]  Ariel E. Marcy,et al.  Morphological Adaptations for Digging and Climate-Impacted Soil Properties Define Pocket Gopher (Thomomys spp.) Distributions , 2013, PloS one.

[40]  Christian Peter Klingenberg,et al.  Visualizations in geometric morphometrics: How to read and how to make graphs showing shape changes , 2013 .

[41]  P. Gunz,et al.  Semilandmarks: a method for quantifying curves and surfaces , 2013 .

[42]  L. Teresi,et al.  Testing convergent and parallel adaptations in talpids humeral mechanical performance by means of geometric morphometrics and finite element analysis , 2012, Journal of morphology.

[43]  Andrea Cardini,et al.  Leaf Morphology, Taxonomy and Geometric Morphometrics: A Simplified Protocol for Beginners , 2011, PloS one.

[44]  J. Losos,et al.  CONVERGENCE, ADAPTATION, AND CONSTRAINT , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  P. D. Polly,et al.  Methods for Studying Morphological Integration and Modularity , 2010 .

[46]  A. Loy,et al.  Molecular systematics and evolutionary biogeography of the genus Talpa (Soricomorpha: Talpidae). , 2010, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[47]  M. Nogueira,et al.  ADAPTIVE RADIATIONS, ECOLOGICAL SPECIALIZATION, AND THE EVOLUTIONARY INTEGRATION OF COMPLEX MORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURES , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[48]  D. Yalden The anatomy of mole locomotion , 2009 .

[49]  N. Milne,et al.  A 3D geometric morphometric analysis of digging ability in the extant and fossil cingulate humerus , 2009 .

[50]  H. Pontzer,et al.  Understanding hind limb weight support in chimpanzees with implications for the evolution of primate locomotion. , 2009, American journal of physical anthropology.

[51]  F. Bookstein,et al.  The conceptual and statistical relationship between modularity and morphological integration. , 2007, Systematic biology.

[52]  R. M. Walter,et al.  Ground forces applied by galloping dogs , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[53]  D. Schmitt,et al.  Forelimb and hindlimb forces in walking and galloping primates. , 2006, American journal of physical anthropology.

[54]  Nathan M. Young,et al.  SERIAL HOMOLOGY AND THE EVOLUTION OF MAMMALIAN LIMB COVARIATION STRUCTURE , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[55]  M. Lechowicz,et al.  Alternative Designs and the Evolution of Functional Diversity , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[56]  Rebecca L. Young,et al.  Evolution of Morphological Integration: Developmental Accommodation of Stress‐Induced Variation , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[57]  Michael E Alfaro,et al.  Evolutionary Consequences of Many‐to‐One Mapping of Jaw Morphology to Mechanics in Labrid Fishes , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[58]  C. D. Hulsey,et al.  Many-to-One Mapping of Form to Function: A General Principle in Organismal Design?1 , 2005, Integrative and comparative biology.

[59]  J. Geisler,et al.  Patterns of evolutionary transformation in the humerus of moles (Talpidae, Mammalia): a character analysis , 2004 .

[60]  M. Motokawa Phylogenetic relationships within the family Talpidae (Mammalia: Insectivora) , 2004 .

[61]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans. , 2004, Journal of human evolution.

[62]  J. Cubo Pattern and process in constructional morphology , 2004, Evolution & development.

[63]  F. Barrionuevo,et al.  Developmental Stages and Growth Rate of the Mole Talpa occidentalis (Insectivora, Mammalia) , 2004 .

[64]  S. Renous,et al.  Cinefluorographical study of the burrowing movements in the common mole, Talpa europaea (Lipotyphla, Talpidae) , 2003 .

[65]  P. Lemelin,et al.  Origins of primate locomotion: gait mechanics of the woolly opossum. , 2002, American journal of physical anthropology.

[66]  H. Abe Soil hardness, a factor affecting the range expansion of Mogera wogura in Japan , 2001 .

[67]  F J Rohlf,et al.  Use of two-block partial least-squares to study covariation in shape. , 2000, Systematic biology.

