What Makes People Respond to “Did You Feel It?”?

The data compilation of “Did You Feel It?” (DYFI) and other similar Internet‐based macroseismic intensity databases relies on the voluntary responses from Internet users. A region of no responses could mean no perceivable ground shakings or no volunteers submitting responses. We examined the earthquake and socioeconomic conditions that affected the number of DYFI responses received for a region. A resulting statistical model described the expected number of DYFI responses received for an earthquake. We also showed that residents in California and the central and eastern United States followed similar behavior in responding to DYFI, despite the vast difference in seismicity for the two regions. This study allows for a quantitative definition of completeness for DYFI data. The presented modeling technique is applicable to other Internet‐based macroseismic intensity databases.

[1]  David A. Rhoades,et al.  Probabilistic Relationships between Ground‐Motion Parameters and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California , 2012 .

[2]  D. Albarello,et al.  The Attenuation of Seismic Intensity in Italy, Part I: Theoretical and Empirical Backgrounds , 2008 .

[3]  C. Gómez,et al.  SEISMIC HAZARD MAP FOR THE ITALIAN TERRITORY USING MACROSEISMIC DATA , 2006 .

[4]  I. Jolliffe,et al.  Forecast verification : a practitioner's guide in atmospheric science , 2011 .

[5]  John Boatwright,et al.  Exploiting the Demographics of “Did You Feel It?” Responses to Estimate the Felt Area of Moderate Earthquakes in California , 2017 .

[6]  D. Wald,et al.  Intensity distribution and isoseismal maps for the Nisqually, Washington, earthquake of 28 February 2001 , 2002 .

[7]  D. Wald,et al.  Utilization of the Internet for rapid community intensity maps , 1999 .

[8]  Paolo Gasperini,et al.  The Attenuation of Seismic Intensity in Italy: A Bilinear Shape Indicates the Dominance of Deep Phases at Epicentral Distances Longer than 45 km , 2001 .

[9]  Carlo Meletti,et al.  Seismic Hazard Assessment in Terms of Macroseismic Intensity in Italy: A Critical Analysis from the Comparison of Different Computational Procedures , 2010 .

[10]  Remko Scharroo,et al.  Generic Mapping Tools: Improved Version Released , 2013 .

[11]  D. Albarello,et al.  Attenuation relationship of macroseismic intensity in Italy for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment , 2004 .

[12]  M. Degroot,et al.  Probability and Statistics , 2021, Examining an Operational Approach to Teaching Probability.

[13]  David J. Wald,et al.  USGS "Did You Feel It?" internet-based macroseismic intensity maps , 2012 .

[14]  P. Sbarra,et al.  Web-based macroseismic survey in Italy: method validation and results , 2010 .

[15]  S. Hough.  Spatial Variability of “Did You Feel It?” Intensity Data: Insights into Sampling Biases in Historical Earthquake Intensity Distributions , 2013 .

[16]  Andrew Boyd,et al.  Broadcast Journalism: Techniques of Radio and Television News , 2008 .

[17]  R. Mcguire.  Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis , 2004 .