Ex-ante sustainability assessment of cleaner banana production systems

As one of the largest users of pesticides in the world, banana production is responsible for numerous types of pollution affecting water, soil and air and causing a variety of health issues. Agroecological innovations can help to reduce pesticide use and achieve cleaner and more sustainable banana production systems. Innovations must be well suited to the diversity of banana farms and acceptable to the stakeholders involved in production. We tested the impact of 18 agroecological innovations in Guadeloupe on the sustainability of three contrasted production systems, using the multi-criteria assessment model MASC. These innovations included different types of fallow (A), bans on pesticides (B), conditional applications of pesticides (C), intercropping (D), resistant cultivars (E), and integrated systems (F). In the assessment, we introduced the views of 29 stakeholders involved in sustainability issues relative to banana grouped through three sets of weightings, obtained by direct weighting of the indicators used in a multi-criteria assessment tool. We analysed the effects of each set of weightings on the sustainability level for these different banana production systems. Our results showed that the adoption of innovations can have negative, positive or no effects on the overall sustainability of banana production systems. Although none of the innovations had a positive effect on all cropping systems, some innovations were relevant to several farm types. However, this depended on the sets of weightings considered, because we found several types of stakeholder with opposing views on the importance of sustainability components. Integrated and organic systems produced the best results in terms of increasing sustainability and were relevant to current farming systems. However, in order to obtain cleaner banana production at the landscape scale, a combination of these innovations, tailored to the diversity of farmers' situations and stakeholder preferences, still needs to be proposed.

[1]  Luís Miguel Nunes,et al.  Selection of sustainability indicators for planning: combining stakeholders' participation and data reduction techniques , 2015 .

[2]  Walter A.H. Rossing,et al.  Leverages for on-farm innovation from farm typologies? An illustration for family-based dairy farms in north-west Michoacán, Mexico , 2015 .

[3]  J. Ikerd The need for a system approach to sustainable agriculture , 1993 .

[4]  É. Malézieux,et al.  Pesticide residues in heterogeneous plant populations, a model-based approach applied to nematicides in banana (Musa spp.). , 2007, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[5]  Jacques Wery,et al.  SIMBA, a model for designing sustainable banana-based cropping systems , 2008 .

[6]  K. Jansen,et al.  Pesticide use in banana and plantain production and risk perception among local actors in Talamanca, Costa Rica. , 2011, Environmental research.

[7]  Anil Graves,et al.  Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  J. Aubertot,et al.  Analyzing the impact of the farming context and environmental factors on cropping systems: A regional case study in Burgundy , 2015 .

[9]  S. Recous,et al.  Soil turnover of crop residues from the banana (Musa AAA cv. Petite-Naine) mother plant and simultaneous uptake by the daughter plant of released nitrogen , 2012 .

[10]  Jacques Wery,et al.  BANAD: A farm model for ex ante assessment of agro-ecological innovations and its application to banana farms in Guadeloupe , 2010 .

[11]  B Bonicelli,et al.  Pesticides applications assessment in banana crop conditions: a methodological approach , 2015, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[12]  M. Pahlow,et al.  Water footprint assessment of citrus production in South Africa: A case study of the Lower Sundays River Valley , 2016 .

[13]  Pierre Chopin,et al.  Assessment of regional variability in crop yields with spatial autocorrelation: Banana farms and policy implications in Martinique , 2013 .

[14]  P. Quénéhervé,et al.  Control of the burrowing nematode (Radopholus similis Cobb) on banana: impact of the banana field destruction method on the efficiency of the following fallow , 2003 .

[15]  Almudena Hospido,et al.  Carbon footprint along the Ecuadorian banana supply chain: methodological improvements and calculation tool. , 2016 .

[16]  Antoine Messéan,et al.  MASC, a qualitative multi-attribute decision model for ex ante assessment of the sustainability of cropping systems , 2009, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[17]  Raymond Reau,et al.  Assessing innovative cropping systems with DEXiPM, a qualitative multi-criteria assessment tool derived from DEXi , 2012 .

[18]  C. Ruepert,et al.  Effect of pesticides used in banana and pineapple plantations on aquatic ecosystems in Costa Rica. , 2014, Journal of environmental biology.

[19]  Laurence Guichard,et al.  Ex ante assessment of the sustainability of alternative cropping systems: implications for using multi-criteria decision-aid methods. A review , 2011, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[20]  B. English Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability , 1991 .

[21]  S. Bauer,et al.  Novel participatory indicators of sustainability reveal weaknesses of maize cropping in Benin , 2014, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[22]  D. Belpomme,et al.  Why pesticides could be a common cause of prostate and breast cancers in the French Caribbean Island, Martinique. An overview on key mechanisms of pesticide-induced cancer. , 2009, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[23]  P. Ross,et al.  Pesticides in blood from spectacled caiman (Caiman crocodilus) downstream of banana plantations in Costa Rica , 2013, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[24]  Thierry Doré,et al.  Using a multicriteria assessment model to evaluate the sustainability of conservation agriculture at the cropping system level in France , 2016 .

[25]  Jun Ye Some weighted aggregation operators of trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers and their multiple attribute decision making method , 2017 .

[26]  Hayo M.G. van der Werf,et al.  Exploring sustainable farming scenarios at a regional scale: an application to dairy farms in Brittany , 2012 .

[27]  Claudia R. Binder,et al.  Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture , 2010 .

[28]  Sev V. Nagalingam,et al.  CIM Justification and Optimisation , 1999 .

[29]  Marko Bohanec,et al.  Guidelines to design models assessing agricultural sustainability, based upon feedbacks from the DEXi decision support system , 2015, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[30]  Jacques Wery,et al.  Model-based assessment of technological innovation in banana cropping systems contextualized by farm types in Guadeloupe , 2009 .

[31]  Wesley W. Ingwersen,et al.  Life cycle assessment of fresh pineapple from Costa Rica , 2012 .

[32]  G. Edwards‐Jones,et al.  Modelling farmer decision-making: concepts, progress and challenges , 2006 .

[33]  Ben Brisbois Bananas, pesticides and health in southwestern Ecuador: A scalar narrative approach to targeting public health responses. , 2016, Social science & medicine.

[34]  P. Cattan,et al.  Long-term pollution by chlordecone of tropical volcanic soils in the French West Indies: a simple leaching model accounts for current residue. , 2009, Environmental pollution.

[35]  Thierry Doré,et al.  A methodological framework that accounts for farm diversity in the prototyping of crop management systems. Application to banana-based systems in Guadeloupe , 2009 .

[36]  Christopher Sutter,et al.  Sustainability check up for CDM projects , 2003 .

[37]  F. Graef,et al.  Methods to assess farming sustainability in developing countries. A review , 2015, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[38]  Guillaume Martin,et al.  Farming system design to feed the changing world. A review , 2011, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[39]  Frédérick Garcia,et al.  Models to support cropping plan and crop rotation decisions. A review , 2011, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[40]  Bruno Colomb,et al.  A guide for choosing the most appropriate method for multi-criteria assessment of agricultural systems according to decision-makers’ expectations , 2013 .

[41]  M. Ittersum,et al.  Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: A review of bio-economic farm models , 2007 .

[42]  Gonzalo Gamboa,et al.  Weighting social preferences in participatory multi-criteria evaluations: a case study on sustainable natural resource management , 2012 .

[43]  Hanne Østergård,et al.  Environmental sustainability assessment of fruit cultivation and processing using fruit and cocoa residues for bioenergy and compost. Case study from Ghana , 2016 .

[44]  Hugh Wilkins,et al.  The need for subjectivity in EIA: discourse as a tool for sustainable development , 2003 .