Impact of Presentation Format and Self-Reported Risk Aversion on Revealed Skewness Preferences

This paper reports the results of an experiment on the revealed preference for skewness in a comparison of continuous return distributions. We find that revealed preferences are highly sensitive to the way asset risks are communicated. Whereas probability density functions lead to a pronounced preference for left-skewed distributions, the opposite is true for cumulative distribution functions. Systematic misperceptions of the variance cannot explain the sensitivity of preferences to the presentation format. Part of the preference for positive skewness when risks are communicated through probability density functions is due to a systematic misestimation of the expected return. We also find that self-reported risk aversion, a measure of risk attitude commonly used in practice, is a valuable predictor of skewness preferences. Individuals that judge themselves as more risk averse show a stronger preference for right skewness.

[1]  Arjan Berkelaar,et al.  Optimal Portfolio Choice under Loss Aversion , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[2]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[3]  Todd Mitton,et al.  Equilibrium Underdiversification and the Preference for Skewness , 2004 .

[4]  Lola L. Lopes,et al.  [Advances in Experimental Social Psychology] Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Volume 20 Volume 20 || Between Hope and Fear: The Psychology of Risk , 1987 .

[5]  M. Birnbaum,et al.  Testing Descriptive Utility Theories: Violations of Stochastic Dominance and Cumulative Independence , 1998 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[7]  E. Weber,et al.  Cognition-Mediated Coevolution: Context-Dependent Evaluations and Sensitivity of Pollinators to Variability in Nectar Rewards , 2003 .

[8]  M. Granger Morgan,et al.  Graphical Communication of Uncertain Quantities to Nontechnical People , 1987 .

[9]  William Gould,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation with stata , 1999 .

[10]  K. Arrow.  Essays in the theory of risk-bearing , 1958 .

[11]  E. Weber,et al.  Perceived risk attitudes: relating risk perception to risky choice , 1997 .

[12]  William T. Shaw,et al.  The alchemy of probability distributions: beyond Gram-Charlier expansions, and a skew-kurtotic-normal distribution from a rank transmutation map , 2009, 0901.0434.

[13]  Brian H. Boyer,et al.  Expected Idiosyncratic Skewness , 2009 .

[14]  Martin Weber,et al.  Communicating Asset Risk , 2005 .

[15]  V. Agarwal,et al.  Dynamic Investment Opportunities and the Cross-Section of Hedge Fund Returns : Implications of Higher-Moment Risks for Performance , 2008 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Anomalies: Preference Reversals , 1990 .

[17]  W. Sharpe,et al.  Choosing Outcomes Versus Choosing Products: Consumer-Focused Retirement Investment Advice , 2008 .

[18]  E. Weber,et al.  Communicating Asset Risk: How Name Recognition and the Format of Historic Volatility Information Affect Risk Perception and Investment Decisions , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  Lola L. Lopes.  Risk and Distributional Inequality. , 1984 .

[20]  A. Kühberger,et al.  The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-analysis. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[21]  Thomas M. Arnold.  Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices , 2009 .

[22]  Christian Seidl,et al.  Preference Reversal , 2002 .

[23]  Nishad Kapadia.  The Next Microsoft? Skewness, Idiosyncratic Volatility, and Expected Returns , 2006 .

[24]  Fred D. Arditti.  RISK AND THE REQUIRED RETURN ON EQUITY , 1967 .

[25]  F. Black,et al.  The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  Campbell R. Harvey,et al.  Conditional Skewness in Asset Pricing Tests , 1999 .

[27]  M. Unser.  Lower partial moments as measures of perceived risk: An experimental study , 2000 .

[28]  William T. Shaw,et al.  The Alchemy of Probability Distributions : Beyond Gram-Charlier & Cornish-Fisher Expansions , and Skew-Normal or Kurtotic-Normal Distributions , 2007 .

[29]  R. Litzenberger,et al.  SKEWNESS PREFERENCE AND THE VALUATION OF RISK ASSETS , 1976 .

[30]  Stein W. Wallace,et al.  Generating Scenario Trees for Multistage Decision Problems , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[31]  A. Falk,et al.  Individual Risk Attitudes: Measurement, Determinants and Behavioral Consequences , 2009 .

[32]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[33]  Joseph H. Golec,et al.  Bettors Love Skewness, Not Risk, at the Horse Track , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[34]  Michal Kaut,et al.  A Heuristic for Moment-Matching Scenario Generation , 2003, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[35]  John C. Butler,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Assumptions of Risk-Value Models , 2005 .

[36]  G. Harrison.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Utility Functions Using Stata , 2008 .

[37]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[38]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  CLUSTER-SAMPLE METHODS IN APPLIED ECONOMETRICS: AN EXTENDED ANALYSIS , 2006 .

[39]  J. Qiu,et al.  A Note on Skewness Seeking: An Experimental Analysis , 2007 .

[40]  Stephen Diacon,et al.  Framing Effects and Risk Perception: The Effect of Prior Performance Presentation Format on Investment Fund Choice , 2007 .