The Design of Learning Materials within Small Scale Projects: What is the Value of an Action Research Approach?

This chapter discusses the design of learning materials in the context of small scale projects within higher education. It describes the enduring appeal of instructional material and its growing use following the take up of virtual learning environments (VLEs) / learning platforms in teaching and learning. It suggests that action research approaches may be of value in the design of instructional material as they offer systematic, formative feedback at an early stage in the design process and prioritise user participation. A case study is provided of a broadly action research approach to the design of instructional material to support academic reading skills at one university. The case exemplifies the strengths of action research but also highlights the tensions and difficulties, in particular that of securing the engagement of stakeholders. The implications for further research are brought out.

[1]  William Grabe,et al.  Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice , 2008 .

[2]  Matt Lingard.  Why don’t all lecturers make use of VLEs?: what can the so-called “laggards” tell us? , 2007 .

[3]  Stephen Kemmis,et al.  The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research , 2013 .

[4]  Ed.D. Ruth Gannon Cook,et al.  Combining Quality and Expediency with Action Research in ELearning Instructional Design , 2008 .

[5]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[6]  Patricia L. Carrell,et al.  Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading , 1988 .

[7]  Jean McNiff.  Teaching as Learning: An Action Research Approach , 1993 .

[8]  Mary Thorpe.  From independent learning to collaborative learning: new communities of practice in open, distance and distributed learning , 2001 .

[9]  Gail Salaway,et al.  The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2008 , 2007 .

[10]  Mark Childs,et al.  In-World Behaviors and Learning in a Virtual World , 2014, Int. J. Virtual Pers. Learn. Environ..

[11]  Jooyong Park,et al.  Higher retention after a new take-home computerised test , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[12]  John Stephenson,et al.  Teaching & learning online : new pedagogies for new technologies , 2001 .

[13]  J. Shute,et al.  The adaptation of foreign students: Student views and institutional implications. , 1986 .

[14]  G. Kirkup,et al.  Information and communications technologies (ICT) in higher education teaching—a tale of gradualism rather than revolution , 2005 .

[15]  Stephen Waters‐Adams.  Collaboration and Action Research: a cautionary tale , 1994 .

[16]  S. Johnston.  Is action research a ‘natural’ Process for teachers? , 1994 .

[17]  B. Allegranzi,et al.  'My five moments for hand hygiene': a user-centred design approach to understand, train, monitor and report hand hygiene. , 2007, The Journal of hospital infection.

[18]  Martin Greenhow,et al.  How effective is feedback in Computer‐Aided Assessments? , 2008 .

[19]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Transcending the individual human mind—creating shared understanding through collaborative design , 2000, TCHI.

[20]  M. Rothermel,et al.  Development and Management of Virtual Schools: Issues and Trends , 2005 .

[21]  Ann Light,et al.  Designing for social justice: people, technology, learning , 2008 .

[22]  Linda Carswell.  Possible versus desirable in instructional systems: who's driving? , 1998 .

[23]  K. Lewin.  Action Research and Minority Problems , 1946 .

[24]  Cushla Kapitzke,et al.  Virtual vignettes and pedagogical potentials: Insights into a virtual schooling service , 2004 .

[25]  Judith Watson,et al.  Does regular online testing enhance student learning in the numerical sciences? Robust evidence from a large data set , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[26]  Peggy A. Ertmer.  Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? , 2005 .

[27]  Teresa Martín-Blas,et al.  The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology , 1993 .

[29]  Nick Rushby,et al.  Understanding the past - illuminating the future , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[30]  Errol Yudko,et al.  "Hits" (not "Discussion Posts") predict student success in online courses: A double cross-validation study , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Dianne Chambers,et al.  Beyond Test Accuracy: Benefits of Measuring Response Time in Computerised Testing. , 2007 .

[32]  Betty Collis,et al.  Merrill Plus: Blending corporate strategy and instructional design , 2005 .

[33]  Florence Martin,et al.  The impact of instructional elements in computer-based instruction , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[34]  Philipa Levy.  "Living" Theory: A Pedagogical Framework for Process Support in Networked Learning , 2006 .