An ecological approach to embodiment and cognition

The purpose of this article is to explore the relation between embodiment and cognition from an ecological point of view, which has been given little attention in current studies on embodiment. To begin with, two basic meanings of embodiment are distinguished: the state of being embodied and the act of embodying. This article gives more attention to embodying than to being embodied. Next, the ecological framework to investigate embodiment are presented, with focusing on affordances, tool use, and the body. On this view, it is argued that tools extend action and perception capabilities, which implies that the boundary of the body can be extended beyond the surface of the skin. Then, the empirical studies on perception of affordances, on limb proprioception, and on tool use are outlined. These studies support the idea that the boundary of the body can shift. Finally, the boundary of the body is discussed in reference to perception-action systems, suggesting that research on embodiment should pay more attention to the dynamic nature of the body.

[1]  L S Mark,et al.  The effect of gap depth on the perception of whether a gap is crossable , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  J. Lockman.  A perception--action perspective on tool use development. , 2000, Child development.

[3]  A. Clark.  An embodied cognitive science? , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  A Farnè,et al.  Dynamic size‐change of hand peripersonal space following tool use , 2000, Neuroreport.

[5]  James A. Balliett,et al.  What an actor must do in order to perceive the affordance for sitting. , 1990 .

[6]  W H Warren,et al.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Gregory Burton,et al.  Non-Neural Extensions of haptic Sensitivity , 1993 .

[8]  M T Turvey,et al.  Eigenvectors of the inertia tensor and perceiving the orientation of a hand-held object by dynamic touch , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Richard G. Carson,et al.  Spoon handling in two- to four year old children , 1997 .

[10]  A. Smitsman,et al.  The development of tool use: Changing boundaries between organism and environment. , 1997 .

[11]  Naoya Hirose,et al.  The Process of Adaptation to Perceiving New Action Capabilities , 2001 .

[12]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[13]  Christopher C. Pagano,et al.  Is Limb Proprioception a Function of the Limbs' Intertial Eigenvectors? , 1996 .

[14]  W. Warren,et al.  Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  The brain has a body: adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  T. Gelder,et al.  Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition , 1995 .

[17]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind , 1992 .

[18]  M. Matarić.  Behavior-based robotics as a tool for synthesis of artificial behavior and analysis of natural behavior , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visually perceiving what is reachable. , 1989 .

[20]  M. Turvey.  Dynamic touch. , 1996, The American psychologist.

[21]  Patricia Zukow-Goldring,et al.  Evolving explanations of development: Ecological approaches to organism–environment systems. , 1997 .

[22]  G. Burton,et al.  Nonvisual judgment of the crossability of path gaps. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[24]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: a study of sitting and stair climbing. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Claudia Carello,et al.  Haptic and Visual Perception of an Affordance for Upright Posture , 1994 .

[26]  M T Turvey,et al.  Spatial and physical frames of reference in positioning a limb , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Haptically Perceiving the Length of One Rod by Means of Another , 1996 .

[28]  E. Rosch,et al.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 1993 .

[29]  A. Clark.  Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again , 1996 .

[30]  Jon Driver,et al.  Reaching with a tool extends visual–tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  E. Reed.  Encountering the world: Toward an ecological psychology. , 1997 .

[32]  Maurice Merleau-Ponty.  Phenomenology of Perception , 1964 .

[33]  J. Konczak,et al.  Changing affordances in stair climbing: the perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  J. Gibson.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[35]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Embodiment is the foundation, not a level , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[36]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  The challenge of Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of embodiment for cognitive science , 1999 .

[37]  J. Sanders.  An Ontology of Affordances , 1997 .

[38]  P. B. Pufall,et al.  Perceiving Whether or Not the World Affords Stepping Onto and Over: A Developmental Study , 1992 .

[39]  M T Turvey,et al.  Haptic probing: Perceiving the length of a probe and the distance of a surface probed , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Chapter 11 – Dynamic Touch , 1995 .

[41]  Christopher C. Pagano,et al.  Eigenvectors of the Inertia Tensor and Perceiving the Orientations of Limbs and Objects , 1998 .

[42]  G. Weiss,et al.  Perspectives on Embodiment: The Intersections of Nature and Culture , 1999 .

[43]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Building brains for bodies , 1995, Auton. Robots.

[44]  Thomas A. Stoffregen,et al.  Affordances and Events , 2000 .

[45]  F. Adams,et al.  The bounds of cognition , 2001 .

[46]  Mark L. Johnson.  The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning , 1987 .

[47]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[48]  L S Mark,et al.  A biodynamic basis for perceived categories of action: a study of sitting and stair climbing. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[49]  Anthony M. Avolio,et al.  Walking infants adapt locomotion to changing body dimensions. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  Christopher C. Pagano,et al.  THE INERTIA TENSOR AS A BASIS FOR THE PERCEPTION OF LIMB ORIENTATION , 1995 .

[51]  A. Berti,et al.  When Far Becomes Near: Remapping of Space by Tool Use , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  M T Turvey,et al.  Perceiving the vertical distances of surfaces by means of a hand-held probe. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  M T Turvey,et al.  Role of the inertia tensor in perceiving object orientation by dynamic touch. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  E. Thelen.  Time-scale dynamics and the development of an embodied cognition , 1996 .

[55]  L. Nilsson.  Perspectives on memory research , 1979 .

[56]  Jeffrey B. Wagman,et al.  Affordances and Inertial Constraints on Tool Use , 2001 .

[57]  A. Clark,et al.  The Extended Mind , 1998, Analysis.

[58]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[59]  E. Reed.  An outline of a theory of action systems. , 1982, Journal of motor behavior.

[60]  Robert E. Shaw,et al.  Dimensionless invariants for intentional systems: Measuring the fit of vehicular activities to environmental layout. , 1995 .