Static stability of Baseline-II blended wing- body aircraft at low subsonic speed: Investigation via computational fluid dynamics simulation

A study of the effect of canard to Baseline-II blended wing-body aircraft is presented here with emphasis on investigating contributions of canard's various setting angle to aerodynamic parameters and longitudinal static stability. A computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulation has been conducted at low subsonic speed to collect aerodynamic data and found that its aerodynamic trend is similar to many BWB aircraft and consistent to previous studies conducted in UiTM. Canard setting angle affects the value of lift-at-zero incidence of a BWB aircraft, although fairly small for current canard size that it is not adequate to produce positive pitching moment-at-zero lift. Baseline-II is partially, statically stable in longitudinal motion because of negative moment change w.r.t. lift change but it has equilibrium incidence angle that only produces negative lift. Larger canard and/or modification to Baseline-II wing-body are needed to overcome this flaw. The location of new reference point provides ‘comfortable’ static margin. Data and mathematical characteristic obtained from BL-IIA SP CFD simulation is comparable to those from wind tunnel experiment and both show satisfactory-to-good correlation to theoretical calculations.

[1]  Armando Vavalle,et al.  Aerodynamic considerations of blended wing body aircraft , 2004 .

[2]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[3]  Mark H Lowenberg,et al.  Stability and Control Assessment of a Blended-Wing-Body Airliner Configuration , 2005 .

[4]  Syta Saephan,et al.  Simulation of the Tumbling Behavior of Tailless Aircraft , 2006 .

[5]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  The challenge and promise of blended-wing-body optimization , 1998 .

[7]  Mark Page,et al.  Blended Wing Body analysis and design , 1997 .

[8]  M. V. Cook Flight Dynamics Principles , 1997 .

[9]  Sean Wakayama,et al.  AERODYNAMICS OF HIGH-SUBSONIC BLENDED-WING-BODY CONFIGURATIONS , 2003 .

[10]  Joseph Katz,et al.  Stall Resistance Features of Lifting-Body Airplane Configurations , 1998 .

[11]  de Castro,et al.  Flying and handling qualities of a fly-by-wire blended-wing-body civil transport aircraft , 2003 .

[12]  A. L Bolsunovsky,et al.  Flying wing—problems and decisions , 2001 .

[13]  Wilfried Becker,et al.  Implementation of a multi-level optimisation methodology within the e-design of a blended wing body☆ , 2004 .

[14]  Rizal Effendy Mohd Nasir,et al.  Aerodynamics of Blended Wing Body (BWB) Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) / Aman Mohd Ihsan Mamat … [et al.] , 2008 .

[15]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[16]  R. H. Liebeck,et al.  Design of the Blended-Wing-Body subsonic transport , 2002 .

[17]  Jan Roskam,et al.  Preliminary calculation of aerodynamic, thrust and power characteristics , 1987 .

[18]  Wahyu Kuntjoro,et al.  Experimental Results Analysis for UiTM BWB B aseline!I and Baseline!II UAV Running at 0.1 Mach number , 2010 .

[19]  R. H. Liebeck,et al.  Design of the Blended Wing Body Subsonic Transport , 2002 .

[20]  Robert Liebeck,et al.  BLENDED-WING-BODY SUBSONIC COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT , 1998 .