Pilot plant study of four new solvents for post combustion carbon dioxide capture by reactive absorption and comparison to MEA

Abstract Reducing the solvent regeneration energy is one of the main challenges in CO 2 capture from power plant flue gases. New tailored solvents are needed to achieve this goal. The present work describes tests of such new solvents in a gas-fired pilot plant which comprises the complete absorption/desorption process (column diameters 0.125 m, absorber/desorber packing height 4.2/2.52 m, flue gas flow 30–110 kg/h, CO 2 partial pressure 35–135 mbar). Four new solvents are studied and compared to MEA. Two of the new solvents SOLVENT1 (0.25 g/g N -methyldiethanolamine + 0.15 g/g N -methyl-1,3-propanediamine + 0.6 g/g H 2 O) and SOLVENT2 (0.25 g/g 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol + 0.15 g/g N -methyl-1,3-propanediamine + 0.6 g/g H 2 O) are developed in an EU project; and two other solvents SOLVENT3 and SOLVENT4 are developed by BASF. The four new solvents and MEA are studied in the same way in the pilot plant and detailed results are reported for all solvents. The measurements are carried out at constant CO 2 removal rate by an adjustment of regeneration energy in the desorber. The solvent flow rate is systematically varied. An optimal solvent flow rate leading to a minimum energy requirement is found from these studies. Direct comparisons of such results can suffer from differences in the kinetics of different solvent systems. These differences are experimentally studied by varying the flue gas flow rate at a constant ratio of solvent mass flow to flue gas mass flow and constant removal rate. Taking into account the results from these studies on kinetics allows a reasonable ranking of the solvents. The most promising of the studied solvents is SOLVENT4.

[1]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Energy performance of stripper configurations for CO2 capture by aqueous amines , 2006 .

[2]  Hans Hasse,et al.  A short-cut method for assessing absorbents for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture , 2011 .

[3]  Norbert Asprion,et al.  Nonequilibrium rate-based simulation of reactive systems : Simulation model, heat transfer, and influence of film discretization , 2006 .

[4]  Olav Bolland,et al.  Comparison of solvents for post-combustion capture of CO2 by chemical absorption , 2009 .

[5]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Effects of the Temperature Bulge in CO2 Absorption from Flue Gas by Aqueous Monoethanolamine , 2008 .

[6]  Norbert Asprion,et al.  Simulation of mass transfer in reactive absorption , 2006 .

[7]  Norbert Asprion,et al.  Selection and Pilot Plant Tests of New Absorbents for Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide Capture , 2007 .

[8]  Hallvard F. Svendsen,et al.  Comparative study of the heats of absorption of post-combustion CO2 absorbents , 2011 .

[9]  Hans Hasse,et al.  Pilot plant experimental studies of post combustion CO2 capture by reactive absorption with MEA and new solvents , 2009 .

[10]  Masaki Iijima,et al.  Development of energy saving technology for flue gas carbon dioxide recovery in power plant by chemical absorption method and steam system , 1997 .

[11]  G. Versteeg,et al.  CO2 capture from power plants. Part I: A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine , 2007 .

[12]  Hans Hasse,et al.  Pilot plant study of post-combustion carbon dioxide capture by reactive absorption: Methodology, comparison of different structured packings, and comprehensive results for monoethanolamine , 2011 .

[13]  Hans Hasse,et al.  Post combustion CO2 capture by reactive absorption: Pilot plant description and results of systematic studies with MEA , 2012 .

[14]  Jörn Rolker,et al.  Abtrennung von Kohlendioxid aus Rauchgasen mittels Absorption , 2006 .

[15]  Jacob Nygaard Knudsen,et al.  Experience with CO2 capture from coal flue gas in pilot-scale: Testing of different amine solvents , 2009 .

[16]  Achim Hoffmann,et al.  Standardization of Mass Transfer Measurements: A Basis for the Description of Absorption Processes , 2007 .

[17]  A. F. Seibert,et al.  Influence of viscosity and surface tension on the effective mass transfer area of structured packing , 2009 .

[18]  Jacob Nygaard Knudsen,et al.  Evaluation of process upgrades and novel solvents for the post combustion CO2 capture process in pilot-scale , 2011 .

[19]  Tomio Mimura,et al.  Research and development on energy saving technology for flue gas carbon dioxide recovery and steam system in power plant , 1995 .

[20]  M. Sander,et al.  The Fluor Daniel® econamine FG process: Past experience and present day focus , 1992 .