The impact of future scenarios on building refurbishment strategies towards plus energy buildings

Abstract Buildings account for 40% of total global energy consumption. The International Energy Agency (IEA) and the European Commission (EC) are attempting to achieve an 80% reduction in global emissions by 2050. The objectives of this paper are to identify the refurbishment scenario with the lowest environmental impact using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and to assess the scenario’s robustness to future climate change scenarios using a sensitivity analysis. We applied and verified the proposed approach in a residential case study of a reference project located in Kapfernberg, Austria. The environmental assessment included two facade refurbishment proposals (minimum and high quality with respect to energy), onsite energy generation (using solar thermal collectors and photovoltaic (PV) panels), one renewable future energy mix and the effects of climate change according to the Austrian Panel on Climate Change (APCC). The environmental indicators used in the assessment were the cumulative energy demand non-renewable (CED n. ren.), global warming potential (GWP) and ecological scarcity (UBP) over building life cycles. The results indicated that a high-quality refurbishment of the thermal envelope with prefabricated facade elements, including solar thermal collectors and PV panels, represented the optimal refurbishment. In terms of the environmental indicators, the high-quality refurbishment scenario is always beneficial throughout the building’s life cycle. Additionally, the sensitivity analysis of the high-quality refurbishment scenario found an increasing production of surplus electricity with increasing PV area. This surplus of energy provides greater benefit in the short term with the current energy mix. Once the energy from the grid is shifted to renewable sources, the added benefit is decreased. Therefore, it is necessary to find an optimal balance between diminishing returns due to changes in the future energy mix and the financial investment made over the lifetime of the building, especially for plus energy buildings. However the findings from this specific case study need to be evaluated for other refurbishment cases, taking into account future local climate change and energy supply mix scenarios in other regions.

[1]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review , 2014 .

[2]  Azra Korjenic,et al.  Impacts of climate change upon cooling and heating energy demand of office buildings in Vienna, Austria , 2014 .

[3]  Lars Junghans.  Sequential equi-marginal optimization method for ranking strategies for thermal building renovation , 2013 .

[4]  Adolf Acquaye,et al.  Operational vs. embodied emissions in buildings—A review of current trends , 2013 .

[5]  Neil Hewitt,et al.  Zero carbon buildings refurbishment--A Hierarchical pathway , 2011 .

[6]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Building energy-efficiency standards in a life cycle primary energy perspective , 2011 .

[7]  Ecem Edis,et al.  An environmental and economic sustainability assessment method for the retrofitting of residential buildings , 2014 .

[8]  Marine Fouquet,et al.  Methodological challenges and developments in LCA of low energy buildings: Application to biogenic carbon and global warming assessment , 2015 .

[9]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  The ecoinvent database system: a comprehensive web-based LCA database , 2005 .

[10]  L. Mundaca,et al.  Exploring transaction costs in passive house-oriented retrofitting , 2016 .

[11]  Attila Talamon,et al.  Generalized residential building typology for urban climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies: The case of Hungary , 2013 .

[12]  Eike Musall,et al.  Zero Energy Building A review of definitions and calculation methodologies , 2011 .

[13]  Magdalena Svanström,et al.  Life cycle assessment of construction materials: the influence of assumptions in end-of-life modelling , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[14]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a single-family residence built to either conventional- or passive house standard , 2012 .

[15]  Maryam Mirhadi Fard,et al.  Differentiating among low-energy, low-carbon and net-zero-energy building strategies for policy formulation , 2012 .

[16]  R. Samson,et al.  Assessing non-marginal variations with consequential LCA: Application to European energy sector , 2011 .

[17]  Rolf Frischknecht,et al.  Life cycle assessment in the building sector: analytical tools, environmental information and labels , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[18]  Ravi Prakash,et al.  Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview , 2010 .

[19]  Johan Braet,et al.  Life cycle assessment of an apartment building : comparison of an attributional and consequential approach , 2014 .

