Virtual Water Scarcity Risk to the Global Trade System.

Local water scarcity risk (LWSR, meaning potential economic output losses in water-using sectors due to physical water scarcity) can be transmitted to downstream economies through the globalized supply chains. To understand the vulnerability of the global economy to water scarcity, we examine the impacts of local water scarcity risk on the global trade system from 1995 to 2009. We observe increasingly intensified geographical separation between physical water scarcity and production losses due to water scarcity. We identify top nation-sectors in virtual water scarcity risk (VWSR) exports (indicating local water scarcity risk in each nation transmitted to foreign nations through its exports), including agriculture and utilities in major economies such as China, India, Spain, France, and Turkey. These nation-sectors are critical to the resilience of the global economy to water scarcity. We also identify top nation-sectors in virtual water scarcity risk imports (indicating each nation's vulnerability to foreign water scarcity risk through the global trade system), highlighting their vulnerability to distant water scarcity. Our findings reveal the need for nations to collaboratively manage and conserve water resources, and lay the foundation for firms in high VWSR-importing sectors to develop strategies to mitigate such risk.

[1]  L. Ohisson,et al.  Water conflicts and social resource scarcity , 2000 .

[2]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Freshwater Vulnerability beyond Local Water Stress: Heterogeneous Effects of Water-Electricity Nexus Across the Continental United States. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  J. Oosterhaven,et al.  A New Approach to Modeling the Impact of Disruptive Events , 2016 .

[4]  João F. D. Rodrigues,et al.  Income-based environmental responsibility , 2012 .

[5]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  WATER. What scale for water governance? , 2015, Science.

[6]  Bhavik R Bakshi,et al.  A Water-Withdrawal Input-Output Model of the Indian Economy. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  A structural decomposition analysis of global energy footprints , 2016 .

[8]  Bart Los,et al.  THE CONSTRUCTION OF WORLD INPUT–OUTPUT TABLES IN THE WIOD PROJECT , 2013 .

[9]  M. Falkenmark.  The massive water scarcity now threatening Africa - why isn't it being addressed? , 1989 .

[10]  E. Dietzenbacher,et al.  An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input–Output Database: The Case of Global Automotive Production , 2015 .

[11]  A. Hirschman.  THE PATERNITY OF AN INDEX , 1964 .

[12]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Global Monthly Water Scarcity: Blue Water Footprints versus Blue Water Availability , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  Bhavik R Bakshi,et al.  Accounting for the biogeochemical cycle of nitrogen in input-output life cycle assessment. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Jan Oosterhaven,et al.  THE SUPPLY-DRIVEN INPUT-OUTPUT MODEL - A NEW INTERPRETATION BUT STILL IMPLAUSIBLE , 1989 .

[15]  James E. Rauch,et al.  Networks Versus Markets in International Trade , 1996 .

[16]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Imported water risk: the case of the UK , 2016 .

[17]  Rodney D. Ludema,et al.  Do terms-of-trade effects matter for trade agreements? Theory and evidence from WTO Countries* , 2013 .

[18]  Bhavik R Bakshi,et al.  Accounting for ecosystem services in Life Cycle Assessment, Part II: toward an ecologically based LCA. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  S. Pfister,et al.  Global Biodiversity Loss by Freshwater Consumption and Eutrophication from Swiss Food Consumption. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  A MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT TABLE BASED ON THE GLOBAL TRADE ANALYSIS PROJECT DATABASE (GTAP-MRIO) , 2013 .

[21]  Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al.  National water footprint accounts: the green, blue and grey water footprint of production and consumption , 2011 .

[22]  Steven B. Kraines,et al.  Examining the resilience of national energy systems: Measurements of diversity in production-based and consumption-based electricity in the globalization of trade networks , 2015 .

[23]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The green, blue and grey water footprint of farm animals and animal products , 2010 .

[24]  Arpita Ghosh,et al.  Input-Output Approach in an Allocation System , 1958 .

[25]  MR EE SUtIOT.  EXIOPOL-Development and illustrative analyses of a detailed global MR EE SUt / IOT , 2019 .

[26]  Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al.  Water scarcity challenges to business , 2014 .

[27]  M Falkenmark,et al.  Population and water resources: a delicate balance. , 1992, Population bulletin.

[28]  Ranran Wang,et al.  Hybrid Analysis of Blue Water Consumption and Water Scarcity Implications at the Global, National, and Basin Levels in an Increasingly Globalized World. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Stephan Pfister,et al.  COMPARISON OF BOTTOM-UP AND TOP-DOWN APPROACHES TO CALCULATING THE WATER FOOTPRINTS OF NATIONS , 2011 .

[30]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Criticality of Water: Aligning Water and Mineral Resources Assessment. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  F. Gassert,et al.  Aqueduct Country and River Basin Rankings , 2013 .

[32]  Peter H. Gleick,et al.  Basic Water Requirements for Human Activities: Meeting Basic Needs , 1996 .

[33]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Four billion people facing severe water scarcity , 2016, Science Advances.

[34]  Matthias Schroder,et al.  Input–Output Analysis , 2011 .

[35]  Arjen Y. Hoekstra,et al.  The global component of freshwater demand and supply: an assessment of virtual water flows between nations as a result of trade in agricultural and industrial products , 2008 .

[36]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crops products , 2011 .

[37]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Fresh water goes global , 2015, Science.

[38]  S. Pfister,et al.  Virtual scarce water in China. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  BUILDING EORA: A GLOBAL MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT DATABASE AT HIGH COUNTRY AND SECTOR RESOLUTION , 2013 .

[40]  Ming Xu,et al.  Income-Based Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Nations. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  Annie Levasseur,et al.  Area of concern: a new paradigm in life cycle assessment for the development of footprint metrics , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[42]  C. Chase-Dunn,et al.  Trade Globalization since 1795: Waves of Integration in the World-System , 2000, American Sociological Review.

[43]  S. Pfister,et al.  Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[44]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Trends in Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions from 1990 to 2010. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[45]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The water footprint of humanity , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Ming Xu,et al.  Socioeconomic Drivers of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the United States. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[47]  Richard Rushforth,et al.  The vulnerability and resilience of a city's water footprint: The case of Flagstaff, Arizona, USA , 2016 .

[48]  Erik Dietzenbacher,et al.  In Vindication of the Ghosh Model: A Reinterpretation as a Price Model , 1997 .

[49]  J. Oosterhaven.  ON THE PLAUSIBILITY OF THE SUPPLY-DRIVEN INPUT-OUTPUT MODEL , 1988 .

[50]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  International trade of scarce water , 2013 .