A Self‐Organizing Model for Task Allocation via Frequent Task Quitting and Random Walks in the Honeybee

Social insect colonies are able to quickly redistribute their thousands of workers between tasks that vary strongly in space and time. How individuals collectively track spatial variability is particularly puzzling because bees have access only to local information. This work presents and tests a model showing how honeybees solve their fundamental within‐nest spatial task‐allocation problem. The algorithm, which is self‐organizing and derived from empirical studies, couples two processes with opposing effects. Frequent task quitting, followed by patrols, during which bees are insensitive to task stimuli, serves to randomize individual location throughout the nest without reference to variation in task demand, while a foraging‐for‐work‐like mechanism provides the opposing force of localizing individuals to areas of high task demand. This simple model is shown to generate sophisticated patterns of task allocation. It allocates bees to tasks in proportion to their demand, independent of their spatial distribution in the nest, and also reallocates labor in response to temporal changes in task demand. Finally, the model shows that task‐allocation patterns at the colony level do not reflect colonies allocating particular individuals to tasks. In contrast, they reflect a dynamic equilibrium of workers switching between tasks and locations in the nest.

[1]  A. Houtsmuller,et al.  Rapid switching of TFIIH between RNA polymerase I and II transcription and DNA repair in vivo. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[2]  J. Fewell.  Social Insect Networks , 2003, Science.

[3]  R. Morse.  The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees , 1994 .

[4]  Benjamin P. Oldroyd,et al.  Genetic variance in honey bees for preferred foraging distance , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  S. Graham,et al.  Honey Bee Nest Thermoregulation: Diversity Promotes Stability , 2004, Science.

[6]  NIGEL R FRANKS,et al.  Self-organizing nest construction in ants: individual worker behaviour and the nest's dynamics , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organized structures in a superorganism: do ants "behave" like molecules? , 2006 .

[8]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  Modelling collective foraging by means of individual behaviour rules in honey-bees , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  Robert L Jeanne,et al.  Scaling in Nests of a Social Wasp: A Property of the Social Group , 2002, The Biological Bulletin.

[10]  Thomas D. Seeley,et al.  Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  J. Biesmeijer.  The occurrence and context of tremble dancing in free-foraging honey bees (Apis mellifera) , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Collective patterns and decision-making , 1989 .

[13]  S. Pratt,et al.  A tunable algorithm for collective decision-making , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Scott Camazine,et al.  Self-organizing pattern formation on the combs of honey bee colonies , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  Robert E. Page,et al.  Genotypic variability in age polyethism and task specialization in the honey bee, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  Anja Weidenmüller,et al.  The control of nest climate in bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) colonies: interindividual variability and self reinforcement in fanning response , 2004 .

[17]  Wolfgang H. Kirchner,et al.  The causes of the tremble dance of the honeybee, Apis mellifera , 1994, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[18]  T. Seeley,et al.  Collective decision-making in honey bees: how colonies choose among nectar sources , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Information flow, opinion polling and collective intelligence in house-hunting social insects. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  T. Seeley,et al.  The honey bee’s tremble dance stimulates additional bees to function as nectar receivers , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  D. Sumpter.  The principles of collective animal behaviour , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  D. Gordon,et al.  Social insects: Cuticular hydrocarbons inform task decisions , 2003, Nature.

[23]  C. Brooke Worth,et al.  The Insect Societies , 1973 .

[24]  T. Seeley,et al.  The nest of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) , 1976, Insectes Sociaux.

[25]  M. Lindauer.  Communication Among Social Bees , 1961 .

[26]  Tanya Pankiw,et al.  The communal crop: modulation of sucrose response thresholds of pre-foraging honey bees with incoming nectar quality , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[27]  M. Myerscough,et al.  A flexible model of foraging by a honey bee colony: the effects of individual behaviour on foraging success. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  G. Robinson,et al.  Temporal polyethism in social insects is a developmental process , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  Brian R Johnson.  Pattern formation on the combs of honeybees: increasing fitness by coupling self-organization with templates , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Z. Huang,et al.  The Vibration Signal and Juvenile Hormone Titers in Worker Honeybees, Apis mellifera , 2004 .

[31]  R. Jeanne,et al.  The organization of work in Polybia occidentalis: costs and benefits of specialization in a social wasp , 1986, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[32]  S. O’Donnell,et al.  Worker connectivity: a review of the design of worker communication systems and their effects on task performance in insect societies , 2007, Insectes Sociaux.

[33]  Alexei Kurakin,et al.  Self-organization versus watchmaker: molecular motors and protein translocation. , 2006, Bio Systems.

[34]  A. Houtsmuller,et al.  Action of DNA repair endonuclease ERCC1/XPF in living cells. , 1999, Science.

[35]  T. Seeley,et al.  Dancing bees tune both duration and rate of waggle-run production in relation to nectar-source profitability , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[36]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  Self-assembly, self-organization and division of labour , 1999 .

[37]  Brian R. Johnson.  Reallocation of labor in honeybee colonies during heat stress: the relative roles of task switching and the activation of reserve labor , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[38]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Benefits of recruitment in honey bees: effects of ecology and colony size in an individual-based model , 2006 .

[39]  Worker piping in honey bees (Apis mellifera): the behavior of piping nectar foragers , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[40]  J. Nieh.  The stop signal of honey bees: reconsidering its message , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[41]  J. Fewell,et al.  Models of division of labor in social insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[42]  Chris Tofts,et al.  Foraging for work: how tasks allocate workers , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  D. Gordon.  The organization of work in social insect colonies , 1996, Nature.

[44]  T. Pankiw,et al.  Response thresholds to sucrose predict foraging division of labor in honeybees , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[45]  N. Calderone,et al.  Effects of interactions among genotypically diverse nestmates on task specialization by foraging honey bees (Apis mellifera) , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[46]  T. Misteli.  The concept of self-organization in cellular architecture , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[47]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Fixed response thresholds and the regulation of division of labor in insect societies , 1998 .

[48]  I D Couzin,et al.  Self-organized lane formation and optimized traffic flow in army ants , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  John B Rundle,et al.  Self-organized complexity in the physical, biological, and social sciences , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  Walter R. Tschinkel,et al.  The nest architecture of the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius , 2004, Journal of insect science.

[51]  Chris Tofts,et al.  Doing the right thing: Ants, honeybees and naked mole-rats. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[52]  Thomas D Seeley,et al.  Genetic diversity within honeybee colonies increases signal production by waggle-dancing foragers , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[53]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Spatial patterns in ant colonies , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.