[20]  Xiaohua Xia,et al.  A multiple objective optimisation model for building energy efficiency investment decision , 2013 .

[21]  Helmuth Kreiner,et al.  The Application of LCA calculation methods in building certification systems in Austria , 2014 .

[22]  Jose L. Fernandez-Solis,et al.  System boundary for embodied energy in buildings: A conceptual model for definition , 2013 .

[23]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules , 2012 .

[24]  Helmuth Kreiner,et al.  A new systemic approach to improve the sustainability performance of office buildings in the early design stage , 2015 .

[25]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Cost-optimum analysis of building fabric renovation in a Swedish multi-story residential building , 2014 .

[26]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Life cycle primary energy implication of retrofitting a wood-framed apartment building to passive house standard , 2010 .

[27]  Fabian Levihn,et al.  Big meter data analysis of the energy efficiency potential in Stockholm's building stock , 2014 .

[28]  R. Frischknecht,et al.  Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. ecoinvent report No. 3, v2.2 , 2010 .

[29]  Holger Wallbaum,et al.  Environmental product declarations entering the building sector: critical reflections based on 5 to 10 years experience in different European countries , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[30]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  Roman Smutny,et al.  Results of DGNB certified sustainable buildings. Austrian case study focussing on the environmental life cycle performance (LCA) , 2014 .

[32]  Manuela Guedes de Almeida,et al.  Development of prefabricated retrofit module towards nearly zero energy buildings , 2013 .

[33]  Matthias Haase,et al.  A zero emission concept analysis of a single family house , 2014 .

[34]  Liana Müller,et al.  Passive House at the Crossroads: The Past and the Present of a Voluntary Standard That Managed to Bridge the Energy Efficiency Gap , 2013 .

[35]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[36]  Amaryllis Audenaert,et al.  Improving the energy performance of residential buildings: A literature review , 2015 .

[37]  Birgit Dagrun Risholt,et al.  Sustainability assessment of nearly zero energy renovation of dwellings based on energy, economy and home quality indicators , 2013 .

[38]  Karsten Voss,et al.  Net zero energy buildings: A consistent definition framework , 2012 .

[39]  Thomas Lützkendorf,et al.  Net-zero buildings: incorporating embodied impacts , 2015 .

[40]  Alice Moncaster,et al.  A method and tool for ‘cradle to grave’ embodied carbon and energy impacts of UK buildings in compliance with the new TC350 standards , 2013 .

[41]  Thomas Lützkendorf,et al.  Energy Efficiency of Buildings: The Aspect of Embodied Energy , 2016 .

[42]  Xiaohua Xia,et al.  A multi-objective optimization model for the life-cycle cost analysis and retrofitting planning of buildings , 2014 .

[43]  L. Elghali,et al.  Climate change influence on building lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions: Case study of a UK mixed-use development , 2012 .

[44]  Björn Berggren,et al.  LCE analysis of buildings - Taking the step towards Net Zero Energy Buildings , 2013 .

[45]  Delia D׳Agostino,et al.  Assessment of the progress towards the establishment of definitions of Nearly Zero Energy Buildings (nZEBs) in European Member States , 2015 .

[46]  Helmuth Kreiner,et al.  Assessment of the environmental performance of buildings: A critical evaluation of the influence of technical building equipment on residential buildings , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[47]  Badea Nicolae,et al.  Life cycle analysis in refurbishment of the buildings as intervention practices in energy saving , 2015 .

[48]  Paul Strachan,et al.  Achieving a holistic view of the life cycle performance of existing dwellings , 2013 .

[49]  Sanja Petrović Bećirović,et al.  Methodology and results of Serbian Energy-Efficiency Refurbishment Project , 2013 .

[50]  Paul Cooper,et al.  Existing building retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art , 2012 .

[51]  Johan Braet,et al.  Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review , 2013 .

[52]  Hongxing Yang,et al.  Review on life cycle assessment of energy payback and greenhouse gas emission of solar photovoltaic systems , 2013 .