Evaluation of sealing ability of Biodentine™ and mineral trioxide aggregate in primary molars using scanning electron microscope: A randomized controlled in vitro trial

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and Biodentine™ when used to repair the furcal perforations in primary molars using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Study Design: The study sample comprised forty recently extracted primary molars. These teeth were placed in a 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution for 24 h and washed with tap water. Access cavities were made using a round bur in high-speed handpiece. Perforations were made in the center of the floor of the pulpal chamber using a 0.5 mm round bur. The teeth were randomly assigned into two experimental groups based on the material used to seal the perforation: Group A - MTA and Group B - Biodentine™. The packed materials were allowed to set for 24 h. The samples were sectioned longitudinally and the extent of marginal adaptation was measured by SEM. Wilcoxon-signed rank test was used for statistical analysis using SPSS software. Results: All teeth exhibited microleakage, but Biodentine™ showed significantly less leakage (0.149) compared to MTA (0.583). Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, Biodentine™ showed lesser microleakage compared to MTA and thus may be a good alternative to MTA.

[1]  M. Kaup,et al.  An in vitro study of different material properties of Biodentine compared to ProRoot MTA , 2015, Head & Face Medicine.

[2]  E. Kazazoğlu,et al.  A Review on Biodentine, a Contemporary Dentine Replacement and Repair Material , 2014, BioMed research international.

[3]  Saravanapriyan Soundappan,et al.  Biodentine versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate versus Intermediate Restorative Material for Retrograde Root End Filling: An Invitro Study , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  R. Haghgoo,et al.  Microleakage of CEM Cement and ProRoot MTA as Furcal Perforation Repair Materials in Primary Teeth , 2013, Iranian endodontic journal.

[5]  S. Sahebi,et al.  Comparison of MTA and CEM Cement Microleakage in Repairing Furcal Perforation, an In Vitro Study , 2013, Journal of dentistry.

[6]  Ajinkya M. Pawar,et al.  An in vitro comparative stereomicroscopic evaluation of marginal seal between MTA, glass inomer cement & biodentine as root end filling materials using 1% methylene blue as tracer , 2012, Endodontology.

[7]  I. G. de Moraes,et al.  Sealing ability, marginal adaptation and their correlation using three root-end filling materials as apical plugs , 2010, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[8]  T. Oliveira,et al.  Repair of furcal perforation treated with mineral trioxide aggregate in a primary molar tooth: 20-month follow-up. , 2008, Journal of dentistry for children.

[9]  M. Torabinejad,et al.  Repair of furcal perforations with mineral trioxide aggregate: two case reports. , 1996, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[10]  M. Torabinejad,et al.  Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of lateral root perforations. , 1993, Journal of endodontics.