Structure-based engineering of a novel CD3ε-targeting antibody for reduced polyreactivity

ABSTRACT Bispecific antibodies continue to represent a growth area for antibody therapeutics, with roughly a third of molecules in clinical development being T-cell engagers that use an anti-CD3 binding arm. CD3 antibodies possessing cross-reactivity with cynomolgus monkey typically recognize a highly electronegative linear epitope at the extreme N-terminus of CD3 epsilon (CD3ε). Such antibodies have high isoelectric points and display problematic polyreactivity (correlated with poor pharmacokinetics for monospecific antibodies). Using insights from the crystal structure of anti-Hu/Cy CD3 antibody ADI-26906 in complex with CD3ε and antibody engineering using a yeast-based platform, we have derived high-affinity CD3 antibody variants with very low polyreactivity and significantly improved biophysical developability. Comparison of these variants with CD3 antibodies in the clinic (as part of bi- or multi-specifics) shows that affinity for CD3 is correlated with polyreactivity. Our engineered CD3 antibodies break this correlation, forming a broad affinity range with no to low polyreactivity. Such antibodies will enable bispecifics with improved pharmacokinetic and safety profiles and suggest engineering solutions that will benefit the large and growing sector of T-cell engagers.

[1]  J. Reichert,et al.  Antibodies to watch in 2023 , 2022, mAbs.

[2]  T. Knowles,et al.  Non-specificity as the sticky problem in therapeutic antibody development , 2022, Nature Reviews Chemistry.

[3]  G. Hummer,et al.  Structure of a fully assembled tumor-specific T cell receptor ligated by pMHC , 2022, Cell.

[4]  Meric A. Ovacik,et al.  Nonclinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Characterization of Anti-CD79b/CD3 T Cell-Dependent Bispecific Antibody Using a Surrogate Molecule: A Potential Therapeutic Agent for B Cell Malignancies , 2022, Pharmaceutics.

[5]  J. Zorn,et al.  Humanization of a strategic CD3 epitope enables evaluation of clinical T-cell engagers in a fully immunocompetent in vivo model , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Cholesterol inhibits TCR signaling by directly restricting TCR-CD3 core tunnel motility. , 2022, Molecular cell.

[7]  Jason T Giurleo,et al.  Generation of T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibodies with differentiated profiles of cytokine release and biodistribution by CD3 affinity tuning , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Xiufeng Wu,et al.  Dichotomous impact of affinity on the function of T cell engaging bispecific antibodies , 2021, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.

[9]  O. Demaria,et al.  Natural killer cell engagers in cancer immunotherapy: Next generation of immuno‐oncology treatments , 2021, European journal of immunology.

[10]  Jinming Yu,et al.  The landscape of bispecific T cell engager in cancer treatment , 2021, Biomarker research.

[11]  Ming Liu,et al.  Bispecific T cell engagers: an emerging therapy for management of hematologic malignancies , 2021, Journal of Hematology & Oncology.

[12]  L. Walker,et al.  Prolonged evolution of the human B cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection , 2021, Science Immunology.

[13]  Lisa E. Gralinski,et al.  Broad and potent activity against SARS-like viruses by an engineered human monoclonal antibody , 2021, Science.

[14]  Z. Zhou,et al.  Polyreactivity and polyspecificity in therapeutic antibody development: risk factors for failure in preclinical and clinical development campaigns , 2021, mAbs.

[15]  J. Dye,et al.  Broad neutralization of SARS-related viruses by human monoclonal antibodies , 2020, Science.

[16]  Meric A. Ovacik,et al.  Target arm affinities determine preclinical efficacy and safety of anti-HER2/CD3 bispecific antibody. , 2020, JCI insight.

[17]  H. Kettenberger,et al.  Heparin chromatography as an in vitro predictor for antibody clearance rate through pinocytosis , 2019, mAbs.

[18]  L. Walker,et al.  Affinity Maturation Enhances Antibody Specificity but Compromises Conformational Stability. , 2019, Cell reports.

[19]  Jia-huai Wang,et al.  Structural basis of assembly of the human T cell receptor–CD3 complex , 2019, Nature.

[20]  D. Ellerman Bispecific T-cell engagers: Towards understanding variables influencing the in vitro potency and tumor selectivity and their modulation to enhance their efficacy and safety. , 2019, Methods.

[21]  J. Desjarlais,et al.  Redirected T Cell Cytotoxicity in Cancer Therapy. , 2019, Annual review of medicine.

[22]  M. Reches,et al.  Nanoscale kinetic segregation of TCR and CD45 in engaged microvilli facilitates early T cell activation , 2018, Nature Communications.

[23]  James R. Apgar,et al.  Establishing in vitro in vivo correlations to screen monoclonal antibodies for physicochemical properties related to favorable human pharmacokinetics , 2018, mAbs.

[24]  Amy A. Lo,et al.  Relative Target Affinities of T-Cell–Dependent Bispecific Antibodies Determine Biodistribution in a Solid Tumor Mouse Model , 2018, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[25]  シャオチョン チェン,et al.  Anti-CD3 antibodies and methods of use , 2017 .

[26]  Ryan L. Kelly,et al.  Chaperone proteins as single component reagents to assess antibody nonspecificity , 2017, mAbs.

[27]  Jiahui Chen,et al.  Improvements to the APBS biomolecular solvation software suite , 2017, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[28]  F. Sánchez‐Madrid,et al.  CD69: from activation marker to metabolic gatekeeper , 2017, European journal of immunology.

