The possibility of defining effective potentials from known protein structures, which are sufficiently accurate to be used for protein-structure-prediction purposes, is investigated. Three types of distance potentials and three types of backbone torsion potentials are defined, based on propensities of amino acid pairs to be separated by a given spatial distance or to be associated to a backbone torsion angle domain. Their differences reside in the way the physical correlations between the amino acids and the conformational states are extracted from the bulk interactions due to the presence of many residues in a protein. For the distance potentials, a physical meaning can be associated to the different definitions, given that some of the potentials favor hydrophobic interactions and others favor interactions between oppositely charged residues. The performance of the different torsion and distance potentials in structure prediction procedures, in particular native-fold recognition and evaluation of protein stability changes upon point mutations, is analyzed. It appears to differ according to the specific proteins and protein environments. In particular, one of the distance potentials performs better than the others for membrane proteins and in protein regions involving charged residues, but less well in other protein regions. Furthermore, the dependence of the potentials on the characteristics of the proteins from which they are derived is analyzed. It is shown that the dependence of the potentials on the length, amino acid composition and secondary-structure content of the proteins from the dataset is either very limited or rather strong, according to the type of potential. The results obtained suggest that the main problem limiting the performance of database-derived potentials is their lack of universality: each potential describes with satisfactory accuracy only the interactions present in certain protein environments.
[1]
D Gilis,et al.
Stability changes upon mutation of solvent-accessible residues in proteins evaluated by database-derived potentials.
,
1996,
Journal of molecular biology.
[2]
G. Crippen.
Prediction of protein folding from amino acid sequence over discrete conformation spaces.
,
1991,
Biochemistry.
[3]
L A Mirny,et al.
How to derive a protein folding potential? A new approach to an old problem.
,
1996,
Journal of molecular biology.
[4]
K Yue,et al.
Folding proteins with a simple energy function and extensive conformational searching
,
1996,
Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[5]
F E Cohen,et al.
Evaluation of current techniques for Ab initio protein structure prediction
,
1995,
Proteins.
[6]
M J Rooman,et al.
Are database-derived potentials valid for scoring both forward and inverted protein folding?
,
1995,
Protein engineering.
[7]
G. Crippen,et al.
Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins.
,
1992,
Journal of molecular biology.
[8]
U. Hobohm,et al.
Enlarged representative set of protein structures
,
1994,
Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[9]
S. Wodak,et al.
Protein structure prediction by threading methods: Evaluation of current techniques
,
1995,
Proteins.
[10]
A. Godzik,et al.
Sequence-structure matching in globular proteins: application to supersecondary and tertiary structure determination.
,
1992,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[11]
Temple F. Smith,et al.
Global optimum protein threading with gapped alignment and empirical pair score functions.
,
1996,
Journal of molecular biology.