Learned mastery in the rat.

Abstract In a series of five experiments, we investigated the bidirectional effects of prior experience with both control or lack of control over shock on subsequent shock-motivated activity and escape learning. Rats were tested with inescapable shock rather than escapable shock as is used in typical helplessness experiments. Naive rats initially shuttled frequently during shock but decreased activity as testing continued. Pretraining with inescapable shock reduced shuttle responding throughout testing. Unexpectedly, rats which first learned to lever press to escape shock continued unabated shuttling through 200 trials of 10-sec duration inescapable shocks (Experiment 1). These bidirectional effects were replicated using a shuttle escape response for pretreatment and lever pressing as the test response. During two uninterrupted 1000-sec duration inescapable shocks (Experiment 2), escape rats continued to lever press through the 2000-sec of shock. In the third experiment, escapable shock facilitated and inescapable shock hindered later learning when the escape contingency was degraded by a 3-sec delay of shock termination. The fourth and fifth experiments demonstrated that (1) this associative facilitation effect is not simply due to an increase in active responding by escape animals (Experiment 4), and (2) no associative facilitation is observed if the contingency is not initially degraded by a 3-sec delay (Experiment 5). Taken together, these results are the first demonstration of bidirectional effects of control on aversively motivated behavior in animals. In addition to typical helplessness effects, a “mastery” phenomenon is observed. This mastery induced by experience with escape learning is characterized by (1) a motivational effect: persistent general active behavior in the face of inescapable shock, and (2) an associative effect: facilitation in learning degraded response-shock contingencies. These are the opposite of helplessness effects, operationally and descriptively, and may be opposite in process as well.

[1]  H. Anisman.  Time-dependent variations in aversively motivated behaviors: nonassociative effects of cholinergic and catecholaminergic activity. , 1975, Psychological review.

[2]  R. Ehrman,et al.  Instrumental to Pavlovian transfer: Learning about response-reinforcer contingencies affects subsequent learning about stimulus-reinforcer contingencies , 1981 .

[3]  W. Pavlik,et al.  Electroconvulsive shock and learned helplessness in rats , 1981 .

[4]  J. Weiss.  Effects of coping behavior with and without a feedback signal on stress pathology in rats. , 1971, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[5]  A. Black,et al.  The effects of restraint and noncontingent preshock on subsequent escape learning in the rat , 1974 .

[6]  J. Overmier,et al.  Effects of inescapable shock upon subsequent escape and avoidance responding. , 1967, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[7]  F. Goodkin.  Rats learn the relationship between responding and environmental events: An expansion of the learned helplessness hypothesis , 1976 .

[8]  M. Seligman,et al.  Learned helplessness in the rat. , 1975, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[9]  S. Maier,et al.  Prior exposure to inescapable electric shock in rats affects extinction behavior after the successful acquisition of an escape response , 1974 .

[10]  S. Maier,et al.  Transituational Immunization and Therapy of Learned Helplessness in the Rat. , 1977 .

[11]  M. Seligman,et al.  Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence. , 1976 .

[12]  J. Weiss,et al.  Effects of coping behavior in different warning signal conditions on stress pathology in rats. , 1971, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[13]  N. J. Mackintosh,et al.  Stimulus selection: Learning to ignore stimuli that predict no change in reinforcement. , 1973 .

[14]  L. Pohorecky,et al.  Coping Behavior and Neurochemical Changes An Alternative Explanation for the Original "Learned Helplessness" Experiments , 1976 .

[15]  J. Weiss,et al.  Coping behavior and brain norepinephrine level in rats. , 1970, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[16]  A. G. Baker.  Learned Irrelevance and Learned Helplessness: Rats Learn that Stimuli, Reinforcers, and Responses are Uncorrelated. , 1976 .

[17]  S. Maier,et al.  Learned helplessness, inactivity, and associative deficits: effects of inescapable shock on response choice escape learning. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[18]  D. Levis.  Learned helplessness: A reply and an alternative S-R interpretation. , 1976 .

[19]  M. Seligman,et al.  Learned helplessness in the rat: time course, immunization, and reversibility. , 1975, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[20]  S. Maier,et al.  Learned Helplessness: All of us were Right (And Wrong): Inescapable Shock has Multiple Effects , 1979 .

[21]  Steven F. Maier,et al.  Exposure to inescapable shock produces both activity and associative deficits in the rat , 1978 .

[22]  S. Maier,et al.  The nature of the initial coping response and the learned helplessness effect , 1977 .

[23]  S. Maier,et al.  Failure to learn to escape by rats previously exposed to inescapable shock is partly produced by associative interference. , 1975 .

[24]  M. Seligman,et al.  Failure to escape traumatic shock. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  S. Maier,et al.  Failure to learn to escape in rats previously exposed to inescapable shock depends on nature of escape response. , 1973 .

[26]  H S HOFFMAN,et al.  A relay sequencing device for scrambling grid shock. , 1962, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[27]  Martin E. P. Seligman,et al.  Learned Helplessness in the Rat: Retention and Immunization. , 1976 .