Identifying Urban Road Black Spots with a Novel Method Based on the Firefly Clustering Algorithm and a Geographic Information System

With the rapid development of urban road traffic, there are a certain number of black spots in an urban road network. Therefore, it is important to create a method to effectively identify the urban road black spots in order to quickly and accurately ensure the safety of residents and maintain the sustainable development of a city. In this study, a GIS (geographic information system) and the Firefly Clustering Algorithm are combined. On the one hand, a GIS can accurately extract the distance between accident points through its spatial analysis function, overcoming the disadvantage of the accident data not usually including the specific location data. On the other hand, the Firefly Clustering Algorithm can be used to comprehensively extract the characteristics of accident points, which is particularly suitable for the identification of black spots. In order to verify the feasibility of the proposed method, this research compares the identification effect between the OD (origin–destination) cost distance calculated by GIS and the Euclidean distance. The results show that the Euclidean distance is smaller than the OD cost distance and that the accident search method based on the Euclidean distance can overestimate the number of black spots, especially for intersections. Therefore, the proposed method based on the Firefly Clustering Algorithm and GIS can not only contribute to identifying urban road black spots but also plays an auxiliary role in reducing urban road crashes and maintaining sustainable urban development.

[1]  Steven A. Freeman,et al.  Frequency analysis of hazardous material transportation incidents as a function of distance from origin to incident location , 2009 .

[2]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Firefly algorithm, stochastic test functions and design optimisation , 2010, Int. J. Bio Inspired Comput..

[3]  Jochen Köhler,et al.  Prediction of road accidents: A Bayesian hierarchical approach. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Donald C. Weber,et al.  Accident Rate Potential: An Application of Multiple Regression Analysis of a Poisson Process , 1971 .

[5]  Ajith Abraham,et al.  Traffic Accident Analysis Using Machine Learning Paradigms , 2005, Informatica.

[6]  Ivanoe De Falco,et al.  Facing classification problems with Particle Swarm Optimization , 2007, Appl. Soft Comput..

[7]  Magdalene Marinaki,et al.  A hybrid stochastic genetic–GRASP algorithm for clustering analysis , 2008, Oper. Res..

[8]  Dervis Karaboga,et al.  A novel clustering approach: Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) algorithm , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[9]  Ibrahim Yilmaz,et al.  Geographical information systems aided traffic accident analysis system case study: city of Afyonkarahisar. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Data clustering: a review , 1999, CSUR.

[11]  H. Miller Potential Contributions of Spatial Analysis to Geographic Information Systems for Transportation (GIS-T) , 2010 .

[12]  Yordphol Tanaboriboon,et al.  APPLYING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION APPROACH TO BLACK SPOT IDENTIFICATION PROCESS: – A Case Study in Thailand – , 2006 .

[13]  Sarath C. Joshua,et al.  Estimating truck accident rate and involvements using linear and poisson regression models , 1990 .

[14]  Tamitza Toroyan,et al.  Global status report on road safety , 2009, Injury Prevention.

[15]  Per Ole Wanvik,et al.  A new method for assessing the risk of accident associated with darkness. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  S. Erdogan Explorative spatial analysis of traffic accident statistics and road mortality among the provinces of Turkey. , 2009, Journal of safety research.