Cleaning Up the Mess: Redevelopment of Urban Brownfields

This article explores the impact of a brownfield redevelopment initiative in the state of Michigan. Although such programs are often perceived as having a positive impact, there is remarkably little evidence beyond anecdotal examples to support such claims. The reported analysis is based on a 5-year project to create a database capable of assessing the impact of the Michigan program. Findings indicate that a viable market for brownfield redevelopment has been created since the change in Michigan brownfield law. On average, brownfield sites have shown a decline in quality over time; however, many sites demonstrated significant improvement.

[1]  Michael R. Thomas A GIS-based decision support system for brownfield redevelopment , 2002 .

[2]  K. Wernstedt,et al.  Brownfields regulatory reform and policy innovation in practice , 2006 .

[3]  Christopher A. De Sousa,et al.  Unearthing the benefits of brownfield to green space projects: An examination of project use and quality of life impacts , 2006 .

[4]  Lauren C. Heberle,et al.  Incentives for private residential brownfields development in US urban areas , 2006 .

[5]  M. Greenberg,et al.  Brownfields, Toads, and the Struggle for Neighborhood Redevelopment , 2000 .

[6]  M. Bjelland Brownfield Sites in Minneapolis-St. Paul: The Interwoven Geographies of Industrial Disinvestment and Environmental Contamination , 2004 .

[7]  Lauren C. Heberle,et al.  Understanding brownfields regeneration in the US , 2006 .

[8]  H. Whitney Cities and Superfund: Encouraging Brownfield Redevelopment , 2003 .

[9]  Laura Solitare,et al.  Prerequisite conditions for meaningful participation in brownfields redevelopment , 2005 .

[10]  Girija William Page,et al.  Characteristics and land use of contaminated brownfield properties in voluntary cleanup agreement programs , 2006 .

[11]  Adjo Amekudzi,et al.  Integrating Brownfields Redevelopment with Transportation Planning , 2004 .

[12]  Michael Greenberg,et al.  Measuring the success of the federal government's Brownfields Program , 2005 .

[13]  Hunter Bacot,et al.  Establishing Indicators to Evaluate Brownfield Redevelopment , 2006 .

[14]  Sue McNeil,et al.  Clean It and They Will Come? Defining Successful Brownfield Development , 2004 .

[15]  K L Johnson,et al.  BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING IN THE PHILADELPHIA REGION , 2002 .

[16]  Sue McNeil,et al.  Brownfield Development: Tools for Stewardship , 2004 .

[17]  C. D. De Sousa Policy Performance and Brownfield Redevelopment in Milwaukee, Wisconsin , 2005 .

[18]  Nii O. Attoh-Okine,et al.  Use of Belief Function in Brownfield Infrastructure Redevelopment Decision-Making , 2001 .

[19]  T. S. Davis,et al.  Brownfields: A Comprehensive Guide to Redeveloping Contaminated Property , 1997 .

[20]  R. Swartz Michigan's Approach to Urban Redevelopment Involving Contaminated Properties , 1994 .

[21]  C. Sousa Policy Performance and Brownfield Redevelopment in Milwaukee, Wisconsin* , 2005 .

[22]  Sarah L. Coffin,et al.  Modeling the relationship among brownfields, property values, and community revitalization , 2005 .

[23]  Sue McNeil,et al.  Assessing extrajurisdictional and areawide impacts of clustered brownfield developments , 2003 .

[24]  Sara S. Metcalf,et al.  The Dynamics of Brownfield Redevelopment , 2011 .