[29]  Thomas D. Wu,et al.  Membrane-Proximal Epitope Facilitates Efficient T Cell Synapse Formation by Anti-FcRH5/CD3 and Is a Requirement for Myeloma Cell Killing , 2017, Cancer cell.

[30]  Genee Y. Lee,et al.  An anti-CD3/anti-CLL-1 bispecific antibody for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. , 2017, Blood.

[31]  K Dane Wittrup,et al.  Biophysical properties of the clinical-stage antibody landscape , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Sampath R. Kumar,et al.  Purification of common light chain IgG-like bispecific antibodies using highly linear pH gradients , 2017, mAbs.

[33]  L. Kozlowski IPC – Isoelectric Point Calculator , 2016, Biology Direct.

[34]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Large-scale sequence and structural comparisons of human naive and antigen-experienced antibody repertoires , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Ying Tang,et al.  The interplay of non-specific binding, target-mediated clearance and FcRn interactions on the pharmacokinetics of humanized antibodies , 2015, mAbs.

[36]  R. Kelley,et al.  Framework selection can influence pharmacokinetics of a humanized therapeutic antibody through differences in molecule charge , 2014, mAbs.

[37]  Yingda Xu,et al.  High-throughput screening for developability during early-stage antibody discovery using self-interaction nanoparticle spectroscopy , 2014, mAbs.

[38]  K Dane Wittrup,et al.  Addressing polyspecificity of antibodies selected from an in vitro yeast presentation system: a FACS-based, high-throughput selection and analytical tool. , 2013, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[39]  Pilar Martín,et al.  Is CD69 an effective brake to control inflammatory diseases? , 2013, Trends in molecular medicine.

[40]  Yamei Yu,et al.  How Natalizumab Binds and Antagonizes α4 Integrins* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[41]  Philip R. Evans,et al.  How good are my data and what is the resolution? , 2013, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[42]  Lisa J. Bernstein,et al.  A strategy for risk mitigation of antibodies with fast clearance , 2012, mAbs.

[43]  P. Tessier,et al.  Aggregation-resistant domain antibodies engineered with charged mutations near the edges of the complementarity-determining regions. , 2012, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[44]  D. Stock,et al.  General strategy for the generation of human antibody variable domains with increased aggregation resistance , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Sandeep Yadav,et al.  The influence of charge distribution on self-association and viscosity behavior of monoclonal antibody solutions. , 2012, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[46]  Linda O Narhi,et al.  High-throughput assessment of thermal and colloidal stability parameters for monoclonal antibody formulations. , 2011, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[47]  William F Weiss,et al.  High-throughput analysis of concentration-dependent antibody self-association. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[48]  Clemens Vonrhein,et al.  Data processing and analysis with the autoPROC toolbox , 2011, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[49]  R. Bass,et al.  N-terminal Glutamate to Pyroglutamate Conversion in Vivo for Human IgG2 Antibodies , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[50]  Maxim N. Artyomov,et al.  Polyreactivity increases the apparent affinity of anti-HIV antibodies by heteroligation , 2010, Nature.

[51]  T. Igawa,et al.  Reduced elimination of IgG antibodies by engineering the variable region. , 2010, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[52]  P. Emsley,et al.  Features and development of Coot , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[53]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2003 .

[54]  P. Bugelski,et al.  Monoclonal antibody-induced cytokine-release syndrome , 2009, Expert review of clinical immunology.

[55]  Carsten Reinhardt,et al.  Bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies for cancer therapy. , 2009, Cancer research.

[56]  D. Baker,et al.  RosettaHoles: Rapid assessment of protein core packing for structure prediction, refinement, design, and validation , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[57]  H. Einsele,et al.  Tumor Regression in Cancer Patients by Very Low Doses of a T Cell–Engaging Antibody , 2008, Science.

[58]  Sachdev S Sidhu,et al.  The intrinsic contributions of tyrosine, serine, glycine and arginine to the affinity and specificity of antibodies. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[59]  A. Lenhoff,et al.  Self-interaction nanoparticle spectroscopy: a nanoparticle-based protein interaction assay. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[60]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Phaser crystallographic software , 2007, Journal of applied crystallography.

[61]  Kevin Cowtan,et al.  research papers Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2005 .

[62]  S. Harrison,et al.  Crystal structure of a human CD3-ε/δ dimer in complex with a UCHT1 single-chain antibody fragment , 2004 .

[63]  T. Beddoe,et al.  Crystal structure of the human T cell receptor CD3εγ heterodimer complexed to the therapeutic mAb OKT3 , 2004 .

[64]  Jonathan S Marvin,et al.  Redesigning an antibody fragment for faster association with its antigen. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[65]  Antonio Lanzavecchia,et al.  Optimizing anti‐CD3 affinity for effective T cell targeting against tumor cells , 2002, European journal of immunology.

[66]  Rebecca C Wade,et al.  Biomolecular diffusional association. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[67]  R. Norel,et al.  Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[68]  S Vajda,et al.  Kinetics of desolvation-mediated protein-protein binding. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[69]  D. Myszka,et al.  Improving biosensor analysis , 1999, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[70]  K. Terao,et al.  Effects of SIVmac infection on peripheral blood CD4+CD8+ T lymphocytes in cynomolgus macaques. , 1999, Clinical immunology.

[71]  A. Bogan,et al.  Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[72]  J. Glusker Acta Crystallographica Section D , 2022 .

[73]  P. Rabinovitch,et al.  Stimulation of T cells through the CD3/T-cell receptor complex: role of cytoplasmic calcium, protein kinase C translocation, and phosphorylation of pp60c-src in the activation pathway , 1987, Molecular and cellular biology.