Emission Flux Measurement Error with a Mobile DOAS System and Application to NOx Flux Observations

Mobile differential optical absorption spectroscopy (mobile DOAS) is an optical remote sensing method that can rapidly measure trace gas emission flux from air pollution sources (such as power plants, industrial areas, and cities) in real time. Generally, mobile DOAS is influenced by wind, drive velocity, and other factors, especially in the usage of wind field when the emission flux in a mobile DOAS system is observed. This paper presents a detailed error analysis and NOx emission with mobile DOAS system from a power plant in Shijiazhuang city, China. Comparison of the SO2 emission flux from mobile DOAS observations with continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) under different drive speeds and wind fields revealed that the optimal drive velocity is 30–40 km/h, and the wind field at plume height is selected when mobile DOAS observations are performed. In addition, the total errors of SO2 and NO2 emissions with mobile DOAS measurements are 32% and 30%, respectively, combined with the analysis of the uncertainties of column density, wind field, and drive velocity. Furthermore, the NOx emission of 0.15 ± 0.06 kg/s from the power plant is estimated, which is in good agreement with that from CEMS observations of 0.17 ± 0.07 kg/s. This study has significantly contributed to the measurement of the mobile DOAS system on emission from air pollution sources, thus improving estimation accuracy.

[1]  Robert A. Sutherland,et al.  A quantitative method for estimating Pasquill stability class from windspeed and sensible heat flux density , 1986 .

[2]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Quantification of total emission of air pollutants from Beijing using mobile mini-DOAS , 2008 .

[3]  Stefan Kraus,et al.  DOASIS: a framework design for DOAS , 2006 .

[4]  Johannes Orphal,et al.  Measurements of molecular absorption spectra with the SCIAMACHY pre-flight model: instrument characterization and reference data for atmospheric remote-sensing in the 230–2380 nm region , 2003 .

[5]  Michael B. McElroy,et al.  Constraint of anthropogenic NO x emissions in China from different sectors: a new methodology using multiple satellite retrievals , 2009 .

[6]  James R. Drummond,et al.  MANTRA ‐ A Balloon Mission to Study the Odd‐Nitrogen Budget of the Stratosphere , 2005 .

[7]  A. McGonigle,et al.  A miniaturised ultraviolet spectrometer for remote sensing of SO2 fluxes: a new tool for volcano surveillance , 2003 .

[8]  Klaus Pfeilsticker,et al.  The Monte Carlo atmospheric radiative transfer model McArtim: Introduction and validation of Jacobians and 3D features , 2011 .

[9]  Claudia Rivera,et al.  Tula industrial complex (Mexico) emissions of SO 2 and NO 2 during the MCMA 2006 field campaign using a mobile mini-DOAS system , 2009 .

[10]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1997 .

[11]  Wenwei Che,et al.  A highly resolved temporal and spatial air pollutant emission inventory for the Pearl River Delta region, China and its uncertainty assessment , 2009 .

[12]  R. Harrison Introduction to atmospheric chemistry , 2000 .

[13]  Yang Jingwen,et al.  The Application of MM5 Wind Data in Monitoring of Regional Pollution Based on Passive DOAS under Different Atmospheric Stability Conditions in China , 2012, 2012 2nd International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering.

[14]  Ulrich Platt,et al.  Car MAX-DOAS measurements around entire cities: quantification of NOx emissions from the cities of Mannheim and Ludwigshafen (Germany) , 2010 .

[15]  Michel Van Roozendael,et al.  Measurements of Tropospheric NO2 in Romania Using a Zenith-Sky Mobile DOAS System and Comparisons with Satellite Observations , 2013, Sensors.

[16]  B. de Foy,et al.  Characterizing ozone production in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area: a case study using a chemical transport model , 2006 .

[17]  Ingemar Furenlid,et al.  Solar flux atlas from 296 to 1300 nm , 1985 .

[18]  Dietrich Althausen,et al.  Retrieval of Aerosol Profiles using Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) , 2003 .

[19]  Alexis Merlaud,et al.  DOAS measurements of NO 2 from an ultralight aircraft during the Earth Challenge expedition , 2012 .

[20]  N. Elsayed,et al.  Toxicity of nitrogen dioxide: an introduction. , 1994, Toxicology.

[21]  Yang Wang,et al.  Observation of tropospheric NO2 by airborne multi-axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy in the Pearl River Delta region, south China , 2014 .

[22]  Nicolas Theys,et al.  Evaluation of tropospheric SO 2 retrieved from MAX-DOAS measurements in Xianghe, China , 2014 .

[23]  John P. Burrows,et al.  Ship-based MAX-DOAS measurements of tropospheric NO2 and SO2 in the South China and Sulu Sea , 2015 .

[24]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Mobile mini-DOAS measurement of the outflow of NO 2 and HCHO from Mexico City , 2009 .

[25]  P. A. Sheppard,et al.  Atmospheric Diffusion , 1962, Nature.

[26]  Pinhua Xie,et al.  Observations of SO 2 and NO 2 by mobile DOAS in the Guangzhou eastern area during the Asian Games 2010 , 2013 .

[27]  Steffen Beirle,et al.  Estimation of NO x emissions from Delhi using Car MAX-DOAS observations and comparison with OMI satellite data , 2011 .