Encouraging Greater Student Inquiry Engagement in Science Through Motivational Support by Online Scientist‐Mentors

Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) call for integrating knowledge and practice in learning experiences in K-12 science education. PlantingScience (PS), an ideal curriculum for use as an NGSS model, is a computer-mediated collaborative learning environment intertwining scientific inquiry, classroom instruction, and online mentoring from scientists. With implementation in hundreds of classrooms across the United States, science teachers have noted PS as successful in motivating their students to engage in classroom inquiry investigations. To investigate the role of the online scientist-mentors in motivating students in the PS learning environment, we used self-determination theory (SDT) to guide a multiple case study of 10 student inquiry teams engaged in PS in a rural public school in a large Southwestern U.S. state. We used online dialogues between scientist-mentors and their assigned student inquiry teams to answer research questions about the motivational support provided by scientist-mentors and the association between this support and students' engagement in scientific inquiry. Analyses revealed a general relationship between scientist-mentor motivational support and student inquiry engagement. Differences were observed in the specific ways in which scientists supported autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Student inquiry engagement corresponded to high support in relatedness, whereas correspondence with autonomy support was low.

[1]  E. Dolan,et al.  Helping students make meaning of authentic investigations: findings from a student–teacher–scientist partnership , 2012, Cultural studies of science education.

[2]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[3]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[4]  T. Reeves,et al.  The Effects of a Web-Based Learning Environment on Student Motivation in a High School Earth Science Course , 2006 .

[5]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[6]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Learning Science through Research Apprenticeships: A Critical Review of the Literature. , 2009 .

[7]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[8]  E. Deci,et al.  Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. , 2002 .

[9]  E. Deci,et al.  Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. , 1994, Journal of personality.

[10]  Michael J. Middleton,et al.  Turning the Kaleidoscope: What We See When Self-Regulated Learning is Viewed With a Qualitative Lens , 2002 .

[11]  Robert Ren,et al.  Next Generation Science Standards-2 (HB 23) , 2015 .

[12]  R. B. Johnson.  Examining the Validity Structure of Qualitative Research , 1997 .

[13]  W. L. Eikenberry.  The national association for research in science teaching , 1929 .

[14]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[15]  Terry Anderson,et al.  E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice , 2016 .

[16]  Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al.  The role of scaffolding and motivation in CSCL , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Teresa K. Debacker,et al.  Extending the Traditional Classroom Through Online Discussion: The Role of Student Motivation , 2006 .

[18]  Kuan-Chung Chen,et al.  Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Anita L. Blanchard,et al.  Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: New directions in research , 2003 .

[20]  R. Ryan,et al.  Parent Styles Associated with Children's Self-Regulation and Competence in School. , 1989 .

[21]  M. Lombard,et al.  Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability , 2002 .

[22]  J. Fleiss.  Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. , 1971 .

[23]  E. Deci,et al.  Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning , 1996 .

[24]  M. Moore.  The Theory of Transactional Distance , 2012, Handbook of Distance Education.

[25]  D. Garrison,et al.  The Development of a Community of Inquiry over Time in an Online Course: Understanding the Progression and Integration of Social, Cognitive and Teaching Presence. , 2008 .

[26]  M. Chi.  Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide , 1997 .

[27]  Alfred P. Rovai,et al.  Facilitating online discussions effectively , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[28]  K. Kurasaki,et al.  Intercoder Reliability for Validating Conclusions Drawn from Open-Ended Interview Data , 2000 .

[29]  Chun-Yen Chang,et al.  Internet‐based Science Learning: A review of journal publications , 2011 .

[30]  C. Peterson.  Mentored Engagement of Secondary Science Students, Plant Scientists, and Teachers in an Inquiry-Based Online Learning Environment , 2012 .

[31]  John L. Campbell,et al.  Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews , 2013 .

[32]  K. Krippendorff.  Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations , 2004 .

[33]  J. Reeve,et al.  Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. , 2002 .

[34]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[35]  D. Cicchetti.  Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. , 1994 .

[36]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  The Concept of Competence: A Starting Place for Understanding Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determined Extrinsic Motivation. , 2005 .

[37]  S. Glynn,et al.  Attitudinal and Motivational Constructs in Science Learning , 2013 .

[38]  R. Vallerand,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. , 2002 .

[39]  Shawn M. Glynn,et al.  Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science , 2011 .

[40]  Daniel C. Edelson.  Realising Authentic Science Learning through the Adaptation of Scientific Practice , 2015 .

[41]  Cheryl Ann Peterson,et al.  The Online Elements of Inquiry Checklist: Evaluating an Innovative Online Learning Environment Providing Opportunities for Scientific Practice and Discourse among Students, Scientists, and Teachers , 2011 .

[42]  R. Vallerand,et al.  Autonomous, Controlled, and Amotivated Types of Academic Motivation: A Person-Oriented Analysis , 2007 .

[43]  Rajiv Vaidyanathan,et al.  Dictionary of statistics and methodology : #a #nontechnical guide for the social sciences , 1994 .

[44]  Daniel C. Moos,et al.  Adventure Learning , 2011 .

[45]  E. Skinner.  What is the Need for Competence , 1995 .

[46]  Daniel J. Hruschka,et al.  Reliability in Coding Open-Ended Data: Lessons Learned from HIV Behavioral Research , 2004 .

[47]  R. Mayer.  Towards a science of motivated learning in technology-supported environments , 2011 .

[48]  E. Deci,et al.  Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective , 2008 .

[49]  A. Huberman,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook , 1994 .

[50]  C. Stuessy,et al.  Building Botanical Literacy , 2011, Science.

[51]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century , 2013 .

[52]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  l9: Self-Determination Research: Reflections and Future Directions , 2002 .

[53]  Gary W. Ritter,et al.  Next Generation Science Standards , 2013 .

[54]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Content analysis: What are they talking about? , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[55]  R. Koestner,et al.  Distinguishing three ways of being highly motivated: A closer look at introjection, identification, and intrinsic motivation. , 2002 .

[56]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Intentional Conceptual Change , 2003 .

[57]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning To Solve Problems. Technical Report No. 9. , 1987 .

[58]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[59]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review , 2006, Comput. Educ..