Computational intelligence methods for the efficient reliability analysis of complex flood defence structures

With the continual rise of sea levels and deterioration of flood defence structures over time, it is no longer appropriate to define a design level of flood protection, but rather, it is necessary to estimate the reliability of flood defences under varying and uncertain conditions. For complex geotechnical failure mechanisms, it is often necessary to employ computationally expensive finite element methods to analyse defence and soil behaviours; however, methods available for structural reliability analysis are generally not suitable for direct application to such models where the limit state function is only defined implicitly. In this study, an artificial neural network is used as a response surface function to efficiently emulate the complex finite element model within a Monte Carlo simulation. To ensure the successful and robust implementation of this approach, a genetic algorithm adaptive sampling method is designed and applied to focus sampling of the implicit limit state function towards the limit state region in which the accuracy of the estimated response is of the greatest importance to the estimated structural reliability. The accuracy and gains in computational efficiency obtainable using the proposed method are demonstrated when applied to the 17th Street Canal flood wall which catastrophically failed when Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans in 2005.

[1]  Angus R. Simpson,et al.  Leak Detection and Calibration Using Transients and Genetic Algorithms , 2000 .

[2]  D. M. Titterington,et al.  Neural Networks: A Review from a Statistical Perspective , 1994 .

[3]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[4]  J. K. Vrijling,et al.  Probabilistic assessment of the flood wall at 17 th Street Canal , New , 2002 .

[5]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Reliability-based structural optimization using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation , 2002 .

[6]  Jorge E. Hurtado,et al.  Neural-network-based reliability analysis: a comparative study , 2001 .

[7]  Jin Cheng,et al.  Reliability analysis of structures using artificial neural network based genetic algorithms , 2008 .

[8]  T. Kohonen.  Self-organized formation of topology correct feature maps , 1982 .

[9]  C. Bucher,et al.  On Efficient Computational Schemes to Calculate Structural Failure Probabilities , 1989 .

[10]  Jorge E. Hurtado,et al.  Analysis of one-dimensional stochastic finite elements using neural networks , 2002 .

[11]  B. Gouldby,et al.  Discussion: A methodology for regional-scale flood risk assessment , 2009 .

[12]  Jorge E. Hurtado,et al.  An examination of methods for approximating implicit limit state functions from the viewpoint of statistical learning theory , 2004 .

[13]  Sang Hyo Kim,et al.  Response surface method using vector projected sampling points , 1997 .

[14]  P.H.A.J.M. van Gelder,et al.  Probabilistic Finite Elements With Dynamic Limit Bounds; A Case Study: 17th Street Flood Wall, New Orleans , 2008 .

[15]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Probalilistic assessment of the flood wall at 17th Street Canal, New Orleans , 2007 .

[16]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[17]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Vulnerability analysis of large concrete dams using the continuum strong discontinuity approach and neural networks , 2008 .

[18]  Thomas Most,et al.  Probabilistic analysis of concrete cracking using neural networks and random fields , 2007 .

[19]  Micha Werner,et al.  Reduction of Monte-Carlo simulation runs for uncertainty estimation in hydrological modelling , 2003 .

[20]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[21]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Structural reliability analyis of elastic-plastic structures using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation , 1996 .

[22]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Optimal division of data for neural network models in water resources applications , 2002 .

[23]  Plaxis Bulletin,et al.  PLAXIS FINITE ELEMENT CODE FOR SOIL AND ROCK ANALYSES , 2005 .

[24]  M. Pitt.  Learning lessons from the 2007 floods , 2008 .

[25]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[26]  Peter G. Nicholson,et al.  Reconnaissance of levee failures after hurricane Katrina , 2008 .

[27]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction , 1987 .

[28]  Qiusheng Li,et al.  A new artificial neural network-based response surface method for structural reliability analysis , 2008 .

[29]  W. Pitts,et al.  A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity (1943) , 2021, Ideas That Created the Future.

[30]  R. Dawson,et al.  A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment , 2003 .

[31]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis , 1993 .

[32]  T. Kohonen.  Self-organized formation of topographically correct feature maps , 1982 .

[33]  Bernt J. Leira,et al.  Reliability analysis of large structural systems , 2012 .