Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People

Transactive memory is the shared division of cognitive labor with respect to the encoding, storage, retrieval, and communication of information from different knowledge domains, which often develops in groups and can lead to greater efficiency and effectiveness. Although discussions of transactive memory theory suggest that components of the theory are dynamic, research tends to treat transactive memory as evolving linearly, using static measures rather than assessing development over time. In response, we offer a model emphasizing both linear and cyclical aspects of transactive memory development in work groups, and we propose that task is a major influence on developmental processes. We introduce task representation and the task-expertise-person (TEP) unit as basic constructs involved in transactive memory development, and we provide a dynamic model of how TEP units are constructed, evaluated, and utilized. Regarding observable changes over time, we propose that transactive memory systems can vary in terms of accuracy (the degree to which group members' perceptions about others' task-related expertise are accurate), sharedness (the degree to which members have a shared representation of the transactive memory system), and validation (the degree to which group members participate in the transactive memory system). Convergence is the optimal state of transactive memory systems and reflects high levels of accuracy, sharedness, and validation.

[1]  Linda Argote,et al.  Training People to Work in Groups , 2002 .

[2]  S. Parker,et al.  Production Teamworking: The Importance of Interdependence and Autonomy for Employee Strain and Satisfaction , 2000 .

[3]  T. Connolly,et al.  The reinvention of decision making. , 1993 .

[4]  A. Hollingshead.  Perceptions of Expertise and Transactive Memory in Work Relationships , 2000 .

[5]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[6]  Masanori Takezawa,et al.  Centrality in sociocognitive networks and social influence : An illustration in a group decision-making context , 1997 .

[7]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  FOSTERING INTRANET KNOWLEDGE- SHARING: AN INTEGRATION OF TRANSACTIVE MEMORY AND PUBLIC GOODS APPROACHES , 2001 .

[8]  D. Wegner,et al.  Transactive memory in close relationships. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  D. Wegner,et al.  Cognitive interdependence in close relationships , 1985 .

[10]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Analyzing knowledge requirements in team tasks , 2000 .

[11]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  Gender Stereotypes and Assumptions about Expertise in Transactive Memory , 2003 .

[12]  A P Banks,et al.  Running shared mental models as a distributed cognitive process. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[13]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Communication and Transactive Memory Systems , 2003 .

[14]  James W. Michaels,et al.  Rationale and Design for Reducing Sex Differences in Occupational and Educational Attainment by Strengthening Across-Sex Peer Influences. Report No. 196. , 1975 .

[15]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[16]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What , 1995 .

[18]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task completion. , 1996 .

[19]  D. Campbell.  Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis , 1988 .

[20]  R. Moreland,et al.  Exploring the Performance Benefits of Group Training: Transactive Memory or Improved Communication? , 2000 .

[21]  Nancy Staggers,et al.  Mental Models: Concepts for Human-Computer Interaction Research , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[22]  Diane Liang Rulke,et al.  Distribution of Knowledge, Group Network Structure, and Group Performance , 2000 .

[23]  J M Schraagen,et al.  Effects of two types of intra-team feedback on developing a shared mental model in Command & Control teams , 2000, Ergonomics.

[24]  G. Littlepage,et al.  Effects of Task Experience and Group Experience on Group Performance, Member Ability, and Recognition of Expertise , 1997 .

[25]  A. Hollingshead.  Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems , 1998 .

[26]  G Dunn,et al.  Rationale and design. PRiSM Psychosis Study I. , 1998, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.

[27]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  Mental Models of Groups as Social Systems , 1995 .

[28]  Diane Liang Rulke,et al.  Investigating the Encoding Process of Transactive Memory Development in Group Training , 2000 .

[29]  G. M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Coordination in Task-Performing Groups , 2002 .

[30]  E. Salas,et al.  Theoretical Bases for Team Self-correction: Fostering Shared Mental Models , 1997 .

[31]  T. Baguley,et al.  Long-Term Memory for Spatial and Temporal Mental Models Includes Construction Processes and Model Structure , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  Valerie L. Shalin,et al.  Cognitive task analysis , 2000 .

[33]  John M. Levine,et al.  Creating the Ideal Group: Composition Effects at Work , 2018, Understanding Group Behavior.

[34]  D. Wegner.  Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[35]  A. Koriat,et al.  Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[36]  Gabriel Mugny,et al.  The social construction of knowledge: Social marking and socio-cognitive conflict. , 1998 .

[37]  Rebecca A. Henry,et al.  Helping Groups Determine Their Most Accurate Member: The Role of Outcome Feedback1 , 1996 .

[38]  Dennis J. Devine,et al.  Teams in Organizations , 1999 .

[39]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Potential Benefits of Communication in Transactive Memory Systems , 2003 .

[40]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? , 1994 .

[41]  D. Wegner.  A Computer Network Model of Human Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[42]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Planning, Shared Mental Models, and Coordinated Performance: An Empirical Link Is Established , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[43]  Aimin Yan,et al.  The Migration of Organizational Functions to the Work Unit Level: Buffering, Spanning, and Bringing Up Boundaries , 1999 .

[44]  Linda Argote,et al.  Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. , 1996 .

[45]  P BrandonDavid,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations , 2004 .

[46]  A. Hollingshead.  Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  A. Hollingshead.  Communication, Learning, and Retrieval in Transactive Memory Systems☆☆☆ , 1998 .

[48]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[49]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[50]  Erika D Peterson,et al.  Collective Efficacy and Aspects of Shared Mental Models as Predictors of Performance Over Time in Work Groups , 2000 .

[51]  Sharon J. Derry,et al.  Individual and Distributed Cognitions in Interdisciplinary Teamwork: A Developing Case Study and Emerging Theory , 1997 .

[52]  R. Moreland,et al.  Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[53]  J. McGrath.  Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[54]  Charles E. Miller,et al.  Communication Networks in Task-Performing Groups , 2000 .

[55]  R. Moreland.  Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. , 1999 .

[56]  J. Levine,et al.  Knowledge Transmission in Work Groups: Helping Newcomers to Succeed , 1999 .

[57]  H. Kelley,et al.  Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence , 1978 .

[58]  G. M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information , 1999 .

[59]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Developmental Processes in Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[60]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  Tacit Knowledge as a Source of Competitive Advantage in the National Basketball Association , 2002 .

[61]  G. Klein,et al.  Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods , 1993 .

[62]  David N. Ford,et al.  Mental models concepts for system dynamics research , 1998 .

[63]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  An Organizational Memory Approach to Information Management , 1998 .

[64]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Groupand Individual Training , 1998 .

[65]  Raymond S. Nickerson,et al.  How We Know—and Sometimes Misjudge—What Others Know: Imputing One's Own Knowledge to Others , 1999 .

[66]  L. Thompson,et al.  Socially Shared Cognition, Affect, and Behavior: A Review and Integration , 1999, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.