European Conference on Information Systems ( ECIS ) Summer 10-6-2011 ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF INTERNET BANKING : A DIGITAL DIVIDE PERSPECTIVE

Internet banking offers major advantages for both banks and their customers. However, not all people have equal access or skills to use such services. As banks are interested in migrating customers online, they need to reveal the conditions of internet banking services acceptance and use. The main objective of this study is to understand the factors influencing internet banking adoption taking into account insights from the digital divide theory. In order to explain internet banking usage we developed a research model drawing from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and Digital Divide research. Moreover, a qualitative pre-study has led to the creation of a new construct: perceived security. The model was tested against comprehensive survey data (n = 503). As a result, more than 90% of the variance of internet banking usage was explained by the elaborated model. Results demonstrate that the strongest factor influencing the intention to adopt internet banking services is the degree to which an individual believes that it is safe to use such services. Hence, this paper contributes to existing technology acceptance literature by introducing the construct of perceived security. Other major implications for theory and practice are discussed.

[1]  Nor,et al.  Malay, Chinese, and internet banking , 2010 .

[2]  Elena Gorbacheva,et al.  Analysis of e-inclusion projects in Russia, Austria and Switzerland , 2010, Interact. Technol. Smart Educ..

[3]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Research Note - Social Interactions and the "Digital Divide": Explaining Variations in Internet Use , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  France Bélanger,et al.  The impact of the digital divide on e-government use , 2009, CACM.

[5]  Faridah Hassan,et al.  Corporate Customers' Adoption of Internet Banking: Case of Klang Valley Business Firm in Malaysia , 2009 .

[6]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A critical look at partial least squares modeling , 2009 .

[7]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  The Digital Divide in E-Government – A Quantitative Analysis [Invited Paper] , 2008 .

[8]  A. Mashhour,et al.  Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce a Framework for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Information Systems at Jordan Banks: an Empirical Study , 2022 .

[9]  J. Michael Pearson,et al.  Internet banking in Jordan: The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) perspective , 2007, J. Syst. Inf. Technol..

[10]  C. Flavián,et al.  How bricks‐and‐mortar attributes affect online banking adoption , 2006 .

[11]  James F. Devlin,et al.  Why consumers are not using internet banking: a qualitative study , 2006 .

[12]  Perry R. Hinton SPSS Explained , 2004 .

[13]  Fotini Nteli,et al.  Internet banking in the UK: Why are there not more customers? , 2004 .

[14]  J. Kolodinsky,et al.  The adoption of electronic banking technologies by US consumers , 2004 .

[15]  M. Speece,et al.  Barriers to Internet banking adoption: a qualitative study among corporate customers in Thailand , 2003 .

[16]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[17]  Kate E. Stewart,et al.  A Delphi study of Internet banking , 2003 .

[18]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[19]  Shaohan Cai,et al.  The key determinants of Internet banking service quality: a content analysis , 2001 .

[20]  Rowena Cullen,et al.  Addressing the digital divide , 2001, Online Inf. Rev..

[21]  Swinder Janda,et al.  A phenomenological investigation of Internet usage among older individuals , 2000 .

[22]  J. Cuevas The Internet Banking Horizon: Bleak or Bright for Community Banks? , 1998 .

[23]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[24]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[25]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[26]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[27]  Martin Fishbein,et al.  Readings in attitude theory and measurement , 1968 .

[28]  R. Elashoff,et al.  Missing Observations in Multivariate Statistics I. Review of the Literature , 1966 .

[29]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[30]  F. N. David,et al.  Principles and procedures of statistics. , 1961 .