First, you need a Gestalt: An interaction of bottom-up and top-down streams during the perception of the ambiguously rotating human walker

Our visual system combines sensory evidence with prior knowledge to produce a representation of an outside world. Here, we explored the limits of the feedforward computation using an ambiguously rotating human biological motion. Specifically, we investigated whether an overall rotation, which was added to all the displays used in the study, would be perceived when the point-light walker was presented upside-down, a condition that typically obliterates perception of a human Gestalt. We report that inversion of the point-light walker or the absence of an identifiable Gestalt abolished the perception of an overall rotation. Perception of rotation was restored if the human walker Gestalt could be identified (an upright walker), if observers were informed about the nature of the motion display, or if observers expected to see the rotation of an unknown dynamic object. This implies that a mathematically more complex human motion was accounted for before the remaining motion components could be used to infer an overall rotation. Our results indicate that the perceptual inference does not proceed in a hierarchical manner with the simpler components being identified first. Instead, prior knowledge acts as a starting point for the decomposition of an even relatively simple combination of two motions.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Perception and self-organized instability , 2012, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[2]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  The aesthetic aha: on the pleasure of having insights into Gestalt. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[3]  Ian M. Thornton Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Processing of Biological Motion , 2012 .

[4]  S. Sumi Upside-down Presentation of the Johansson Moving Light-Spot Pattern , 1984, Perception.

[5]  Steven W. Zucker,et al.  The Visual Hierarchy Mirage: Seeing Trees in a Graph , 2013, Shape Perception in Human and Computer Vision.

[6]  I Rock,et al.  Why do ambiguous figures reverse? , 1994, Acta psychologica.

[7]  A. Saygin Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  P. Sinha,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  A. Yuille,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.7 July 2006 Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition Vision as Bayesian inference: analysis by synthesis? , 2022 .

[10]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Active versus passive processing of biological motion , 2002, Perception.

[11]  Songjoo Oh The eyeglass reversal , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Alain de Cheveigné,et al.  Separation of concurrent harmonic sounds: Fundamental frequency estimation and a time-domain cancell , 1993 .

[13]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Repetitive TMS over posterior STS disrupts perception of biological motion , 2005, Vision Research.

[14]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[15]  N. Sutherland,et al.  Grouping Frequency Components of Vowels: When is a Harmonic not a Harmonic? , 1984 .

[16]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .

[17]  R. van Ee,et al.  Activation in Visual Cortex Correlates with the Awareness of Stereoscopic Depth , 2005 .

[18]  W. Prinz Common mechanisms in perception and action. , 2002 .

[19]  C. M. Mooney Age in the development of closure ability in children. , 1957, Canadian journal of psychology.

[20]  Richard L Gregory,et al.  Seeing Through Illusions , 2009 .

[21]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based visual routines: sprites , 2001, Cognition.

[23]  Steven M. Thurman,et al.  Physical and Biological Constraints Govern Perceived Animacy of Scrambled Human Forms , 2013, Psychological science.

[24]  Fred Cummins,et al.  Rapid Perceptual Switching of a Reversible Biological Figure , 2008, PloS one.

[25]  D. Burr,et al.  Combining visual and auditory information. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[26]  G. Buchsbaum A spatial processor model for object colour perception , 1980 .

[27]  J. Braun,et al.  DISPARATE TIME-COURSES OF ADAPTATION AND FACILITATION IN MULTI-STABLE PERCEPTION , 2013 .

[28]  M. Grabowecky,et al.  Long-Term Speeding in Perceptual Switches Mediated by Attention-Dependent Plasticity in Cortical Visual Processing , 2007, Neuron.

[29]  D. C. Beardslee,et al.  Readings in perception , 1958 .

[30]  A. de Cheveigné Cancellation model of pitch perception. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[32]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Recognizing people from their movement. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Sharon Poggenpohl,et al.  Laws of Seeing , 2012 .

[34]  Jim W Kay,et al.  Gender recognition from point-light walkers. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  P. B. Porter Another Puzzle-Picture , 1954 .

[36]  Giorgio Satta,et al.  Bidirectional Context-Free Grammar Parsing for Natural Language Processing , 1994, Artif. Intell..

[37]  M. Pavlova,et al.  Orientation specificity in biological motion perception , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  S. Schuman Sprites , 2001 .

[39]  R. Porter Progress in Brain Research , 1965, Nature.

[40]  Karl Verfaillie,et al.  Perception of biological motion: A stimulus set of human point-light actions , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[41]  Zygmunt Pizlo,et al.  From : Shape Perception in Human and Computer Vision , 2017 .

[42]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Brain States: Top-Down Influences in Sensory Processing , 2007, Neuron.

[43]  G. Orban,et al.  Specificity of regions processing biological motion , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[44]  S. Hochstein,et al.  The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Subconfigurations of the human form in the perception of biological motion displays. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[46]  J E Cutting,et al.  Masking the motions of human gait , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.