Distance Estimation in a Dynamic Simulated Environment: A Visual Field Dependence Problem?

Egocentric distance estimation implies that the subject perceives his own location in the environment. In a simulated environment, subjects have to transpose perceptively their own observation point in order to assume their virtual body position. As only visual information specifies this position, their ability to perceive the camera viewpoint should be linked to the field dependence – independence factor (FDI). Field-independent subjects underestimated the mid-distance between their own virtual body position and a far-located target; their bisection was located between the projective (2-D) and the simulated (3-D) mid-distance which indicates their difficulty in considering the in-depth simulated spatial references. High correlations between the vertical estimation in the rod-and-frame test and the egocentric-distance-estimation task (with shifted camera) suggest a similar perceptive process in both tasks. This result is confirmed by the better performances of the field-dependent subjects in this condition. In conclusion, we discuss the relationship between FDI and the sense of presence in virtual environments.

[1]  O. W. Smith,et al.  Judgments of size and distance in photographs. , 1958, The American journal of psychology.

[2]  C. L. Thornton,et al.  Relationship between perceptual style and simulator sickness. , 1968, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  D R Goodenough,et al.  Cognitive styles: essence and origins. Field dependence and field independence. , 1981, Psychological issues.

[4]  J J Koenderink,et al.  On So-Called Paradoxical Monocular Stereoscopy , 1994, Perception.

[5]  M. Flückiger,et al.  The Perception of an Optical Flow Projected on the Ground Surface , 1988, Perception.

[6]  Brice Isableu,et al.  How dynamic visual field dependence-independence interacts with the visual contribution to postural control , 1998 .

[7]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[8]  Mel Slater,et al.  The Virtual Treadmill: A Naturalistic Metaphor for Navigation in Immersive Virtual Environments , 1995, Virtual Environments.

[9]  Eugenia M. Kolasinski,et al.  Prediction of simulator sickness in a virtual environment , 1996 .

[10]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  The perception of the upright. , 1959, Scientific American.

[11]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[12]  François Jouen,et al.  The Effect of Linear Vection on Manual Aiming at Memorized Directions of Stationary Targets , 1993, Perception.

[13]  R. Kraft,et al.  Distance Perception in Photographic Displays of Natural Settings , 1986, Perceptual and motor skills.

[14]  P K Oltman,et al.  A Portable Rod-and-Frame Apparatus , 1968, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  Bernard Baumberger,et al.  Walking in an environment of moving ground texture , 2000 .

[16]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Presence and distal attribution: phenomenology, determinants, and assessment , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[17]  J. Gibson,et al.  The visual perception of surface texture in photographs , 1987, Psychological research.