Phonetic Interpretation Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI: On the factorability of phonological units in speech perception

At least in English, the perception of syllables and words can be largely predicted from the perception of smaller (e.g., segmentor phoneme-sized) symbolic units. Experiments involving the intelligibility of natural speech in noise provide one important source of evidence for the factorability of syllables into segments. Results reviewed by Allen (1994 a, b) show that the correct identification of nonsense CVC syllables in noise can be extremely well predicted from the marginal correct identification of their constituent phonemes. Simulation experiments by Nearey (in press) suggest that this result (as well as the systematic increase in the correct identification of real words over nonsense) can be achieved when stimulus patterns for syllables are simple functions of their phoneme parts. However, stimulus patterns for syllables that include idiosyncratic properties that are not predictable from segmental components apparently cannot produce such results. Several perception experiments with synthetic speech also support the factorability-of-syllables hypothesis. These experiments involve the simultaneous perception of consonants and vowels. They suggest that perception of syllabic wholes can be largely predicted from the perception of their segmental parts. Evidence supporting this hypothesis is reviewed and some remaining problems (where factorability appears to break down) are discussed. The question of whether a similar degree of factorability extends to smaller, feature-sized units and how any such elements may relate to universal distinctive features is briefly explored. Nearey On factorability... OnFactMarch2k1R1Mac.doc 5/17/0112:10 PM 2 X.

[1]  D W Massaro,et al.  Independence of lexical context and phonological information in speech perception. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Gavin Burnage Celex-a guide for users , 1990 .

[3]  P. Mermelstein,et al.  On the relationship between vowel and consonant identification when cued by the same acoustic information , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  G. A. Miller,et al.  An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .

[5]  Jont B. Allen,et al.  ASA Edition of Speech and Hearing in Communication , 1996 .

[6]  José Benkí,et al.  Evidence for phonological categories from speech perception , 1998 .

[7]  D H Whalen,et al.  Vowel and consonant judgments are not independent when cued by the same information. , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  T. M. Nearey,et al.  Speech perception as pattern recognition. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  D. Massaro,et al.  Phonological context in speech perception , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  D. Broadbent Word-frequency effect and response bias. , 1967, Psychological review.

[11]  T. M. Nearey,et al.  Context Effects in a Double-Weak Theory of Speech Perception , 1992, Language and speech.

[12]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  On the quantal nature of speech , 1972 .

[13]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[14]  R. Nosofsky Exemplar-Based Accounts of Relations Between Classification, Recognition, and Typicality , 1988 .

[15]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Duration of Syllable Nuclei in English , 1960 .

[16]  K. Stevens,et al.  Primary Features and Their Enhancement in Consonants , 1989 .

[17]  Terrance M. Nearey,et al.  The segment as a unit of speech perception , 1990 .

[18]  M. Pitt,et al.  Is Compensation for Coarticulation Mediated by the Lexicon , 1998 .

[19]  D. Massaro,et al.  Evaluation and integration of acoustic features in speech perception. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[21]  James L. McClelland Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context on perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  D. Massaro Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  A. Boothroyd,et al.  Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  H. Sussman,et al.  An investigation of locus equations as a source of relational invariance for stop place categorization , 1991 .

[25]  Harvey b. Fletcher,et al.  Speech and hearing in communication , 1953 .

[26]  Jont B. Allen,et al.  How do humans process and recognize speech? , 1993, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..