[68]  J A Walker,et al.  Ability of geometric morphometric methods to estimate a known covariance matrix. , 2000, Systematic biology.

[69]  H. P. Whidden Comparative Myology of Moles and the Phylogeny of the Talpidae (Mammalia, Lipotyphla) , 2000 .

[70]  J. Bertram,et al.  Acceleration and balance in trotting dogs. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[71]  R. Fariña,et al.  Ulnar dimensions and fossoriality in armadillos , 1999 .

[72]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Morphometric Analysis of Old World Talpidae (Mammalia, Insectivora) Using Partial-Warp Scores , 1996 .

[73]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the Optimal Superimposition of Landmarks , 1990 .

[74]  Z. Zeng LONG‐TERM CORRELATED RESPONSE, INTERPOPULATION COVARIATION, AND INTERSPECIFIC ALLOMETRY , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[75]  T. Reynolds Mechanics of increased support of weight by the hindlimbs in primates. , 1985, American journal of physical anthropology.

[76]  A. Siegel,et al.  A robust comparison of biological shapes. , 1982, Biometrics.

[77]  J. Cheverud PHENOTYPIC, GENETIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL MORPHOLOGICAL INTEGRATION IN THE CRANIUM , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[78]  E. Nevo Adaptive Convergence and Divergence of Subterranean Mammals , 1979 .

[79]  S. Gould,et al.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[80]  J. Gower Generalized procrustes analysis , 1975 .

[81]  J. H. Hutchison FOSSIL TALPIDAE (lnsectivora, Mammalia) FROM THE LATER TERTIARY OF OREGON , 1968 .

[82]  E. C. Olson,et al.  A MATHEMATICAL MODEL APPLIED TO A STUDY OF THE EVOLUTION OF SPECIES , 1951 .

[83]  Stefan Schlager,et al.  Morpho and Rvcg – Shape Analysis in R: R-Packages for Geometric Morphometrics, Shape Analysis and Surface Manipulations , 2017 .

[84]  D. Adams,et al.  geomorph: Software for geometric morphometric analyses , 2016 .

[85]  J. Hugot,et al.  Preliminary note: Talpa aquitania nov. sp. (Talpidae, Soricomorpha) a new mole species from southwest France and north Spain , 2016 .

[86]  E. Casanave,et al.  Iheringia A geometric morphometric study of sex differences in the scapula , humerus and ulna of Chaetophractus villosus ( Xenarthra , Dasypodidae ) , 2016 .

[87]  Bernd Eggers,et al.  Bones Structure And Mechanics , 2016 .

[88]  A. Loy,et al.  Tracing the evolutionary history of Talpa europaea by mtDNA phylogeography and species distribution modelling: evidence of divergent lineages and climate change influence , 2015 .

[89]  Brian K. Hall,et al.  Fins into limbs : evolution, development, and transformation , 2006 .

[90]  P. D. Polly,et al.  Limbs in Mammalian Evolution , 2006 .

[91]  Bernd Hamann,et al.  Evolutionary morphing , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[92]  Martin Frieß,et al.  Fourier Descriptors, Procrustes Superimposition, and Data Dimensionality: An Example of Cranial Shape Analysis in Modern Human Populations , 2005 .

[93]  H. David Sheets,et al.  Geometric morphometrics for biologists : a primer , 2004 .

[94]  S. Renous,et al.  Caractéristiques morphologiques du membre antérieur de la taupe commune, Talpa europaea (Mammalia, Talpidae) , 1992 .

[95]  C. Goodall Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape , 1991 .

[96]  P. Crowcroft,et al.  The life of the mole (Talpa europaea Linnaeus) , 1960 .

[97]  B. Campbell The shoulder anatomy of the moles. A study in phylogeny and adaptation , 1939 .

[98]  L. F. Edwards Morphology of the Forelimb of the Mole (Scalops Aquaticus, L.) in Relation to its Fossorial Habits , 1937 .

[99]  A. Garrod Animal Locomotion , 1874, Nature.

[100]  R. A. Freeman Anatomy of the Shoulder and Upper Arm of the Mole (Talpa europoea). , 2022, Journal of anatomy and physiology.